TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Noether's Theorem Revolutionized Physics

139 点作者 MindGods4 个月前

15 条评论

ruuda4 个月前
John Carlos Baez on that article: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mathstodon.xyz&#x2F;@johncarlosbaez&#x2F;113964127171705485" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mathstodon.xyz&#x2F;@johncarlosbaez&#x2F;113964127171705485</a>
评论 #42989911 未加载
评论 #42990317 未加载
评论 #42989216 未加载
评论 #42989425 未加载
评论 #42989831 未加载
immmmmm4 个月前
The beauty and power of the Noether Theorem is what pushed me to theoretical physics.<p>I consider it one of mankind’s greatest achievement.
Isamu4 个月前
I recommend the book Einstein’s Tutor” which came out last year.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lee-phillips.org&#x2F;noether&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lee-phillips.org&#x2F;noether&#x2F;</a><p>This is probably the best layman’s approach to Noether, her impact, and how she probably didn’t think much about the theorem later because she wasn’t interested in physics and abstract mathematics was her consuming passion.
评论 #42993340 未加载
btilly4 个月前
Here is a cosmological issue from Noether&#x27;s Theorem. An expanding universe shows time asymmetry, therefore it might not have conservation of energy.<p>This looks like it actually happens. Photons going through empty space go through cosmological redshift, reducing their energy over time. The energy does not appear to go anywhere - it is just gone.<p>I have no idea why this example is not more widely discussed.
评论 #42992350 未加载
评论 #42992344 未加载
评论 #42992902 未加载
评论 #42993432 未加载
评论 #42993355 未加载
评论 #42994558 未加载
twiceaday4 个月前
TLDR: Do an experiment, then move 10 meters to the left (or rotate 90 degrees, or wait a few days) and do it again. The results don’t change, because the laws of physics don’t change. This realization alone is enough to produce conservation laws. Translational and rotational symmetries produce conservation of linear and angular momentum, and the time symmetry produces conservation of energy. Each symmetry you find leads to new physics.<p>It&#x27;s such an aha moment.<p>PBS Space Time: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=04ERSb06dOg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=04ERSb06dOg</a>
评论 #42989622 未加载
评论 #42989332 未加载
评论 #42989293 未加载
评论 #42990463 未加载
PopePompus4 个月前
I&#x27;ve never understood why Marie Curie is so celebrated in the popular press, but Noether is largely ignored. Noether&#x27;s work is much more important, IMHO.
评论 #43006405 未加载
评论 #43012525 未加载
adastra224 个月前
“Noether” nominative determinism strikes again in physics.
bmacho4 个月前
&gt; In the fall of 1915, the foundations of physics began to crack. Einstein’s new theory of gravity seemed to imply that it should be possible to create and destroy energy, a result that threatened to upend two centuries of thinking in physics.<p>Not just seem to imply, but they do imply[0]. Does that mean that we can build a machine that generates energy and negentropy forever (e.g. an artificial Sun), thus, we can outlive the heat-death of the rest of the Universe? Yes, absolutely. But there are other existential threats, like the collapse of false-vacuum. In the end, it is not known if we have limited or unlimited time here, but Noether&#x27;s theorem doesn&#x27;t answer that.<p>[0] : <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=general+relativity+and+conservation+of+energy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=general+relativity+and+conse...</a>
评论 #42992193 未加载
评论 #42989770 未加载
pfdietz4 个月前
It&#x27;s sad she died when she did. Had it been a few years later penicillin would likely have saved her.
jakobschwich4 个月前
Not much meat in the article unfortunately. Far too short to contain anything substantial
jll294 个月前
If you would like to know more about her:<p>Her legacy <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mathgenealogy.org&#x2F;id.php?id=6967" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mathgenealogy.org&#x2F;id.php?id=6967</a><p>About her <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Emmy_Noether" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Emmy_Noether</a><p>Where she lived and studied <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thonyc.wordpress.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;05&#x2F;07&#x2F;the-house-where-emmy-lived&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thonyc.wordpress.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;05&#x2F;07&#x2F;the-house-where-emmy...</a>
bawana4 个月前
The article begins with claims of violation of conservation of energy but no examples. Then it posits that violations of energy conservation are explained by symmetries. What does that mean in English? Is there something else that changes in concert with changes of energy?
评论 #43002992 未加载
dist-epoch4 个月前
What about information? We know that it is conserved, so what is the corresponding symmetry?
评论 #43012610 未加载
评论 #42994713 未加载
评论 #42990908 未加载
MeteorMarc4 个月前
Obligatory: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;physicsmemes&#x2F;comments&#x2F;gtzprh&#x2F;noethers_theorem&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;physicsmemes&#x2F;comments&#x2F;gtzprh&#x2F;noethe...</a>
ElDji4 个月前
&quot;Like most Jewish academics in Germany, Emmy Noether was fired after the Nazis came to power in 1933. She left later that year for Bryn Mawr College in the U.S [...]&quot;<p>Compared to what&#x27;s happening now, it&#x27;s totally frightening.
评论 #42989756 未加载
评论 #42994675 未加载