TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

DOGE member previously fired by cybersecurity firm for leaking company secrets

97 点作者 strangeloops853 个月前

7 条评论

toomuchtodo3 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.today&#x2F;S70JE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.today&#x2F;S70JE</a>
disposition23 个月前
&gt; The White House wouldn&#x27;t comment directly on Coristine&#x27;s employment, but an official who discussed the situation on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters said all DOGE staffers under Musk were working as employees of relevant agencies with security clearances.<p>It sounds like they might want to review how they are doing security clearance reviews (assuming they aren&#x27;t just a blank check for this group) if they&#x27;re letting folks like this through
评论 #42977652 未加载
ZeroGravitas3 个月前
Krebsonsecurity reporting suggests that the &quot;cyber security firm&quot; is actually part of a gang of cyber criminals. Story submitted (but flagged and dead) here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42979187">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42979187</a>
thomasdziedzic3 个月前
&quot;He will be brought back. To err is human, to forgive divine.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;elonmusk&#x2F;status&#x2F;1887957783783391423" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;elonmusk&#x2F;status&#x2F;1887957783783391423</a>
评论 #42977378 未加载
skulk3 个月前
off topic (who even cares about the OP) but I heard a clip of Musk saying that &quot;the bureaucracy subverts democracy. I want government by the people, not the bureau&quot; and ... I don&#x27;t even. Do people really fall for this? Is it not obvious that one bureau is just being sub&#x27;d out for another less accountable one? Are people really that stupid?
评论 #42978198 未加载
评论 #42978054 未加载
评论 #42976950 未加载
drweevil3 个月前
So, if a post contains the 4-letter acronym DOGE the Elon hall monitors jump into action and flag it.<p>This is getting tedious, as are the arguments made to justify flagging the posts. &quot;This has already been discussed.&quot; Fine. Start flagging AI posts then. &quot;This has nothing to with tech.&quot; But it has everything to do with tech, and one of the most influential players in tech, and how hubris blinds techies into thinking that they have tech answers to all problems (a bit of Dunning-Kruger).<p>Here are the misconceptions behind the entire idea of DOGE:<p>* Government waste is assumed as a given. No citations needed.<p>* Government agencies should be run like a business (or worse, a startup). But government agencies are not businesses. They don&#x27;t have investors. Their mission is not to make a profit. It is to provide a service and a social good, <i>mandated by Congress</i>. Ideological disagreement with that service or good does not make this waste. The idea that entities like the US Post Office operates at a &quot;loss&quot; is arrant nonsense. The value provided is in the service, without the overhead load of investors.<p>* &quot;Government bureaucrats&quot; (said with contempt and disdain). Right wing propaganda notwithstanding, these folk are the domain experts in running a government (see point above). The trend of the last decade or so has been to replace many of the lower levels with call centers and&#x2F;or websites, to the frustration of millions of citizens who require these services.<p>The tl;dr is that the DOGE ppl don&#x27;t have a clue. They are operating on false assumptions, and likely are running roughshod over the law. Bulls in a china shop fits here.
_fs3 个月前
[flagged]
评论 #42977160 未加载
评论 #42977162 未加载