TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Suspension of inbound parcels from China and Hong Kong

563 点作者 DannyPage3 个月前

46 条评论

reaperman3 个月前
This is going to utterly fuck so many R&amp;D projects at my company. We actually do large-scale manufacturing of industrial valves in the USA. But a lot of our prototyping involves working with Chinese suppliers and getting small batches of samples &#x2F; prototypes &#x2F; revisions sent in packages on airplanes.<p>I literally do not know how the electrical and firmware engineers will do their jobs now if we cannot receive packages from China. It&#x27;s going to halt all our R&amp;D for at least 6 months while we onboard domestic contractor alternatives --- which will also just generally be shit. Not to mention the American contractors WONT BE ABLE TO SHIP IN THE FUCKING ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS FROM CHINA THEY NEED FOR THE PROTOTYPES.<p>Every single R&amp;D department in the USA just got fuuuuuuuuucked by this.
评论 #42945456 未加载
评论 #42943744 未加载
评论 #42946156 未加载
评论 #42943778 未加载
评论 #42949796 未加载
评论 #42944383 未加载
评论 #42943559 未加载
评论 #42945022 未加载
评论 #42947491 未加载
评论 #42946134 未加载
评论 #42945120 未加载
评论 #42948745 未加载
评论 #42944041 未加载
评论 #42948692 未加载
评论 #42944090 未加载
评论 #42949291 未加载
评论 #42950259 未加载
评论 #42944438 未加载
评论 #42944874 未加载
评论 #42945236 未加载
评论 #42944658 未加载
评论 #42944277 未加载
评论 #42944042 未加载
评论 #42944546 未加载
评论 #42949193 未加载
评论 #42945763 未加载
评论 #42944893 未加载
评论 #42944726 未加载
评论 #42943526 未加载
评论 #42944010 未加载
评论 #42944615 未加载
评论 #42943735 未加载
dmd3 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international&#x2F;suspension-of-inbound-parcels-from-china-and-hong-kong.htm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international...</a><p>Restored already. It&#x27;s all about chaos.
评论 #42948823 未加载
评论 #42953301 未加载
评论 #42949530 未加载
评论 #42948714 未加载
评论 #42952895 未加载
评论 #42950079 未加载
ggm3 个月前
Anyone got a non-intuited, horses-mouth reason why? I suspect (ie, intuit) that its actually an attack on the USPS, not on China. The party of government doesn&#x27;t like the post office, and this is to teach us not to like the post office either.<p>I guess if they stopped using electric cars, they might like the post office again.
评论 #42948487 未加载
评论 #42944294 未加载
评论 #42945069 未加载
评论 #42944955 未加载
评论 #42944896 未加载
评论 #42944842 未加载
bbarnett3 个月前
Unless I&#x27;ve missed a thread, no one seems to be saying what counts.<p>Changing duties, taxes, and rules is fine. It&#x27;s how a society adjusts. Changing them <i>instantly</i> is literally the most anti-consumer, anti-business concept ever.<p>No 30 days? 90 days? Nope, block it all now! That&#x27;s sheer stupid on a caliber almost unheard of. It sends a signal &quot;Don&#x27;t do business with the US, the rules change on a whim&quot;. Don&#x27;t do business IN the US, the same!<p>Set up a company anywhere else, any other nation, else you&#x27;ll wake up tomorrow and your entire business model is invalidated, without even a day to adjust.<p>This is how children behave. How over emotional, non-rational people behave.<p>Unfortunate.<p>I personally support this, but not <i>immediately</i>. Nutty.
评论 #42947661 未加载
markus_zhang3 个月前
I sincerely hope US and Canada can regrow some manufacturing capacity. I think the only way to do it is by a one-two punch, and middle class like me are going to seriously get hurt, but I still want it done, for the sake of later generations and for a better, safer, more competitive humanity. Safer because a successful reform removes the need of a world war.<p>The one-two punch is:<p>1) A massive devaluation of housing, stocks and other similar items. The reason for this is we need to introduce local, more affordable merchandises, which can only be brought by cheaper lands, cheaper labor -- but no one is going to work $6 an hour (about 45 Yuan per hour, more or less on par with the better paid Chinese manufacturers I think) unless, unless housing and renting costs a fraction, like, 20%. That&#x27;s why I said we are going to get seriously hurt. This is basically a wealth transfer from the richer to the poorer.<p>2) Educate a whole generation that labor is honorable, so that engineers, scientists, technicians and such get more respect (I mean real respect, not the superficial one nowadays) than lawyers and bankers. It&#x27;s a social change that takes at least one generation, perhaps two. Maybe I didn&#x27;t put it right, but by saying getting more respect I&#x27;m basically saying getting an equal pay and equal say.<p>But I&#x27;m seeing is that US is taking another darker road.
