"Open Source" itself is already a re-definition.<p>The creation and deployment of the GPL license was touted as "free software".<p>While "Open Source" uses the same licenses, the motivation is completely different. Profit .vs User Freedom.<p>Why should institutional users of s/w create there own and share it, when vendors who will collect billions over the lifetime of their users will "give" "free" versions of the s/w to them?<p>It's like giving the school children free heroin and calling it philanthropy...<p>p.s. In my youth, big tobacco did in fact hand out free cigarettes outside of the high school...