TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Proposal: Add "No Screen Sharing" Flag for Secure Messaging Apps

2 点作者 JoelJacobson3 个月前
End-to-end encryption is pointless if you can be tricked into screen sharing. I’d like to see OS-level APIs let app developers set a &quot;no screen sharing&quot; flag that automatically blanks&#x2F;obscures the app&#x27;s contents during screen capture or remote control. This would be per-app and cannot be disabled by users—so secure messaging apps (e.g., Signal) could opt in, preventing accidental leaks via screen sharing.<p>Questions for HN:<p><pre><code> - What problems do you see with the approach? - Any better approaches?</code></pre>

2 条评论

elmerfud3 个月前
I strongly object to this idea that this is not under user control. Far too many companies and governments seek to control what their users do with data and information and devices that are supposed to be in the control of the user. If you don&#x27;t trust someone to handle secure information securely perhaps you shouldn&#x27;t be sending them secure information.<p>If you&#x27;re saying you want this to be an optional thing, perhaps even defaulted to enabled to protect grandma from doing something, then I would support that. But it needs to be optional. This mindset of a company can dictate every potential use case to end users is foolishness and doesn&#x27;t slow down hackers but just irritates normal users who need those features. Just like right now apps can flag whether you can do screenshots or not. In normal situations banking apps other secure messaging apps one time view of photo apps this is all quite useful but it shouldn&#x27;t be an enforced requirement that you have to then hack your phone to override it. It should be a default that&#x27;s enabled that you can then disable. Now if you want the sending party to know if you&#x27;ve disabled that feature that&#x27;s fine as well it&#x27;s simply more information. Then the sender can decide what they want to do. The idea of completely removing control as if you know better needs to stop.<p>Things will not get better with technology or literally anything if we cannot require people to be responsible for their actions. Sensible defaults are great a sensible default to have this on is fine a system that notifies other parties during a communication if it&#x27;s on or off is fine. Removal of control from the user is wrong.
评论 #43123442 未加载
aboardRat43 个月前
I don&#x27;t think it is appropriate (and feasible) to let app an developer decide how exactly and when _I_ share _MY_ screen on _MY_ phone.