TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

First Look: Loops, by Pixelfed – Decentralised TikTok Competitor (2024)

186 点作者 evolve2k4 个月前

24 条评论

openrisk4 个月前
Kinda funny to read all these comments looking at a single-person&#x27;s effort and going &quot;he, he, he cannot win against the adtech billions and their addiction machines&quot;.<p>What Pixelfed (and Loops and various other still half baked initiatives) prove is that there is an entire space of very interesting applications that are possible with the technologies of here and now. Bluesky was better resourced but essentially still in the same dwarf category versus big adtech.<p>Some people will take these proof-of-principle efforts to heart and build a beautiful future while others will cling on milking the totally broken paradigms of yesteryear.
评论 #42821361 未加载
评论 #42821344 未加载
评论 #42823579 未加载
评论 #42821633 未加载
评论 #42821622 未加载
bobnamob4 个月前
My impression of the two demographics this targets (ie people that use TikTok and people that want to use decentralised social media) is that the set intersection of the two won’t be anywhere near the critical mass necessary to get a TikTok like algorithm working
评论 #42820805 未加载
评论 #42820848 未加载
评论 #42822414 未加载
yosito4 个月前
Can the word &quot;competitor&quot; really be used to describe something that can&#x27;t compete?<p>It&#x27;s an alternative, one which the world would be way better off adopting, but far from being a competitor, unfortunately.
评论 #42820700 未加载
评论 #42822552 未加载
评论 #42821046 未加载
rosseitsa4 个月前
For me the website is down, but it is on the archive: (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250125101223&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wedistribute.org&#x2F;2024&#x2F;11&#x2F;loops-early-look&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250125101223&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wedistrib...</a>)<p>It feels very hard to find any sort of information on &quot;Loops&quot;. Especially regarding their decentralization model.
评论 #42821468 未加载
评论 #42821801 未加载
skwee3574 个月前
Technological craftsmanship aside, I’m wondering, what’s the use case for these platforms?<p>I don’t debate the value of long form written content (blogs) and video content (YouTube), but even these are mainly polluted with SEO garbage articles, or the same idea in 100 different videos, because the content creation machine needs to keep going.<p>But what’s the real value of short form content like twitter&#x2F;instagram&#x2F;tiktok? You can’t convey a meaningful message in a limited amount words&#x2F;seconds; you can’t use them as a diary or for sharing moments with people you love (I was toying with the idea of staying in instagram just to share pictures with my family, but there is no way I’m going to explain them how decentralized alternatives work); and they don’t have any decent monetization strategy other than ads, which means “influencers”, which means the same thing over again.<p>So why do we keep recreating the same tools but with a twist of “decentralized” (which has no appeal to the average person, aside from some online “anarchist”&#x2F;people who like technology [myself included])? What’s the value other than “for fun”&#x2F;“decentralization”?
评论 #42821704 未加载
评论 #42822373 未加载
评论 #42821661 未加载
评论 #42821528 未加载
评论 #42821510 未加载
gigatexal4 个月前
Good attempt but TikTok also makes people rich. Amassing a huge following and being popular brings brand deals etc.<p>I hope this takes off though.
评论 #42820610 未加载
评论 #42821070 未加载
评论 #42820619 未加载
评论 #42821099 未加载
评论 #42820657 未加载
alecco4 个月前
Site is down for me<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250123192931&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wedistribute.org&#x2F;2024&#x2F;11&#x2F;loops-early-look&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250123192931&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wedistrib...</a>
suraci4 个月前
If I understand correctly, the core value of TikTok lies in its algorithm, which is not mentioned in the article.
评论 #42820845 未加载
评论 #42821485 未加载
评论 #42821084 未加载
评论 #42820548 未加载
angrygoat4 个月前
How are decentralised platforms managing abusive content? TikTok had some bumps in the road maybe five years back with this, but got it under control. I know I don&#x27;t want to be scrolling through video content and see illegal or unethical content.<p>That compliance aspect seems like one thing that pushes us towards centralised architectures for social media, but I&#x27;m guessing that AI models to screen images &#x2F; videos are pretty widely available now and cheaply deployable?
评论 #42821464 未加载
评论 #42821625 未加载
cmt84 个月前
Will this take TikTok&#x27;s (or even Reel&#x27;s) marketshare? No. Will it get enough users to take off in the first place? Also probably not (see bobnamob&#x27;s comment). This is still really awesome. It&#x27;s an awesome app and an even cooler project.
