TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Over engineered cars are pushing technicians away

58 点作者 SQL22194 个月前
An interesting video from an auto tech and below text was in the comments that I thought some engineers might appreciate.<p>It wasn&#x27;t engine work, but I worked on a friends Hyundai Elantra that had the bights for the head lights stop working. The car had less than 10k miles on it. Come to find out, all new Elantras use a lens on a servo to adjust the focal point of the light to simulate just having an extra bulb in the head lamp assembly. The servo hooks onto a gear that is made out of ABS with no fiberglass reinforcement so the gear melts half the time after prolonged usage if you commute a long way on back roads at night. Oh by the way, this is one of the only parts not covered on their warranties. I replaced the entire assembly twice for her ($400) before just giving up. I ended up drilling a hole in to the assembly, gluing the lens in place and adding a new fuse and wire lead. Then I ended up having to 3d print an attaching assembly to hold a new light that would serve for brights. I had to figure out how the heck to rewire the servo circuit to trigger a relay instead which was an entire other rabbit hole. The lights have never had a problem minus the occasional bulb replacement since and its been 60k+ miles now. But seriously, why do modern engineers try to reinvent the wheel for everything?? I don&#x27;t even work on cars for a living. I work in software engineering and I see the same thing happening. The same programs need more RAM, more CPU resources just to do the same thing that it did 10 years ago. What does windows 7 do that windows 10 doesn&#x27;t? Why does the same web page need 60MBs to load when it only need 1-3MB 10 years ago. All this bad engineering is going to catch up to us at some point. It really worries me to be honest.<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Op1D7zWwQA8

