TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Deferred resignation email to federal employees

164 点作者 dnissley4 个月前

14 条评论

ceejayoz4 个月前
I wonder how many spoofed "From: potus@whitehouse.gov" "Subject: Resign" emails they're about to get.
评论 #42861206 未加载
评论 #42861201 未加载
ndiddy4 个月前
Here&#x27;s the OPM guidance memo to department heads about this program: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chcoc.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;OPM%20Guidance%20Memo%20re%20Deferred%20Resignation%20Program%201-28-2025.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chcoc.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;OPM%20Guidance%20Memo%...</a><p>Key quote:<p>&quot;Employees who accept deferred resignation should promptly have their duties re-assigned or eliminated and be placed on paid administrative leave until the end of the deferred resignation period (generally, September 30, 2025, unless the employee has elected another earlier resignation date), unless the agency head determines that it is necessary for the employee to be actively engaged in transitioning job duties, in which case employees should be placed on administrative leave as soon as those duties are transitioned.&quot;
评论 #42892257 未加载
tptacek4 个月前
Federal employees have statutory no-cause termination protection, and the President presumably can&#x27;t simply reclassify the federal workforce as &quot;at-will&quot;.
评论 #42862314 未加载
评论 #42862309 未加载
hn_throwaway_994 个月前
The thing that&#x27;s interesting to me is how the Trump Republicans used tactics so effectively to accuse the Dems, &quot;deep state&quot;, etc. of all this nefarious conduct, and then explicitly embraced that conduct as openly and vigorously as possible. E.g accuse career civil servants of being secretly partisan, and then explicitly kick out anyone who isn&#x27;t loyal to Trump and demand Trump loyalty, countering ~150 years of American policy. Accuse Democrats of stealing an election, and then attempt to violently overturn the results of an election after essentially every claim of election malfeasance was laughed out of court.<p>Even how they painted Biden&#x27;s pardons was pretty brilliant IMO. Trump had already pretty much telegraphed that he would pardon anyone who kissed up to him, and had been explicit about how he would use federal power to seek revenge. So while I was very much against Biden&#x27;s pardon of his family, I&#x27;m sure Biden was probably like &quot;F this shizz, it&#x27;s not like holding the moral high ground is doing anyone any favors.&quot; But now, of course, anyone with Trump&#x27;s blessing will get a pardon regardless of what they do, and they can point to Biden&#x27;s pardons as &quot;Dems did it first&quot;.<p>I think we are truly and surely fucked in the mid-long term - what we&#x27;re going through looks pretty much exactly what all previous empires looked like when they fell into decline. It&#x27;s just kind of stunning to watch with so much transparency.
评论 #42870823 未加载
roland354 个月前
Seems like an Elon email!
评论 #42861249 未加载
评论 #42861490 未加载
评论 #42861316 未加载
unsnap_biceps4 个月前
&gt; The federal workforce should be comprised of employees who are reliable, loyal, trustworthy, and who strive for excellence in their daily work. Employees will be subject to enhanced standards of suitability and conduct as we move forward.<p>Has there ever been a loyalty component to rank and file federal employment before? This seems to go against the meritocracy they claim to want.<p>If you do a great job, anything else shouldn&#x27;t matter...
评论 #42861279 未加载
评论 #42861187 未加载
theyinwhy4 个月前
There is a huge difference between &quot;creating lists for further use&quot; and &quot;offering buyouts&quot;. You sure those lists are only for offering buyouts, just because a notorious liar tells you so?<p>Discussion at reddit: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;fednews&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1ibbbh7&#x2F;this_was_posted_about_opm_in_our_union_chat&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;fednews&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1ibbbh7&#x2F;this_was_p...</a>
jfengel4 个月前
Loyalty to whom? Your spouse? The country? Your immediate supervisor? Your coworkers?<p>It&#x27;s the things that aren&#x27;t said that make it feel so Orwellian.
评论 #42861326 未加载
apexalpha4 个月前
So when they said they would run the government &#x27;like a business&#x27; they actually meant a Private Equity hostile take-over informed by 1970 McKinsey consultants.<p>It&#x27;s day 8. Good luck all.
评论 #42863245 未加载
fooker4 个月前
Wow, I have morbid curiosity about how this will work out.<p>Democrats better hope that this crashes and burns, because if this shows any chance of being effective, we&#x27;re in for a tough authoritarian ride.
12345hn67894 个月前
Related:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42849061">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42849061</a>
swagaccident4 个月前
Has something like this ever happened before? Did it feel this bad last time around?<p>This seems especially spooky.
calrain4 个月前
Future America will understand that you don&#x27;t treat government like a company.<p>The money government spends on salaries is money directly injected back into the economy, it could be seen as a form of social welfare.
评论 #42861169 未加载
评论 #42861238 未加载
评论 #42861436 未加载
评论 #42861300 未加载
andy_ppp4 个月前
Anyone else think it’s likely America ends up without being a meaningful democracy by the end of this? I am skeptical the stated goal is efficiency it’s loyalty to MAGA. Imagine how extreme they will get if you can never vote them out.
评论 #42861527 未加载
评论 #42861478 未加载
评论 #42861705 未加载
评论 #42862091 未加载
评论 #42861432 未加载
评论 #42861386 未加载
评论 #42861640 未加载
评论 #42861397 未加载
评论 #42861561 未加载
评论 #42861851 未加载
评论 #42867121 未加载
评论 #42862273 未加载