TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

InfluxDB 3 Open Source Now in Public Alpha Under MIT/Apache 2 License

31 点作者 otoolep4 个月前

1 comment

pauldix4 个月前
Post author, cofounder and creator of InfluxDB here. Happy to answer questions in this thread.<p>I&#x27;m guessing there will be questions about the 72 hour limit. There are two things we&#x27;re looking at:<p>First, we&#x27;re considering giving a free tier for at home and hobbyist usage of Enterprise, which doesn&#x27;t have this limitation. So this would be kind of like what Tailscale does giving a free usage plan for their commercial software.<p>Second, for Core, the open source build, we&#x27;re working on an update that will let it query any 72 hour window of historical data. Right now it doesn&#x27;t evict data, it all still exists on disk or object storage as Parquet files, but we remove the metadata information from RAM to keep things optimized for the most recent 72 hours.<p>When the update is done, you&#x27;ll be able to write and query for any period of time. But an individual query will be limited to a 72 hour time range. This is a service protection mechanism because of how the data is organized.<p>A file gets created for every 10 minute block of time for each table. So 72 hours is 432 files, which is a lot of GET requests to S3 for a single query. We don&#x27;t want to increase the range because of that. Multiple queries combining a longer range, or accessing the data from third-party clients is all still possible.<p>In Enterprise, our commercial product, we have a compactor that collapses these files into larger time blocks that also creates an index that the query engine can use.<p>Doing it this way was a deliberate choice so that we could have a permissively license open source project separate from the commercial product. If we put the compactor into the open, we&#x27;d have to put it under a source available license to limit usage so that we can still sell the database.<p>Our hope is that there&#x27;s still an audience of users that will find Core useful on its own, even without any commercial relationship with us. It&#x27;s not a full historical TSDB, but it&#x27;s not intended to be. It&#x27;s meant to be a recent data engine that can collect, process, monitor, ship, and store data paired with a fast analytical query engine against the recent buffer (or recently persisted buffer).<p>Happy to answer any followup questions about this or the release generally.
评论 #42704733 未加载
评论 #42706057 未加载
评论 #42708425 未加载
评论 #42704962 未加载