TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

NOAA: File is deleted by executive order [pdf]

60 点作者 paulgb3 个月前

7 条评论

noodlesUK3 个月前
To any who are interested, many other countries provide high quality weather data products (paid and free), and so does ECMWF at the European (not just EU) level. ECMWF’s data is available directly from them or via various member countries national agencies. My knowledge is Eurocentric but I suspect that China, Japan and others also have useful datasets.<p>I don’t work in the field, but I have visited ECMWF and they’re the real deal.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ecmwf.int&#x2F;en&#x2F;forecasts&#x2F;datasets&#x2F;open-data" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ecmwf.int&#x2F;en&#x2F;forecasts&#x2F;datasets&#x2F;open-data</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.met.no&#x2F;en&#x2F;free-meteorological-data&#x2F;Data-and-products-available-from-MET" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.met.no&#x2F;en&#x2F;free-meteorological-data&#x2F;Data-and-prod...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metoffice.gov.uk&#x2F;services&#x2F;data" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metoffice.gov.uk&#x2F;services&#x2F;data</a>
评论 #43073182 未加载
Grosvenor3 个月前
You should fully expect all NOAA data products to disappear. If only I had a few petabytes of spare storage.<p>Why should the government give that out to the paying public, when one of trumps friends could make a buck selling it to you?<p>The next obvious step is to dismantle NOAA altogether, because that could be provided by the private market.
评论 #43071915 未加载
评论 #43073727 未加载
Jimmc4143 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250108130906&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.noaa.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;2024-01&#x2F;NOAA_Radar_Next-Radar_Next_Program_242901.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250108130906&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.noaa....</a>
评论 #43072404 未加载
jfengel3 个月前
I just wish that it were possible to at least ask for empathy. I&#x27;d like to be able to say, &quot;Imagine Biden or Harris had done this. What would your reaction be?&quot;<p>It&#x27;s not really possible to get a meaningful answer to that question. Even if I accepted that an answer was honest I&#x27;m not sure I could accept it as accurate. Counterfactuals always have an element of &quot;all things being equal&quot; but things are never equal.<p>Still... You can see why I think they&#x27;d be calling for treason trials. And so I&#x27;m not sure what they expect me to be doing at this moment.
评论 #43072376 未加载
评论 #43072526 未加载
paulgb3 个月前
For context, the file is linked from here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.weather.gov&#x2F;news&#x2F;241908-weather-radars" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.weather.gov&#x2F;news&#x2F;241908-weather-radars</a>
strangattractor3 个月前
I see a private sector pay to have Weather service in our future.
oriettaxx3 个月前
it is here, too <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;commons.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;File:Radar_Next_Program_Overview.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;commons.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;File:Radar_Next_Program_O...</a><p>but I don&#x27;t get it: why was it removed?