TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport

668 点作者 mzmzmzm4 个月前

47 条评论

sib3014 个月前
I just listened to the ATC recording from immediately before the collision. ATC instructs the helicopter to pass behind the CRJ. I’m fairly certain a few minutes before that, ATC instructed the helicopter to maintain visual separation, which is common. They typically ask, “do you have the aircraft in sight” and if you respond in the affirmative they rely on you to maintain safe distance.<p>I should mention that in the recording you can only hear one side of the conversation, so I don’t know whether or not the helicopter said whether or not they had visual contact with the plane they collided with.<p>Either way it doesn’t seem to be the fault of ATC. Of course we’ll know more as additional information becomes available.
评论 #42875192 未加载
评论 #42874694 未加载
评论 #42882077 未加载
评论 #42874683 未加载
评论 #42879933 未加载
评论 #42875015 未加载
twoparachute454 个月前
It wasn&#x27;t a police chopper, it was a military VH-60, also known as a &quot;White Hawk&quot; [1]. It&#x27;s a VIP transport helicopter, the same type that is used to transport the president.<p>~The flight track of the helicopter [2] starts at a property in McLean, VA (edited to remove likely inaccurate info)~<p>The chopper was based out of Fort Belvoir, and based on similar past flight tracks, looks like it probably took off from there too. CNN is reporting that there were 3 soldiers onboard, and no VIPs.<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;simple.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sikorsky_VH-60N_White_Hawk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;simple.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sikorsky_VH-60N_White_Hawk</a><p>2: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;globe.adsbexchange.com&#x2F;?icao=ae313d&amp;lat=38.952&amp;lon=-77.182&amp;zoom=13.8&amp;showTrace=2025-01-30" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;globe.adsbexchange.com&#x2F;?icao=ae313d&amp;lat=38.952&amp;lon=-...</a>
评论 #42875353 未加载
评论 #42874593 未加载
评论 #42874886 未加载
评论 #42874929 未加载
评论 #42874956 未加载
toomuchtodo4 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;2025_Potomac_River_mid-air_collision" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;2025_Potomac_River_mid-air_col...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2025-01-30&#x2F;washington-airport-suspends-take-offs-landings-after-incident" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2025-01-30&#x2F;washingto...</a> | <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.today&#x2F;n1ark" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.today&#x2F;n1ark</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;live-news&#x2F;plane-crash-dca-potomac-washington-dc-01-29-25&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;live-news&#x2F;plane-crash-dca-potomac-was...</a> (CNN live updates)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;flying&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1idbkyd&#x2F;crash_at_dca&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;flying&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1idbkyd&#x2F;crash_at_dc...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;aviation&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1idba8i&#x2F;plane_crash_at_dca&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;aviation&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1idba8i&#x2F;plane_cra...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;aletweetsnews&#x2F;status&#x2F;1884789306645983319" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;aletweetsnews&#x2F;status&#x2F;1884789306645983319</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.liveatc.net&#x2F;kdca&#x2F;KDCA1-Twr-Jan-30-2025-0130Z.mp3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.liveatc.net&#x2F;kdca&#x2F;KDCA1-Twr-Jan-30-2025-0130Z...</a> | <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250130025411&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.liveatc.net&#x2F;kdca&#x2F;KDCA1-Twr-Jan-30-2025-0130Z.mp3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250130025411&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.l...</a> (event starts at 17:25)
评论 #42876170 未加载
评论 #42874549 未加载
nradov4 个月前
Obviously it will take some time for the full accident analysis but there have been quite a few near misses lately due to air traffic controller errors. Flight volume has been growing, airspace near airports is more congested, and controllers are overworked. Eventually all of the &quot;Swiss cheese&quot; holes line up. We&#x27;re going to need to hire more controllers.<p>Also, it appears that one of the aircraft was a military (not police) H-60 Blackhawk helicopter.
