TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Purely AI-generated art can't get copyright protection, says Copyright Office

41 点作者 SerCe3 个月前

4 条评论

scotty793 个月前
&gt; No matter how many times a prompt is revised and resubmitted, the final output reflects the user’s acceptance of the AI system’s interpretation, rather than authorship of the expression it contains.<p>If the photography was invented today would it be judged to be creative and containing authorship?<p>The art of photography is mostly the art of selection of outputs.<p>How&#x27;s Henri Cartier-Bresson different from prompt engineer when he took hundreds of photos of the same street to ultimately pick his great photos:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;external-content.duckduckgo.com&#x2F;iu&#x2F;?u=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.fstoppers.com%2Fstyles%2Ffull%2Fs3%2Fcomment%2F2021%2F05%2F31%2Fcontactsheetsstoryfeat-800x420.jpg%3Fitok%3DT24mDusa&amp;f=1&amp;nofb=1&amp;ipt=48ef364bdfe001ad7af3601428b7619aff94a3ed446f5fb55ef9e5ab07900f5a&amp;ipo=images" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;external-content.duckduckgo.com&#x2F;iu&#x2F;?u=https%3A%2F%2F...</a>
评论 #42909875 未加载
评论 #42898761 未加载
ErikBjare3 个月前
When is something &quot;purely&quot; AI-generated?
评论 #42898732 未加载
评论 #42914493 未加载
52-6F-623 个月前
Now AI “artists” are worried about protecting their “content”?<p>Lol
评论 #42914520 未加载
FractalHQ3 个月前
Are the AI bro lobbyists asleep at the wheel? I assumed human creativity was already sold to the highest bidder.