评论 #42947785 未加载
评论 #42947853 未加载
评论 #42947937 未加载
评论 #42950182 未加载
评论 #42958681 未加载
评论 #42950505 未加载
Animats3 个月前
You can still ship stuff from China to the US via FedEx, UPS, or DHL. You just have to do all the standard customs clearance data entry and pay.[1]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;02&#x2F;04&#x2F;business&#x2F;china-us-usps-de-minimis.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;02&#x2F;04&#x2F;business&#x2F;china-us-usps-de...</a>
评论 #42946687 未加载
ndom913 个月前
Looks like they&#x27;ve flip flopped already:<p>&gt; Effective February 5, 2025, the Postal Service will continue accepting all international inbound mail and packages from China and Hong Kong Posts. The USPS and Customs and Border Protection are working closely together to implement an efficient collection mechanism for the new China tariffs to ensure the least disruption to package delivery.
评论 #42950833 未加载
bb883 个月前
So if you&#x27;re worried about packages coming from AliExpress, you probably shouldn&#x27;t be. The last several packages I ordered were shipped USPS with an origin of the US. Los Angeles was the origin of the last one I received with AliExpress Choice(tm).<p>It may affect ebay purchases of electronic parts from Shenzhen though. Particulary if the vendors use the Chinese post office.<p>I also ordered a Keychron keyboard last weekend and it&#x27;s being shipped from Shenzhen via DHL.
评论 #42943180 未加载
评论 #42943291 未加载
评论 #42943649 未加载
评论 #42958455 未加载
评论 #42944367 未加载
评论 #42946689 未加载
tkems3 个月前
I can confirm that Aliexpress doesn&#x27;t allow me to checkout with a USA address and states that items can&#x27;t be shipped to my region. -edit: Since this post it seems that I can order items again? Very odd.
评论 #42944947 未加载
评论 #42945659 未加载
评论 #42946611 未加载
评论 #42944913 未加载
xnx3 个月前
Bad for consumers, but seems like a very good thing for AMZN?<p>Amazon won&#x27;t have to compete against the much cheaper Temu, Aliexpress, Shein(?) etc.
评论 #42942763 未加载
评论 #42942915 未加载
评论 #42942809 未加载
评论 #42943540 未加载
评论 #42942739 未加载
评论 #42948669 未加载
评论 #42944974 未加载
nico3 个月前
The speed at which all of this is happening is astounding<p>Is this all improvised or was there a big list of stuff to do ahead of time?<p>If the latter, does anyone have a copy of that list?<p>Alternatively, is anyone keeping track of what&#x27;s already been done so far?
评论 #42943520 未加载
评论 #42944386 未加载
评论 #42945787 未加载
评论 #42958741 未加载
评论 #42944833 未加载
Scoundreller3 个月前
How’s it work in the US these days with AliExpress (and I guess Temu) last-mile delivery?<p>In Toronto, most of those items are coming to me by private courier (and this pre-dates the Canada Post strike).
评论 #42942593 未加载
评论 #42943363 未加载
The_suffocated3 个月前
The linked page is about a different notice. The correct webpage (that the linked page has linked to) is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international&#x2F;suspension-of-inbound-parcels-from-china-and-hong-kong.htm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international...</a><p>By the way, can anybody explain what&#x27;s the significance about this submission?
