TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Federal Court (Finally) Rules Backdoor Searches of Data Unconstitutional

354 点作者 janandonly4 个月前

9 条评论

superkuh4 个月前
It's funny that even though the court ruled it is against the law to do so the federal agencies will continue to commit this crime (FBI) and pass illegal legislation (congress) until each specific agency changes it's internal regulations. If they do. The EFF seems to imply continued pressure is needed to convince them to do so.
idrathernot4 个月前
Even if congress ends their blatantly unconstitutional endorsement of Section 702 spying, I still don’t see why anyone would believe that the government is going to do anything other than massively expand their ability surveil every living moment of our lives. I don’t see the point in them trying to play it off like the system has any integrity whatsoever.
评论 #42799785 未加载
评论 #42801612 未加载
npvrite4 个月前
Can we all stop pretending that they don&#x27;t abuse of their power and hold your deepest darkest secrets indefinitely? Even though most of us are law abiding citizens.<p>Can we please start making open hardware without Apple&#x2F;google backdoors and stop pretending our systems are &quot;secure&quot;.<p>Can we please write all software in Rust and stop using languages that weren&#x27;t designed for security. Yes C is beautiful. Yes it also lets you shoot yourself in the foot.<p>Can we please use distributed systems to avoid censorship or holding our private information in the hands of the rich?
评论 #42799732 未加载
评论 #42799148 未加载
评论 #42799722 未加载
评论 #42799147 未加载
评论 #42800488 未加载
josefritzishere4 个月前
This should not have been so hard.
jmclnx4 个月前
Well I guess of the the US Supreme Court. They seem to get every case these days :(
评论 #42798032 未加载
ARandomerDude4 个月前
&gt; We expect any lawmaker worthy of that title to listen to what this federal court is saying and create a legislative warrant requirement so that the intelligence community does not continue to trample on the constitutionally protected rights to private communications.<p>Sad to say it, but I find it laughable that the intel agencies would suddenly stop if it were illegal (though of course it should be illegal). They operate in secret and anyone in the government who opposes them will commit suicide or suddenly be in possession of child pornography.<p>As New York Sen. Chuck Schumer once told Rachel Maddow on air, “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday of getting back at you.” [1]<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;-gZidZfUoMU" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;-gZidZfUoMU</a>
SpliffnCola4 个月前
Is this because they have full access now to the front door?
treetalker4 个月前
Don&#x27;t worry: SCOTUS will determine that the Framers did not have a history and tradition of protecting metadata, so the Fourth Amendment has no application here; and, furthermore, the Court&#x27;s recent jurisprudence regarding the Executive (<i>dieu et mon droit</i>) necessarily implies that the Government has an extremely compelling interest sufficient to overcome the Fourth Amendment and permit warrantless searches of everyone in the United States and elsewhere.
评论 #42798678 未加载
评论 #42798280 未加载
评论 #42798412 未加载
评论 #42805247 未加载
评论 #42800867 未加载
评论 #42798416 未加载
评论 #42806556 未加载
kittikitti4 个月前
We should go even further and abolish the FBI. They all believe they&#x27;re above the law and have consistently been the enemy of Americans. What success can they even point to?
评论 #42800860 未加载
评论 #42798631 未加载
评论 #42798791 未加载
评论 #42800546 未加载