评论 #42874983 未加载
评论 #42874487 未加载
评论 #42878815 未加载
评论 #42874980 未加载
评论 #42874469 未加载
bryant4 个月前
Not that being near DC affords me any kind of right to an opinion, but:<p>Given the uptick in near miss incidents across the US the last few years, this is the kind of incident that should&#x27;ve been entirely avoidable through changes in policy from these past events but is also apparently the only kind that can spur along policy changes. I can see a world where the fault is on the VH-60, but absent more information, it would surprise me less to hear that it&#x27;s the fault of the tower.<p>Knowing where AA5342 was in its approach, I see no possibility of the jet being at fault.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flightaware.com&#x2F;live&#x2F;flight&#x2F;AAL5342" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flightaware.com&#x2F;live&#x2F;flight&#x2F;AAL5342</a><p>I&#x27;m drawing a lot of early conclusions but it&#x27;s mostly because I&#x27;m just not surprised. Angry as someone who flies a bunch, but not surprised.
评论 #42874663 未加载
评论 #42874795 未加载
评论 #42882824 未加载
评论 #42887311 未加载
评论 #42877753 未加载
评论 #42874781 未加载
评论 #42874802 未加载
评论 #42875572 未加载
duxup4 个月前
I sometimes wonder about the value of these news stories on forums and social media.<p>It&#x27;s all pretty much wild speculation with several potential causes already mentioned on this forum.<p>News important yes, every rando with a few shreds of factoids speculating, not so much.
评论 #42874984 未加载
评论 #42877660 未加载
评论 #42874854 未加载
评论 #42879619 未加载
评论 #42875032 未加载
评论 #42880189 未加载
评论 #42875197 未加载
评论 #42876052 未加载
评论 #42875009 未加载
评论 #42877534 未加载
7thpower4 个月前
Oh man. I’m in Wichita and am getting a bunch of texts.<p>Texted my friends that fly that route regularly and most have texted back.<p>It can all be gone in an instant, tell those you love what they mean to you.<p>edit: everyone is accounted for
评论 #42875595 未加载
snowwrestler3 个月前
DCA has two runways. The longer runway is aligned with the river’s north&#x2F;south direction at that point, so planes flying the approach to this runway from the south track along the western shore of the river, leaving the eastern shore clear for other aircraft like helicopters. The vast majority of flights on approach from the south [1] use this longer runway.<p>The secondary runway is set at a diagonal NW&#x2F;SE. Planes flying an approach from the south follow the river at first, but then loop out over the eastern shore of the river to line up on that runway. To my eye the radar track of the downed flight follows this path. It’s possible since it was a small plane and only small planes can use the diagonal runway—it’s shorter.<p>I mention this because this track takes planes into airspace that is a) usually clear of commercial airplane traffic, and b) directly over military facilities like Naval Research Lab and Joint Base Bolling, which have significant military helicopter travel.<p>Basically, I wonder to what extent the helicopter pilot was surprised to find an airplane descending in that location.<p>[1] When flights are approaching from the north, the main runway requires a pretty sharp right turn seconds before touching down. Approaches to the diagonal runway from the north take planes almost directly over the Pentagon.
评论 #42877644 未加载
评论 #42879635 未加载
评论 #42881454 未加载
评论 #42878525 未加载
jauntywundrkind4 个月前
Anecdotally, the amount of helicopter &amp; air traffic going on around DC has been absurd this month.<p>My house in DC has calmed down <i>some</i> but we had a bunch of low flying fighters jets &amp; helicopters for a bit. It&#x27;s been wild having the house shaken at noon or 1:00 from pairs of fighter jets!<p>I&#x27;ve had an in-week around Tysons this week, and it&#x27;s been <i>wild</i> seeing pair after pair after pair of helicopter flying east towards the city this week. I&#x27;m normally up there once or twice a week and usually there&#x27;s nothing like this.
评论 #42874905 未加载
GlenTheMachine3 个月前
I work at a Navy installation on the Potomac just south of DCA. As of 10 am EST today there was a moderate police and rescue presence on the water. There is a significant amount of debris visible floating in the river, and the boats are fishing it out piece by piece. The only things in the air are a handful of helicopters, presumably related to the search operation.
mmaunder4 个月前
This will be the worst disaster since Colgan in 2009 which is the crash that upped the hours requirement for ATP pilots from 250 to 1500 even though both pilots had over 1500 hours. I think this is going to be a very big deal and very quickly become a political football. Regardless, this is absolutely awful and extremely unfortunate.
