TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

No AI December Reflections

54 点作者 sandruso3 个月前

8 条评论

zamadatix3 个月前
I think there is a 3rd mode &quot;I know exactly what I want, I just need this thing to autocomplete 90%+ of it in one shot so I don&#x27;t have to type it all&quot;. Like when you&#x27;re building out a class and you know it needs to have certain variations of constructor, certain types, certain public and private methods, certain ways to iterated and deep copy, certain ways to pretty print and build up the plumbing to tie those to the default printing methods of the language, and so on.<p>It&#x27;s not really the &quot;I don&#x27;t care&quot; mode as you care very much it matches specifically what you want to build out rather than &quot;something which seems to work as a class if I paste it in&quot;. It&#x27;s also not really &quot;I want to learn something here&quot; as you already know exactly what you want and you&#x27;re not looking for it to deviate, you&#x27;re just looking to have it appear a couple times faster than if you typed it out. This is, more or less, &quot;I want faster autocomplete for this task&quot; usage.
评论 #42997516 未加载
评论 #42996470 未加载
评论 #42996791 未加载
评论 #42997927 未加载
评论 #42997780 未加载
000ooo0003 个月前
Last time I asked AI something, it started its response with &quot;Yes, it&#x27;s certainly possible to x with y.&quot; and closed its response with &quot;in conclusion, unfortunately, it&#x27;s not possible to x with y&quot;. In the same session, it told me one must press shift to get the number 1. I&#x27;m simultaneously amazed at its ability to generate what it can and disappointed at how it falls short so routinely. It&#x27;ll get there eventually I&#x27;m sure, but I&#x27;m pretty dubious when people say they get a lot of value out of it.
评论 #42995837 未加载
评论 #42995457 未加载
评论 #42995480 未加载
评论 #42996077 未加载
vladde3 个月前
To me, the problem always seemed like people who use ChatGPT and alike default into the &quot;I don&#x27;t care&quot; mode, and copy-paste blindly.<p>Personally I think this is the root cause of most sloppy AI code. If you just look at the code that was generated, and you don&#x27;t think &quot;I would&#x27;ve come up with that&quot;, then probably the code is wrong.
评论 #42995555 未加载
评论 #42996016 未加载
muglug3 个月前
I’ve been using O1 for some question&#x2F;answering stuff around CMake and symbol resolution — stuff I know little about, yet stuff the internet knows a ton about.<p>O1 has been really useful, but just the practice of putting my convoluted question into words has often helped me figure out the answer without even clicking submit.
评论 #42997527 未加载
deadbabe3 个月前
<i>Give a fuck</i> about what you’re doing. You get paid a lot of money to write quality software. No engineer’s default mode should ever be “I don’t care I just want the end result”. We’re talking about pressing some keys on a keyboard. Do you want other engineering professions to take similar attitudes? Want to trust your life on some machine or structure designed by someone who just threw some prompts into an LLM and skimmed the results briefly before submitting to production?<p>Don’t rot your brain on this AI autocomplete stuff, learn how to apply AI to do things that were previously impossible or unfeasible, <i>not</i> as a way to just save time or do things cheaper as so many are tempted to.
noodletheworld3 个月前
Zero memory of chat conversations resonates to me.<p>At a practical level, this is a good reason to run your own AI plugin, even if it just a wrapper around some api.<p>You can log your requests and the responses, and then use a similarity score to periodically see what sorts of things you’re asking.<p>I may even update mine to hassle me and be like “you’re asking this a lot, maybe you should remember it…”<p>(If, you can be bothered, rather just reaching for copilot)
NooneAtAll33 个月前
For a reflection on the period &#x2F;without&#x2F; ai, this text spent a looot of time about time &#x2F;with&#x2F; ai<p>I understand that your goal was to review the &quot;default&quot; you got into, but I&#x27;d love to know a lot more about struggles (and counters to them) you experienced in the NAD itself
aicoding3 个月前
&quot;This site was made with some AI tools on November 27, 2024&quot;
评论 #42997810 未加载