TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

State Department might buy $400M worth of 'armored Teslas'

30 点作者 petethomas3 个月前

6 条评论

k3103 个月前
Emolument and conflict of interest are at insane and illegal levels.<p>See Anil Dash&#x27;s comments on Procurement Capture.[0]<p>&gt; Tycoons don&#x27;t like any game that&#x27;s not rigged in their favor. And right now, government spending at the federal level is mostly controlled by an agency called the General Services Administration, which oversees procurement. Is it complicated? Sure! Sometimes the complexity is for the same reasons that processes are inefficient around the office at your job, and that&#x27;s frustrating. But sometimes it&#x27;s good, because they&#x27;re trying to make sure nobody is buying $800 hammers. It&#x27;s not perfect, and it&#x27;s overly complex, but it is not totally captured by the richest guys in the world right now.<p>&gt; Now, imagine you were a tycoon who is also a defense contractor that is trying to sell hundreds of billions of dollars of military equipment to the government, and you know that the procurement process requires them to go with the lowest bidder. But, since you&#x27;re a dude with hundreds of billions of dollars, it doesn&#x27;t seem fair that the system isn&#x27;t even more rigged in your favor. How would you &quot;fix&quot; this system? Well, you&#x27;d have to capture procurement, so that it was rigged to only buy stuff from you and your friends, at whatever price you guys want. And if it could screw your competitors along the way, and punish them for not kissing your ass? That would be a bonus.<p>&gt; Enter DOGE. This isn&#x27;t new. &quot;Captured&quot; buying processes aren&#x27;t new, that kind of corruption has been common around the world for much of the last few centuries, though a lot of Americans may not be as familiar with it. The way it&#x27;s usually worked goes something like this: Want to succeed as a farmer? Well, you better buy your tractor from Fearless Leader&#x27;s best friend&#x27;s tractor company.<p>&gt; Or it could be more like this: Say you&#x27;re a government employee trying to figure out who to buy rockets from. Maybe it better be from the guy who runs the &quot;department&quot; that&#x27;s in charge of deciding where money gets spent in the government!<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.anildash.com&#x2F;&#x2F;2025&#x2F;01&#x2F;04&#x2F;DOGE-procurement-capture&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.anildash.com&#x2F;&#x2F;2025&#x2F;01&#x2F;04&#x2F;DOGE-procurement-captur...</a>
msie3 个月前
Let the fleecing commence.
gnabgib3 个月前
Previously (24 points, 6 hour ago, 1 comment) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43030761">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43030761</a>
hilux3 个月前
I called this one!<p>If only I were better at monetizing my predictions.
quantified3 个月前
That would be so woke of them to not be fueling with beautiful gasoline. So topsy-turvy.
aurareturn3 个月前
It&#x27;s not government waste as long as they are buying from Trump allies. Disgusting.