评论 #42875789 未加载
评论 #42875654 未加载
ceejayoz4 个月前
Damn. We’ve avoided a US airliner having a fatal crash since 2009.
评论 #42874508 未加载
评论 #42874812 未加载
评论 #42875097 未加载
评论 #42875109 未加载
zombiwoof3 个月前
I&#x27;m sorry, doesn&#x27;t matter who you support, but to blame DEI or former presidents for this is just shameful.
评论 #42902840 未加载
评论 #42883805 未加载
评论 #42883966 未加载
评论 #42883396 未加载
评论 #42884209 未加载
vman813 个月前
If anyone needs a palate cleanser after listening to a depressing ATC recording, I can recommend this heartwarming first time solo flying teenager dealing with her landing gear coming off after takeoff. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=kZ5q7Iv5wTM" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=kZ5q7Iv5wTM</a>
评论 #42878339 未加载
评论 #42879674 未加载
评论 #42880673 未加载
评论 #42879874 未加载
评论 #42883022 未加载
评论 #42879081 未加载
stall844 个月前
We really can&#x27;t have this type of accident, a midair collision happen anywhere in the United States, much less the nation&#x27;s capital, especially considering the Washington area is some of the highest controlled airspace in the country. DCA has been a high-risk airport really since the jet-age, and I have a feeling this might be the end of it as a major passenger airport (at least for Part 121 operations). DOT&#x2F;FAA are really going to need to step up after this and figure it out, for good. I hope there are survivors but it is really cold in that water right now, look up Air Florida flight 90 for a completely different accident, but in a similar time of the year.
评论 #42875049 未加载
评论 #42880137 未加载
评论 #42876153 未加载
r00fus3 个月前
I wonder if this administration&#x27;s firing of many FAA civil positions and the federal worker &quot;buyouts&quot; are responsible.
评论 #42879108 未加载
评论 #42879045 未加载
评论 #42879067 未加载
评论 #42879234 未加载
teractiveodular4 个月前
To put this in perspective, this is the first fatal crash of a US commercial airliner in 16 years (Colgan Air Flight 3407 on February 12, 2009) and the first fatal commercial airliner crash in the United States in 12 years (since Asiana Airlines Flight 214 on July 6, 2013).<p>We like to throw shade at Boeing, the FAA etc, but this is still an incredible accomplishment, especially given the explosive growth of traffic over those years. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, there were far fewer flights but multiple crashes <i>every year</i> was the norm.
评论 #42878150 未加载
评论 #42877565 未加载
评论 #42875714 未加载
评论 #42877047 未加载
评论 #42880408 未加载
评论 #42877240 未加载
hindsightbias4 个月前
I believe the Marine aviation unit supporting the WH operates from the navy base east across from DCA. You can watch them training from the terminal.<p>Not sure how they or the Army transition the approach ends to the runways, but it’s really close.
JTbane3 个月前
Real talk, the helicopter was operating night VFR, right? How is this safe when the jet is moving extremely fast relative to the chopper and the only separation is a visual reference to some navigation lights?
评论 #42881328 未加载
评论 #42882506 未加载
tjohns4 个月前
Radar replay: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;avgeekjake&#x2F;status&#x2F;1884823071611363833" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;avgeekjake&#x2F;status&#x2F;1884823071611363833</a><p>UHF feed with comms from the military helicopter: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archives.broadcastify.com&#x2F;44114&#x2F;20250129&#x2F;202501292000-281903-44114.mp3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archives.broadcastify.com&#x2F;44114&#x2F;20250129&#x2F;20250129200...</a><p>- 5:41 - AA5342 is given instructions for circling to 33<p>- 6:45 - PAT-25 reports Memorial<p>- 7:06 - Tower gives PAT-25 traffic advisory, PAT-25 reports traffic in sight and requests visual separation<p>- 8:08 - Tower asks PAT-25 if they have the CRJ in sight. PAT-25 again reports traffic in sight and again requests visual separation<p>- 8:23 - Crash occurs
评论 #42875151 未加载
评论 #42875631 未加载
评论 #42875466 未加载
readthenotes14 个月前
The video makes it look like the helicopter crashed into the airplane, not the other way around.
