TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

FTC takes action against GoDaddy for alleged lax data security

315 点作者 luu3 个月前

16 条评论

ziddoap3 个月前
It&#x27;s amazing that (approximately) no one cares about stuff like this.<p>GoDaddy was severely breached several times over several years, yet they still rake in billions of revenue from their millions of customers. Now they have to pay someone to fill out a biennial checklist and... promise to not lie. Awesome.<p>If you own a company, why even bother with security? Security is expensive. Wait until a breach is exposed, offer $10 credit monitoring (at best), accept the free press coverage, <i>maybe</i> pinky promise to not lie if you&#x27;ve been particularly egregious in your handling of multiple incidents, and then carry on like normal. (This is tongue-in-cheek, I work in security, but I am frustrated with how often stories like this one occur)
评论 #42853531 未加载
评论 #42856677 未加载
评论 #42858361 未加载
评论 #42853659 未加载
评论 #42857606 未加载
评论 #42856761 未加载
评论 #42853833 未加载
评论 #42862128 未加载
评论 #42857131 未加载
评论 #42857728 未加载
评论 #42859359 未加载
评论 #42854912 未加载
评论 #42859717 未加载
calibas3 个月前
GoDaddy is one of the sleaziest companies I know of.<p>I ran a website hosted on GoDaddy for a local business when the server cluster was hacked. GoDaddy admitted it was their fault, but the business ended up having to pay me to fix the site. GoDaddy also managed to convince the business to pay for an additional monthly &quot;security&quot; plan, which included page caching. They set everything up over the phone without talking to me at all.<p>The next day I notice some odd behavior with the admin pages, then realize they&#x27;re being cached, not only that but they&#x27;re now <i>publicly accessible</i>. GoDaddy&#x27;s improved security plan ended up being responsible for a data leak. They really screwed up twice but there was zero penalty, the only consequence was they made more money. The business chose to stay with GoDaddy, despite my recommendations. They saw the ads on TV and were convinced GoDaddy is the pinnacle of web hosting.<p>Also, check this out: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.butterflyave.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.butterflyave.com&#x2F;</a><p>Those assholes have parked my old business name, and want to sell it back to me for $1,499.
评论 #42862204 未加载
tkems3 个月前
I was shocked when I purchased a domain recently on GoDaddy (I normally use Cloudflare or AWS) and noticed that they have an &#x27;upsell&#x27; with more security options (MFA and some other features) for something like $10&#x2F;yr. Why wouldn&#x27;t they want their customers to be more secure by default? To me it just reeks of money-grabbing for people that are none the wiser.
评论 #42854098 未加载
评论 #42861010 未加载
评论 #42862394 未加载
sethammons3 个月前
SendGrid, pre IPO, had a GoDaddy security incident: someone social engineered one of the GoDaddy support reps into giving them control of our domain. We were able to re-secure the domain before the attacker fully locked us out. They could have powned all of our email links.
maxclark3 个月前
The FTC action is because GoDaddy claimed to have security when they didn’t - not because they didn’t have security in the first place.<p>Subtle but important difference.<p>Also the remedies include having a complete security program within 90 days IIRC, on what world would anyone think that’s remotely possible?<p>They wouldn’t even have an RFP drafted in 90 days.
评论 #42861153 未加载
josefresco3 个月前
If you think GoDaddy is <i>the most</i> terrible, you have never been exposed to the hell that is Network Solutions.<p>GoDaddy is big, safe and terrible. Network Solutions is big, safe and even worse.
评论 #42858728 未加载
评论 #42859915 未加载
评论 #42859831 未加载
insane_dreamer3 个月前
I can&#x27;t believe GoDaddy is still in business. Shows you can be a horrible company -- borderline scammy back in the day -- and somehow survive.<p>FWIW we&#x27;ve used Gandi for years and very happy with it.
评论 #42859856 未加载
评论 #42855466 未加载
评论 #42858517 未加载
ivoflipse3 个月前
In related news, their ISO 27001 certificate just expired. Seems in line with their overall security posture then <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;img1.wsimg.com&#x2F;&#x2F;Sitecore&#x2F;6&#x2F;1&#x2F;registrar-iso27001-certificate.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;img1.wsimg.com&#x2F;&#x2F;Sitecore&#x2F;6&#x2F;1&#x2F;registrar-iso27001-cert...</a>
评论 #42859693 未加载
dikaio3 个月前
They should be looking into them for buying up all the competitors in domain selling. The bought two of the biggest competitors Dan.com and unregistery. Dan.com charge 9% on a sale of a domain now godaddy is charging 30%. Completely different company since Bob Parsons sold to a couple private equity firms.
james41513 个月前
Firstly, I would say spyrecovery36 @ gm ail com is the only hacker you can go to for positive outcome here. Customer service is great. After reading great reviews about him on almost all the websites i researched on, I hired him to hack my cheating spouse&#x27;s iPhone 14 and trust me when i say he hacked the device and gave me full access to his phone. His services were cost effective, top notch and easy to use. I highly recommend this hacker for any hacking services. Pay for the use of his services and avoid scam stories. stay safe
jmuguy3 个月前
I guess its just the power of advertising but its amazing to me that GoDaddy continues to be a popular solution for hosting, domain registration, etc given their absolute toilet of a reputation.
评论 #42855305 未加载
评论 #42853972 未加载
评论 #42854895 未加载
评论 #42853597 未加载
评论 #42853576 未加载
ficklepickle3 个月前
Are there any security related accreditations for a company that are worth more than the paper they are(n&#x27;t) printed on?
yooo0003 个月前
Moved all my domains to porkbun last year...could not be happier!
josefritzishere3 个月前
I never thought I&#x27;d be a fan of a government agency. But here we are.
评论 #42853225 未加载
noobermin3 个月前
Time for GoDaddy&#x27;s CEO to book a few rooms at Trump Hotel in DC.
honestSysAdmin3 个月前
A good law would be that if a customer&#x27;s data is leaked, any and all revenue that was made with&#x2F;through that customer must be returned to the customer. All of a sudden companies will magically remember how to do half-way sober IT again.
评论 #42860883 未加载