TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Aphyr: Comments on Executive Order 14168

3 点作者 ZeroCool2u3 个月前

1 comment

callc3 个月前
&gt; All this is to say that if people fill out these forms using this definition of sex, they’re guessing at a question which is both impossible to answer and socially irrelevant.<p>I agree with the article’s broad points. Don’t be the asshole trying to force other people into a gender&#x2F;sex box. The “socially irrelevant” part is wrong though. All societies I’m aware of, and especially the societies republicans want, have very particular roles and expectations for men and women. Just stating the facts; I wouldn’t mind having sex play a much smaller role.<p>While I’m on the side of the author philosophically, they have the wrong approach. You can’t use logic to convince a crazy person they are crazy. You can’t convince a narcissist of the harm they are spreading and get them to change.<p>I learned this the hard way. I think the best option for us to to fight like hell in the courts and through our representatives.
评论 #43135571 未加载