评论 #42874577 未加载
sega_sai3 个月前
For the record:<p>January 20: FAA director fired<p>January 21: Air Traffic Controller hiring freeze<p>January 22: Aviation Safety Advisory Committee disbanded<p>January 28: Buyout&#x2F;retirement demand sent to existing employees
lysace4 个月前
A CRJ700 crashing into a Black Hawk sounds <i>bad</i>. :&#x2F;<p>FR24 shows helicopters from various agencies doing many laps around the site, presumably looking for survivors.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;SykzxUA.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;SykzxUA.png</a>
评论 #42874785 未加载
third_rate_econ4 个月前
Could be a relevant DEFCON talk: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;KYuBf2HpXJg?si=srOl5T6CY6Lg8HZQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;KYuBf2HpXJg?si=srOl5T6CY6Lg8HZQ</a><p>Sounds like maybe the ADSB was on in this case though.
kjellsbells3 个月前
Sad all round, and I hope that the NTSB, who are pretty good at getting to the bottom of things without getting into finger pointing, will do so.<p>That said, DC airspace is complicated as hell. You&#x27;ve got very heavily restricted airspace over the city immediately east. VIP natsec&#x2F;military base facilities on the other side of the Potomac. There are major highways to the north, west, and south of all the approaches. The standard route and safety corridor is along the Potomac river, which is heavily trafficked at all altitudes, with commercial, law enforcement, military, and VIP transport. The CIA is 5 miles up the river and is hardly gonna thank you for dropping out of the sky with no notice. Not an easy place to fly.
andyjohnson03 个月前
PPRUNE has a long thread about the accident at [1]. Usual mixture of perspectives, mostly well informed I think.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pprune.org&#x2F;accidents-close-calls&#x2F;663888-aa5342-down-dca-15.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pprune.org&#x2F;accidents-close-calls&#x2F;663888-aa5342-d...</a>
dmtroyer4 个月前
Are pilots landing at DCA conditioned to ignore TCAS warnings on approach? Would there have been one?
评论 #42877809 未加载
kranke1553 个月前
A real tragedy.<p>Here on HN someone mentioned after a recent (last year) near miss that the US system was overloading the system and that some tragedy might be incoming. Maybe of the most insightful and heart breaking “competency crisis” related posts I’ve encountered.
user_78324 个月前
It’s probably really early to ask, but in case anyone here is knowledgeable and has any idea: why didn’t TCAS help avoid the accident? Isn’t it designed for such situations where 2 aircrafts collide? Do military crafts not have it or something?
评论 #42876106 未加载
评论 #42875741 未加载
评论 #42877848 未加载
nycdatasci3 个月前
AV Herald has a great summary and discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;avherald.com&#x2F;h?article=52374362&amp;opt=0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;avherald.com&#x2F;h?article=52374362&amp;opt=0</a>
reaperman4 个月前
Does anyone have the flight path for the helicopter? (Tail number PAT25). FlightAware doesn&#x27;t show it but it might have been tracked by open source ADS-B receivers.<p>This helicopter was often utilized for VIP transport.
评论 #42874765 未加载
评论 #42874596 未加载
Yeul3 个月前
&quot;Trump blames diversity rules under his predecessors, saying he believes people were hired for air traffic control roles who were not qualified - but offers no evidence for this&quot;<p>From the BBC. I swear to god they made 4chan president of America.
评论 #42880457 未加载
TheRealPomax3 个月前
&quot;Commercial jet collides with helicopter during landing&quot;, while not the article title, would be <i>far</i> more accurate.
deadbabe4 个月前
Gruesome, in a crash like this, if there were any survivors from the impact, the water would likely have finished them off.
评论 #42874667 未加载
gepardi3 个月前
Why is a Blackhawk helicopter Performing a “training flight” at night very close to DCA?