alp1n3_eth4 个月前
I understand the want for these new social networks to be less-controlled and more distributed, but I think there is a line in general for dopamine dependence and algorithmic targeting.<p>TikTok, Reels, YT Shorts, all are a net-drain when it comes to doom-scrolling&#x2F;wasting time. I [[kind of]] understand keeping more traditional methods and making more open versions: Pixelfed (Insta), Bluesky (Twitter), etc. as people want some form of connection, but I don&#x27;t think these short vid platforms should be put on a pedestal.
tempeler4 个月前
If your product is related to media (news, magazines, etc.), that&#x27;s really good for you. because you got the people&#x27;s attention. This is an assertive headline. but if you claim your product is better or equivalent to them. if your product does not meet your claims. This is not good for your product. They just try once and send it to trash urgently. Also, you lose potential users. The main issue here is user trust, not how your competitor is big.
flessner4 个月前
Fundamentally, all social medias have two purposes:<p>1) Connecting with family and friends... for me, messaging Apps already solve that.<p>2) Curating new, exciting and relevant content.<p>What I always find interesting is that most projects try to solve 2) by building a platform that is exactly like the competitor but &quot;decentralized&quot;.<p>If such a system instead runs entirely on the users device the curation could even use data such as browser bookmarks or history without infringing massively on privacy.
评论 #42821681 未加载
captainepoch4 个月前
No faith on a piece of software of the author of the now abandoned Pixelfed, a software that is not finished and still very buggy.
评论 #42825292 未加载
评论 #42824083 未加载
codetrotter4 个月前
Went to the <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;loops.video&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;loops.video&#x2F;</a> and installed the iOS TestFlight version of the app.<p>Tried to create an account. They said they sent me a confirmation link I have to click, but I haven’t received any link and it’s been an hour. It’s not in spam either.
评论 #42833628 未加载
ramon1564 个月前
Could we in theory have an algorithm to promote things like interaction, inclusiveness, culture matching etc?<p>I get that money has to come from somewhere, but I wouldn&#x27;t mind a social network that&#x27;s not focusing on making you stay and scroll.
评论 #42821105 未加载
评论 #42821035 未加载
IYasha3 个月前
Is this a suitable place to import my yet unfinished looping SWFs?
picafrost4 个月前
I am very much in support of offering alternative options to centralized black-box apps with dubious profitability mechanisms. An option that doesn&#x27;t catch on to the tune of a billion+ users is better than an option that never existed. The success of technology scaling to a global amount of users should be weighted also with possible-to-measurable harm.<p>Is there activity in the space of developing open-source social media <i>algorithms</i>? It has been interesting to see Threads and bluesky build integrations with Activity Pub (though there is risk for the embrace-extend-extinguish playbook to be applied against it). Are there similar possibilities for generating algorithmic standards for social media feeds that can be understood as deeply as one wishes to?
nico4 个月前
Website is down. Anyone has a mirror link?
optixyt4 个月前
For me acc system is kinda broken
moffkalast4 个月前
Bröther can finally have all the Lööps they wanted?
ingohelpinger4 个月前
they are censoring as much as classical social media networks. lol.
评论 #42833655 未加载
hnpolicestate4 个月前
TikTok competitor must have a functional live tool for users with over x amount of followers. Lives are very popular. Gifting cuts also help company revenues.
pxoe4 个月前
pixelfed looks like it&#x27;s even worse at being user-friendly and approachable at all than mastodon, and it currently has all the same old problems mastodon did. user journey, onboarding, ease of use, are like they didn&#x27;t even learn from mistakes of others. going to pixelfed website and then trying to get to a profile of someone tells me a lot about the state of that experience, when it can&#x27;t even get the basics of basics right. (like, how to get to a profile on a such network. bizarrely, they don&#x27;t show full handles with instance name in them, even though it simply doesn&#x27;t work in a way that&#x27;d let you get to some profile through just the username alone from every server. you cannot even access profiles in a consistent and straightforward way.) honestly, hopefully it doesn&#x27;t take off, cause it seems just mostly user hostile. even though it&#x27;s free in some ways, it&#x27;s just not better at being usable.
评论 #42821248 未加载