The Marco.org Review of John Siracusa’s Review of OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion

&#62; "In my testing, reading the 10.8 review took approximately 128 minutes. But I walked my dog briefly in the middle."<p>&#62; "At medium brightness, my iPad (3rd-generation) battery fell from 73% to 56% while I read the review on it."<p>I... I think I love Marco Arment.<p>A great way to start my day, thanks for the chuckles, Marco.

Marco has perfected the followup blog entry HN spam. Even if it is hilarious and witty.<p>He jumps on a hot topic and gets the page views.

It's just sad that the actual review, which is tremendously interesting and substantial, has noticeably fewer votes than this, the #1 link.<p>Is the oft-mentioned decline of HN a bunch of tiny cuts?

Christ does the HN community give Marco a lot of grief. He's like the LeBron James of this place.

"which Apple invented completely on their own." priceless.

I am honest: I don't get it. Is the reviewed review focused on meaningless metrics or why is this funny? I skimmed through a couple of pages and did not see any of that, in fact it seemed comprehensive if a bit subjective and fanboyish.

Love the graph comparing word lengths of previous OS X reviews.

Has anyone reviewed this review review yet? I don't want to waste my time over here.

Best review of a review ever. A+++ would read again!

Has anyone noticed yet in the real Siracusa review that marco.org is the first link in a screenshot of Siracusa's reading list?<p>Page 8

"There have been a few architectural changes to John Siracusa’s OS X reviews as well. Siracusa has detailed the process in his separate explanatory blog post, because the review wasn’t long enough and he had more to say." HA

It's highly legible!

As amusing as the parody is, it's tough to beat the original. Honestly, who cares about an update to Chess?

I love the fact that his review included code, just something small and trivial like that. Made my day more than slightly better. Can go to bed with a giant smile on my face.

A review of a review?