TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hundreds in US climate agency fired in latest cuts

42 点作者 tartoran2 个月前

6 条评论

inverted_flag2 个月前
&gt; &quot;I was fired from my dream of working at NOAA. I&#x27;m so sorry to everyone also affected,&quot; climate scientist Zack Labe wrote on X. He said that he had worked on strengthening the agency&#x27;s machine learning and AI tools.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xcancel.com&#x2F;ZLabe&#x2F;status&#x2F;1895244032923836498#m" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xcancel.com&#x2F;ZLabe&#x2F;status&#x2F;1895244032923836498#m</a><p>Note the replies<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bsky.app&#x2F;profile&#x2F;zacklabe.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;3ljapdyp7os2u" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bsky.app&#x2F;profile&#x2F;zacklabe.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;3ljapdyp7os2u</a>
评论 #43215547 未加载
评论 #43208625 未加载
JKCalhoun2 个月前
&gt; Huffman lamented the loss of &quot;hundreds of scientists and experts at NOAA&quot; who helped collect data that kept the public informed about dangerous weather events.<p>Perhaps I should learn to stop worrying and love this anti-science (anti-intellectual?) zeitgeist we find ourselves in.<p>(Bummer, seems divinginrods.com is taken, redirects to britishdowsers.org Gotta move fast, I guess.)
jmclnx2 个月前
&gt; &quot;We continue to provide weather information, forecasts and warnings pursuant to our public safety mission,&quot; the NOAA spokesman added.<p>&quot;except for anything related to Climate Change, there is no such thing as Climate Change per our all powerful co-dictators. Also, we hope to be closed down so we can be privatized, this way if you want forecasts you need to pay 20 USD per week to obtain them.&quot;<p>I think the spokesman left something out, so I added it here above. Best to know all the facts since Musk&#x2F;Trump likes to skip or lie about the important stuff.
评论 #43210425 未加载
jorblumesea2 个月前
move fast and break things, except now it&#x27;s storm warnings, weather prediction and climate forecasting. What could go wrong?<p>In a country of ~340M and a budget of trillions, what does this really save? Having a few hundred scientists on staff seems worth it. Pretty obvious DOGE is just a propaganda campaign and won&#x27;t accomplish any of its listed goals. It&#x27;s just hurting the American people.
评论 #43208946 未加载
评论 #43207538 未加载
评论 #43207653 未加载
croes2 个月前
&gt; The cuts come as Elon Musk, as the head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge)<p>Musk isn’t the head, Amy Gleason is.<p>Musk does not work for DOGE, nor are there any conflicts of interest between Musk&#x27;s company and DOGE&#x27;s activities.
评论 #43207539 未加载
评论 #43207468 未加载
评论 #43207504 未加载
foxglacier2 个月前
What I don&#x27;t understand about people complaining about governments removing programs and reducing their staff is that implies either the status quo is just right or it&#x27;s already not enough. Should they have hired 900 new workers too or just left it alone? Where were the complaints about previous governments not growing them fast enough? Will they accept any correction from an overshoot in finding the right amount?<p>Apparently NOAA grew rapidly in the previous few years [1], so was it underfunded by Obama?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;crsreports.congress.gov&#x2F;product&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;IF&#x2F;IF12406&#x2F;3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;crsreports.congress.gov&#x2F;product&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;IF&#x2F;IF12406&#x2F;3</a>
评论 #43207554 未加载
评论 #43207793 未加载
评论 #43207652 未加载
评论 #43209158 未加载
评论 #43207598 未加载
评论 #43208735 未加载
评论 #43207783 未加载
评论 #43207800 未加载