I'll repeat here a question I put in another HN thread. It's a question implicit in a statement. Am I right?<p>I think it is very likely he has no intent to sell. He doesn't need $16b he needs a lower figure, and he will secure that simply by the existence of the $16b, in some manner I dont entirely understand, and then its value is unrelated to the coin, and stands. He'll acquire real goods and property or rights over them, collateralise on that, and the secure an increase in value on them. The coin will only be guarantor over the life of some financial transaction.<p>If his $16b can secure $10b of external worth, which in turn increases to $11b, he winds up with $1b of untainted worth, independently of the $16b, he can be free of the $10b, keep the $1b and he's done. He won. "I didn't sell" can be true.