评论 #42942420 未加载
评论 #42943989 未加载
casenmgreen3 个月前
1. Current administration are wholly unfit for purpose; they have no clue about running a Government.<p>2. A dictator is now in place, with a subverted democratic system underneath (by subverted I mean deceived - enough people have bought into the lies that elections are now democratic in appearance only).<p>3. The judicial system is now in the way.<p>4. The judicial system is now going to be attacked.
hpone913 个月前
Looks like everything will be hit by the MPF<p>What is a Merchandise Processing Fee? The Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF) is a user fee that the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) charges. It is charged in addition to US Customs duty as an ad valorem tax at a rate of .03464%. It is calculated as a percentage of the value of the shipments shown on the invoice, also known as the Customs appraisement. This user fee carries a minimum and maximum amount depending on the entered value of the shipment. MPF is required on informal (goods valued $2,500.00 USD or less) and formal (goods valued over $2,500.00 USD) entries into the US.<p>Informal MPF Rates Rate: $2.53 USD<p>Formal MPF Rates Minimum: $32.71 USD Maximum: $634.62 USD (And under Trump&#x27;s decree, all mail from China must be labeled as formal goods now, so minimum $32.71 fee applies)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;public-inspection.federalregister.gov&#x2F;2025-02293.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;public-inspection.federalregister.gov&#x2F;2025-02293.pdf</a>
评论 #42944441 未加载
评论 #42944962 未加载
anomie313 个月前
Could an expert mention if this violates the Universal Postal Convention?
评论 #42944161 未加载
评论 #42944001 未加载
nkurz3 个月前
The suspension has already been suspended. Packages are again being accepted for delivery:<p>&quot;Effective February 5, 2025, the Postal Service will continue accepting all international inbound mail and packages from China and Hong Kong Posts. The USPS and Customs and Border Protection are working closely together to implement an efficient collection mechanism for the new China tariffs to ensure the least disruption to package delivery.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international&#x2F;suspension-of-inbound-parcels-from-china-and-hong-kong.htm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international...</a>
anigbrowl3 个月前
Guess my little stash of ESP32 devices just doubled in value.
评论 #42944272 未加载
drivingmenuts3 个月前
Oh, look! We&#x27;ve cut off shipments from China! Now you&#x27;ll have to buy American.<p>News flash: we can&#x27;t afford to buy American. Why do you think we were shopping there. It&#x27;s too late to fix it now - we no longer have the money or the ability to make the money to buy American and even if you gave more money to Americans, prices would just increase accordingly.<p>Also, some of those products were paid for already. Someone owes the purchasers reimbursement for their loss.
评论 #42942866 未加载
评论 #42942878 未加载
jschveibinz3 个月前
Fentanyl is the likely reason behind this order:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.house.gov&#x2F;meetings&#x2F;GO&#x2F;GO24&#x2F;20230517&#x2F;115956&#x2F;HHRG-118-GO24-20230517-SD004.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.house.gov&#x2F;meetings&#x2F;GO&#x2F;GO24&#x2F;20230517&#x2F;115956&#x2F;HHRG...</a><p>USPS is the preferred carrier for illicit drug distribution.
评论 #42944568 未加载
评论 #42945858 未加载
评论 #42944387 未加载
persedes3 个月前
I&#x27;m unclear on this, but to my understanding if I order of Temu, Aliexpress etc I forfeit any consumer rights that I might have in the country I reside in? E.g. if the cheap stuff burns down my house &#x2F; takes out my eye [1], there&#x27;s no one to blame about gross defects &#x2F; QC oversight?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.geekwire.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;lawsuit-ruling-dog-leash-purchased-amazon-greatly-impact-third-party-seller-business&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.geekwire.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;lawsuit-ruling-dog-leash-purch...</a>
评论 #42944513 未加载
评论 #42944078 未加载
评论 #42945116 未加载
评论 #42947916 未加载
ChrisArchitect3 个月前
Updated Feb 5, 2025:<p>&gt; <i>Effective February 5, 2025, the Postal Service will continue accepting all international inbound mail and packages from China and Hong Kong Posts.</i>
sidewndr463 个月前
This appears to be the end of my hobbies as there are just so many small parts I can&#x27;t possibly get in the US but are available for $6 on AliExpress
评论 #42948687 未加载
评论 #42948563 未加载
dbetteridge3 个月前
&gt; Effective February 5, 2025, the Postal Service will continue accepting all international inbound mail and packages from China and Hong Kong Posts. The USPS and Customs and Border Protection are working closely together to implement an efficient collection mechanism for the new China tariffs to ensure the least disruption to package delivery.<p>Looks like its changed since posting
sam3453 个月前
That didn&#x27;t last long they did say it was temporary. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;logistics&#x2F;u-s-postal-service-suspends-shipments-of-china-parcels-bf6239f3?st=ijq89q" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;logistics&#x2F;u-s-postal-service-su...</a>
qwertox3 个月前
EU should do the same. They&#x27;re essentially performing a Bureaucratic Denial-of-Service attack on customs and tax authorities.
