TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Social media platforms are removing vital info on reproductive health

79 点作者 JeanMarcS3 个月前

8 条评论

AlexandrB3 个月前
I just want social media to end already. The centralization of internet content into the hands of 3-4 gatekeepers has been terrible for quality and independent thought.
评论 #43128814 未加载
评论 #43127922 未加载
评论 #43129350 未加载
评论 #43127508 未加载
rikafurude213 个月前
Its not "Abortion" itself being censored, rather gray market indian pharmaceutical companies. There is a huge market of third world pharma producers who create anything from modafinil to viagra and sell these prescription-only drugs on the open web. Their host countries do not prosecute, and the only reason the business works is that no country can check every single package that enters it. Anyone dedicated enough can find these marketplaces and order alot of useful medication, and in general i believe that drugs should be largely decriminalized and easily accessible, but that doesnt mean the potential customers themselves should be 'accessible' as well.
duxup3 个月前
The direct EFF url:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;pages&#x2F;stop-censoring-abortion" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;pages&#x2F;stop-censoring-abortion</a>
Meneth3 个月前
Putting any vital information on social media platforms was&#x2F;is a poor idea.
评论 #43126912 未加载
teddyh3 个月前
&gt; <i>over the past several years,</i><p>Not, say, in the past few months?<p>&gt; <i>there has been a sharp increase in reports of social media platforms removing or suppressing abortion-related content, even when no law requires platforms to do so</i><p>What platforms? What abortion-<i>related</i> content?
评论 #43127542 未加载
giantg23 个月前
Anything I see on social media requires a fact check on a &quot;legitimate&quot; site. I don&#x27;t even trust the random historical facts that pop up which are inconsequential. It&#x27;s a sad state that anyone is actually using important health information from these sources.
wsc9813 个月前
I find the phrase “reproductive health” a terrible euphemism.<p>Truth be told, the linked Bluesky post is direct in wording.
评论 #43127893 未加载
hiddencost3 个月前
Weird brigading in here
评论 #43127560 未加载