TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Compute Engine vs. Amazon EC2: Video Transcoding

169 点作者 Heff将近 13 年前

7 条评论

sp332将近 13 年前
How could transfers from Google to Amazon be so much faster than from Google to Google?
评论 #4287590 未加载
评论 #4289416 未加载
dmv将近 13 年前
This is nice, simple experiment design. However, I'm really surprised they only ran this once - or indicate trial counts and indicate range/distribution. I'd be curious if video transcoding is so consistent that a single measurement is enough to draw a conclusion; certainly network/storage transfer is not. Sure, time and bandwidth are not free...
评论 #4291577 未加载
dpe82将近 13 年前
Google cache: <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://blog.zencoder.com/2012/07/23/first-look-at-google-compute-engine-for-video-transcoding/&#38;hl=en&#38;prmd=imvns&#38;strip=1" rel="nofollow">http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://...</a>
评论 #4287804 未加载
ww520将近 13 年前
The comparison on cost is again on the EC2 on-demand pricing. Reserved pricing or spot pricing would cut that down substantially.
评论 #4289080 未加载
wmf将近 13 年前
Does 8 cores mean 8 cores or 4 cores/8 threads? The documentation is confusing.
评论 #4287785 未加载
评论 #4287683 未加载
评论 #4287719 未加载
radarsat1将近 13 年前
bah, measurements without standard deviations are next to useless...
jcdavis将近 13 年前
Its not a fair comparison, but shouldn't they also be trying/using EC2 GPU instances? I would think a large transcoding service such as zencoder has at least looked into it at some point
评论 #4287589 未加载
评论 #4287630 未加载