评论 #42947712 未加载
评论 #42946786 未加载
评论 #42946674 未加载
keuoa_3 个月前
I had several small packages in transit from china, now that the CBP considers ALL packages from China &quot;formal&quot; I have to pay $32.71 PER PACKAGE. I&#x27;m freaking screwed, I can&#x27;t really afford to drop several hundred dollars just on bullshit fees
abrookewood3 个月前
Any idea why?? Presumably the tariff&#x2F;trade debate?
评论 #42942803 未加载
评论 #42942645 未加载
评论 #42944096 未加载
评论 #42942701 未加载
评论 #42942662 未加载
评论 #42943188 未加载
评论 #42945541 未加载
评论 #42942581 未加载
评论 #42942826 未加载
评论 #42942499 未加载
steveBK1233 个月前
I am paying less attention to minor day to day news drama during the orange mans second reign, but even then it feels more chaotic this time.
tempeler3 个月前
I know this movie very well from somewhere, but the ending is both unhappy and bad. But you are lucky, it does not last longer than 4 years.
fsagx3 个月前
I have a jclpcb job that finished today :o<p>2025-02-06 01:52:00 Shipment information received,ZHUJIANG DELTA AREA - CHINA, PEOPLES REPUBLIC
评论 #42988258 未加载
stronglikedan3 个月前
It&#x27;s good that people are making dumb decisions like this, presumably out of spite. Makes it easy to know who to fire.
thesaintlives3 个月前
Maybe he is going to take a hard look at why this service is subsidised bu the US tax payer...
dahdum3 个月前
Wouldn’t this be due to the Lunar New Year, a massive holiday that shuts down wide swaths of the country? UPS has a bunch of Asia delays right now too.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ups.com&#x2F;cn&#x2F;en&#x2F;service-alerts.page" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ups.com&#x2F;cn&#x2F;en&#x2F;service-alerts.page</a>
评论 #42942503 未加载
评论 #42944044 未加载
gorbachev3 个月前
And now they reversed it:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;02&#x2F;04&#x2F;business&#x2F;usps-china-de-minimis.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;02&#x2F;04&#x2F;business&#x2F;usps-china-de-mi...</a><p>What a flustercuck.
gigel823 个月前
There goes AliExpress...
davesque3 个月前
Does anyone know why this is happening? A result of some initiative by the Trump administration probably?
评论 #42944282 未加载
alistairSH3 个月前
And they&#x27;ve already walked that back... <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international&#x2F;suspension-of-inbound-parcels-from-china-and-hong-kong.htm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.usps.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;service-alerts&#x2F;international...</a><p>What a dumpster fire. Hard to believe ~half the electorate thought electing Trump, Musk, and army brocoll-topped tech-bros was a good idea.
评论 #42948537 未加载
caspper693 个月前
The parade of stupid continues unabated.
throwfgtpwd2343 个月前
This is complete crap. There was no warning given. And isn&#x27;t this illegal?
Ginger-Pickles3 个月前
Dupe: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42942236">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42942236</a>
评论 #42944000 未加载
antigeox3 个月前
Fully support this move. America needs to build.
评论 #42945474 未加载
NetOpWibby3 个月前
This is a terrible time to be working for a hardware startup<p>JFC
jmclnx3 个月前
Well the page is gone
评论 #42942609 未加载
0xbadcafebee3 个月前
It&#x27;s like the right is doing everything they can to make the country be pissed off at them. Do they understand we still have the power to vote?
评论 #42942880 未加载
评论 #42943394 未加载
评论 #42943535 未加载
评论 #42942904 未加载
blackeyeblitzar3 个月前
Good. I&#x27;m glad to see moves that reduce market access for China, given there is little reciprocity. It&#x27;s also worth hurting the Chinese economy for numerous other geopolitical reasons, including that the American economy can absorb disruptions like this a lot more easily at this time.