14 条评论

bri3d4 个月前
I guess I kind of agree with the thesis, although in turn auto technician is gradually becoming an increasingly skilled job and pay is (probably not quickly enough) generally increasing as well. Of course, this is frustrating to consumers as dealer repair costs become astronomical. In some ways the market is working as intended as especially used cars from manufacturers with perceived easier repair and maintenance (Honda, Toyota) now command an enormous premium, at least in the US.<p>The specific comment is terrible, though:<p>&gt; Come to find out, all new Elantras use a lens on a servo to adjust the focal point of the light to simulate just having an extra bulb in the head lamp assembly.<p>It&#x27;s unlikely this adjusts the focal point, it&#x27;s more likely it&#x27;s just a shutter, although this is neither here nor there.<p>Regardless, this is a normal way to construct high beams with HID bulbs and there&#x27;s a real engineering reason for this: HID lights shouldn&#x27;t be short-cycled as they need to warm up before they reach brightness, plus cycling rapidly wears the bulb and ignitors out. So, having a separate bulb is not plausible for HID high beams which need to flip on and off quickly.<p>Some cars with LED headlights _are_ often switching back to simpler housings without shutters and adjustable lenses, since they&#x27;re cheaper and easier to build.<p>This is a case of engineers engineering solutions, not engineers making things &quot;hard&quot; for no reason.
评论 #42872589 未加载
HPsquared4 个月前
Optimizing for cost, weight &amp; performance often comes at the cost of repairability. Buyers compare cars on measurable statistics so they&#x27;ll buy the one that is cheaper, faster etc.<p>Watch a Sandy Munro video and see the design details that get a lot of praise. The gigacasting is a nice example: great for performance and manufacturing, but bad for repair. Or, the car not having a separate floorpan and mounting the seats etc directly to the battery casing. Or the octovalve. These are great for everything except repairability.
评论 #42872199 未加载
matt_s4 个月前
The reason a lot of things appear to be re-invented is that its Resume Driven Development but applied to auto head lights. Or blame product people for needing to come up with something even though the product is probably “done” from a consumer standpoint of fulfilling the needs. Smart refrigerators come to mind.<p>I keep watching stuff on youtube where people find really old cars, like 50-60 years old, and they walk thru what needs fixing to get it running. Sometimes they add some gas to a 50yo engine in a barn find and replace spark plugs and it fires up, its really amazing.<p>Man I sound like my grandfather lamenting about “they don’t build them like they used to”.
评论 #42874009 未加载
daemonologist4 个月前
I love my bicycle for this reason - I can do 100% of the maintenance and repairs myself (short of welding a cracked frame, but I could take everything off and swap it to a new frame). Almost all parts are standardized and available from third parties, even in case the original manufacturer goes under. And of course the whole thing cost less than that headlight assembly.<p>Anyways, I think the reason software follows this path is cost - rather than pay an engineer for optimization you have them work on new fancy features, and just expect the user to buy a faster machine. As computers get faster&#x2F;cheaper this applies more and more.
m4634 个月前
I think cars will become either disposable or large assemblies will need to be replaced in full.<p>I&#x27;m reminded of how the tv repairman disappeared.<p>TVs too integrated to fix easily, too complicated to fix economically.
评论 #42871783 未加载
评论 #42871460 未加载
评论 #42874799 未加载
recursivedoubts4 个月前
I have some faint hope that scout will go the other way:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thedrive.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;scout-wants-to-build-evs-you-can-fix-yourself" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thedrive.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;scout-wants-to-build-evs-you-c...</a>
评论 #42871558 未加载
tonymet4 个月前
Transportation has a higher demand for reliability and maintainability than our entertainment devices.<p>Not every &quot;innovation&quot; is positive. A 2% efficiency gain with 300% maintenance cost and 25% lifespan is a major loss.<p>Let&#x27;s act like responsible engineers here and remember what our job is. We are supposed to be creating tools with longevity &amp; utility that improve welfare. We are not here to create toys and infotainment for people.<p>The tools are in our hands people. Quit placing blame on marketing, customers. Take responsibility for the control that you wield.
评论 #42871891 未加载
holtkam24 个月前
Engineering is just means to an end. In most cases the end is: make money.<p>That typically involves minimizing labor (engineering &#x2F; R&amp;D) costs. That’s why you see solutions implemented in a quick &#x2F; scrappy way even though it’s often obvious a better solution exists from the end user perspective… the chosen solution was the best solution for the actual objective: maximize profits.
RGamma4 个月前
People need to justify their role. As such they change things around or add complexity, even if user benefit is questionable. And why wouldn&#x27;t you add some planned obsolescence for good measure?
neuralRiot4 个月前
The “enshitification” applies to everything, as basic functionality is harder or almost impossible to improve features are added as a sales driver together with lower price points, as you can imagine corners needs to be cut as the metrics take in account sales AND profit. General public doesn’t take in account (they’ve driven to think that way) durability or repairability, they just pay a lease so cars have become disposable.
评论 #42871587 未加载
jcgrillo4 个月前
I was seriously considering buying an Ineos Grenadier because I wanted a nice, modern, safe solid axle 4x4 with decent towing capacity that&#x27;ll last 50 years or so, but the complexity of that B57&#x2F;58 and the ZF 8spd, let alone all the other electronic trash like parking sensors, lane sensors, etc scared me off. Theoretically I might be able to keep it running on that timescale with standalone controllers for the transmission and engine but the complexity is just too much. Also, plastic intake manifold? Lmao.<p>So I bought an 80 Series Toyota. It only gets 1mpg less than the Grenadier. 30 years, all that complexity, and we gained 1mpg.<p>I&#x27;m working on a 1HZ-T swap. So I&#x27;ll have a 1 wire engine with a nice simple aftermarket transmission controller, and an exhaust brake. I should be getting around 20mpg hwy when that&#x27;s done and 100k+mi from a set of brake pads. I&#x27;m confident I&#x27;ll be able to keep this running for 50yr.
评论 #42871888 未加载
评论 #42871880 未加载
onetokeoverthe4 个月前
But seriously, why do modern engineers try to reinvent the wheel for everything??<p>this x1000.<p>80%￶ of everything done since &#x27;01 has been the result of crap makework bullshit jobs.
评论 #42872074 未加载
评论 #42871732 未加载
submain4 个月前
&gt;What does windows 7 do that windows 10 doesn&#x27;t? Why does the same web page need 60MBs to load when it only need 1-3MB 10 years ago.<p>Ads. And tracking code to serve you ads. And AI - that collects your prompts to serve you more ads.<p>\s
billy99k4 个月前
This is also why all of the auto union are against electric cars. Some person working in their garage will no longer be able to work on cars and get a job as a mechanic&#x2F;technician and instead will need to have the experience of an engineer.<p>It&#x27;s very similar to the horse&#x2F;buggy and car arguments of years past.
评论 #42871514 未加载
评论 #42871612 未加载
评论 #42830499 未加载