TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Facebook Advertising Efforts Face a Day of Judgment

32 点作者 mjfern将近 13 年前

10 条评论

tokenadult将近 13 年前
From the submitted article: "Indeed, Facebook hit a legal roadblock in May, when it reached a tentative settlement in a class-action lawsuit over the use of sponsored stories, one of its most effective advertising tools. In the would-be settlement, the company promised to inform users explicitly that their 'likes' could be used as endorsements for a brand or page, and that they could opt out. By one estimate, it could cost Facebook $103 million in revenue." Yeah, that's the problem Facebook has, that many approaches to leveraging user data to maximize advertising impact may be illegal, off-putting to Facebook users, or both.<p>I have been running AdBlock for a long time on Chrome, and either F. B. Purity or Social Fixer on top of Facebook, and I notice that just since about the time of the Facebook IPO that Facebook advertisements are again showing up as I view my own profile on Facebook. Most but not all of these show up as "sponsored stories." I never like any of the ads. I don't like the "social" ads that mention my friends by name and face (surely without those friends really meaning to suggest to me that I buy the things advertised). I don't like any of the other ads either, and mostly find them completely irrelevant to my interests. I have a friend who used to take elaborate steps to hide keywords in his wall posts (for example, he would use non-ASCII characters to respell words referring to politics or religion), but whether a person does a little or a lot to confuse Facebook, Facebook seems just plain clueless about what kind of ads to serve up, and increasingly clueless about how to provide a satisfactory user experience in general.<p>Prediction: Facebook will go the way of AOL, still being a factor in the industry years from now, but also serving as an example of a company that could never monetize up to the level of the hype surrounding it.
评论 #4279900 未加载
waterlesscloud将近 13 年前
I loaded Facebook when I read this, and I have 3 ads on my timeline page. All 3 are appropriate to my interests.<p>One of them is for an independent film currently in theaters. Like newspaper ads for movies, it's more an "awareness" thing than a call to click.<p>One seems to be an app for "news geeks" to see what's most shared on Facebook right now. Interesting, though I''m not immediately anxious to click on it. Still, I now know it's something that exists.<p>The other is an ad for CalTrans for a fanpage for a study they're conducting on a particular Los Angeles transportation route.<p>All targeted to me, all at least sort of interesting. All things I'd <i>never</i> search for or have turn up in a google ad.<p>It's better than it has been.
评论 #4279296 未加载
评论 #4279340 未加载
tatsuke95将近 13 年前
&#62;<i>"“You would much rather hear a message from your friend than hear a message from a brand,”"</i><p>Not sure I believe this. I guess it depends on the context of <i>friend</i>.<p>Sure, maybe if one of my best friends has something to recommend, I'll listen to what he has to say. But chances are it's going to happen <i>in person</i>. If he has a cool shirt? I'll see him wearing it. If he has a new car he loves? I'll go for a drive with him. And if he tries to give me advice on something I know he's clueless about, I'll ignore him.<p>However, what do I care if a "friend" on Facebook exclaims that they've been using some new product, and they love it? If I don't know this person well enough to speak with them in real life, their opinion is nearly worthless to me. I think I'd rather just listen to the branding.
评论 #4279338 未加载
评论 #4279368 未加载
carsongross将近 13 年前
All I know is that a tiny little startup I work for got called, <i>called</i>, by a human, <i>human</i>, at facebook, trying to get us to advertise with them a few weeks ago.<p>Not bullish.
评论 #4279301 未加载
misiti3780将近 13 年前
Link around paywall:<p><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#38;rct=j&#38;q=&#38;esrc=s&#38;source=newssearch&#38;cd=1&#38;ved=0CDIQqQIwAA&#38;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2012%2F07%2F23%2Ftechnology%2Ffacebook-advertising-efforts-face-a-day-of-judgment.html&#38;ei=PsIMUMj7FLKI0QHD1I3vAg&#38;usg=AFQjCNHLNDlD--3Q1XAf7jbAsQ2eespfKg" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#38;rct=j&#38;q=&#38;esrc=s&#...</a>
atpaino将近 13 年前
Kind of tangential to the article, but I often wonder why facebook has not tried the "freemium" model at all. I'm not suggesting they do the typical freemium model, which would be to offer users the option of paying to get rid of ads. Instead, I think they could try charging based on usage (kind of like heroku). They would have to keep the service free for the majority of users, but I think they could get by with charging super-power users; I.e. the ones who can't live without the service. I know many people that would fall into this category, and I'm sure they would be willing to pay $5/month if it meant keeping their facebook.
评论 #4279351 未加载
aaronbrethorst将近 13 年前
Can anyone tell me offhand when Facebook's lockup period for employee stock sales ends?<p>I've always assumed that their stock is going to get hammered when the lockup ends, and I want to be ready for it (i.e. have money in my Fidelity account to snap some up).<p>edit: answered my own question: <a href="http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2012/05/17/facebook-shortens-lock-up-period-for-some-holders/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2012/05/17/facebook-sho...</a>. Approximately August 19.
capkutay将近 13 年前
"There is such disagreement over whether Facebook is the next big thing on the Internet or whether it’s going to fail miserably.”<p>Who are the people having this type of conversation? Why would a company like Facebook, with billions of dollars in revenue and hundreds of millions of users be on track towards "failing miserably"....Simply for being tied to a $100 billion valuation? Perhaps the valuation was lofty but I don't see a company like Facebook outright failing due to greedy investors.
cabalamat将近 13 年前
If you want to read the article without a nag screen, go via the Google link: <a href="https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Facebook+Efforts+on+Advertising+Face+a+Day+of+Judgment&#38;ie=utf-8&#38;oe=utf-8&#38;aq=t&#38;rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;channel=fflb" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Facebook+Efforts+on+Advert...</a>
kposehn将近 13 年前
I read these articles and just /sigh<p>While it is true that they will need to show their ability to grow, FB ads are already a proven platform that many advertisers have built staggering success on.<p>I say we just leave that alone and focus on the growth of the platform - that is what matters most. They are already proven to work.