评论 #42881382 未加载
评论 #42880618 未加载
评论 #42880485 未加载
throw0101c3 个月前
&quot;FAA Got Rid of Its Leader Before D.C. Plane Crash—Thanks to Elon Musk&quot;:<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;newrepublic.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;190942&#x2F;faa-no-leader-dc-plane-crash-elon-musk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;newrepublic.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;190942&#x2F;faa-no-leader-dc-plane-c...</a><p>&quot;FAA Administrator Quit on Jan. 20 After Elon Musk Told Him to Resign&quot;:<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thedailybeast.com&#x2F;faa-chief-michael-whitaker-quit-on-jan-20-after-elon-musk-told-him-to-resign&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thedailybeast.com&#x2F;faa-chief-michael-whitaker-qui...</a><p>&quot;The FAA is facing a major crisis without a leader because Elon Musk pushed him out*<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;603113&#x2F;faa-chief-musk-dc-plane-crash-crisis" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;603113&#x2F;faa-chief-musk-dc-plane...</a>
评论 #42880028 未加载
评论 #42880424 未加载
rich_sasha4 个月前
Maybe not related at all, but I can&#x27;t help but wonder if this is affected by the funding turmoil. Would a less distracted ATC controller prevent this?
评论 #42879407 未加载
mzmzmzm4 个月前
A passenger jet originating from Kansas collided with a Blackhawk helicopter midair near Reagan National Airport on Wednesday night.<p>Flights at the airport have been halted.
johnneville4 个月前
appears to have collided with a helicopter
RA_Fisher4 个月前
Another horrible cost of militarism.
windowshopping4 个月前
The real question, I feel, is whether the current U.S. government as it exists in 2025 is still capable of continuing to improve things, and whether it&#x27;s still putting all the lessons of the past into practice - or whether we were just coasting on a combination of luck and the vestigial safety left to us by the diligence of the past.
评论 #42877834 未加载
评论 #42875837 未加载
评论 #42877287 未加载
hammock3 个月前
I was a controller at DCA for 8 years and this is a normal operation with Helicopters using the Helicopter routes.<p>The problem I see is the controller asked the Helicopter if they had the CRJ in sight, but he never said WHERE HE WAS OR WHAT HE WAS DOING! The controller should have told the Helicopter that the CRJ was circling to RWY 33. The helicopter said he had him in sight, but he really had the Jet in sight that was landing on RWY 1.<p>Had the controller told him: Traffic ahead and to your left landing runway 33 is a CRJ report him in sight, then the helicopter crew would have LOOKED to their left and saw him. They unfortunately were looking straight ahead at a different plane.<p>The controller is going to take a major blame for this one unfortunately for not being more detailed. Those Helicopters literally fly directly in the path of those RWY 33 arrivals so as a controller you have to be EXACT!!!!<p>Another problem I see is the expectation bias. As controllers in that scenario, we want to hear the Helicopter say &quot;traffic in sight and we will maintain Visual Separation. These Helicopter Pilots know we need to hear them say that (it&#x27;s required), so they will say this just because even though they might not really have the aircraft in sight. They are just saying what we want to hear. If they don&#x27;t, then we stop their forward progress or make them turn out. Comment from instagram
评论 #42879988 未加载
评论 #42880601 未加载
评论 #42880607 未加载
评论 #42883598 未加载
评论 #42878989 未加载
theGnuMe4 个月前
Maybe the military shouldn’t fly training flights there. Just an idea.
评论 #42881821 未加载
wnevets3 个月前
Whose idea was it to gut aviation safety?
outside12343 个月前
The Boeing-ification of the federal government, in which everything is stripped down to below what is actually required to be safe, is in full effect.
gonzo414 个月前
I know that everyone crosses all altitudes during landing. But why don&#x27;t ATC &#x2F; FAA stratify aircraft type and use by altitude. Like all commercial traffic is put in even thousands altitudes. And the Military &#x2F; EMS gets the odd thousands.<p>Its crazy to have things colliding like this.
评论 #42875063 未加载
评论 #42874967 未加载
评论 #42875052 未加载
评论 #42875407 未加载
stall844 个月前
In any event, unless the weather was IMC, where neither aircraft can see because of weather&#x2F;cloud, which I&#x27;m deducing is not the case if they were allowed to maintain visual separation, the ultimate responsibility for maintaining separation is with the pilot(s) .. But as I posted, we should not have this happen anywhere in the United States in 2025 &amp; much less the nation&#x27;s capital. Hopefully DOT and FAA get to work, but I have a feeling that will be the end of DCA&#x27;s usefull life as a major passenger airport.
评论 #42874837 未加载
评论 #42875028 未加载
评论 #42874870 未加载
评论 #42879422 未加载