TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed"

211 点作者 SubiculumCode2 个月前

10 条评论

bryant2 个月前
Practically speaking, when the majority of people who decided to vote voted for the person applying these policies, what mitigations are left? The courts are themselves slow and ultimately roll up to allies of the despot.<p>People say that the midterms are crucial, but the midterms are only likely to be won if Democrats truly unify and apply winning strategies. Sadly the only winning strategies now seem to involve telling stories, not necessarily the truth.<p>And all of that essentially admits that the next two years are forfeit anyway.
评论 #43227326 未加载
评论 #43227618 未加载
评论 #43227356 未加载
评论 #43227331 未加载
评论 #43227311 未加载
评论 #43227470 未加载
评论 #43227315 未加载
评论 #43227371 未加载
评论 #43227420 未加载
评论 #43227292 未加载
评论 #43227308 未加载
评论 #43227352 未加载
评论 #43227524 未加载
评论 #43227548 未加载
评论 #43248935 未加载
评论 #43230970 未加载
评论 #43227525 未加载
评论 #43227467 未加载
评论 #43227332 未加载
评论 #43227409 未加载
评论 #43227314 未加载
评论 #43227446 未加载
评论 #43227398 未加载
评论 #43227442 未加载
评论 #43228201 未加载
评论 #43227434 未加载
评论 #43227334 未加载
评论 #43227321 未加载
评论 #43227324 未加载
LinuxBender2 个月前
<i>The NIH is being slashed and burned, not &quot;reformed&quot;</i><p>I know I will get beat up for this comment but someone has to say it. I believe this direction is well deserved. Clearly they were given far too much trust and were operating as a rogue organization for far too long. Developing bio-weapons and dual use medicines on college campuses and then moving them to China once called out by Obama is cavalier, aggressive, dangerous, wanton disregard for life and absolute folly. And that&#x27;s just what we know about. They can not take their own work seriously. To be clear I am not opposed to developing bio-weapons and dual use medicines rather I just want the people making these things to put a tremendous amount of safeguards friction and security around them. Move all the weapon development to highly secured military installations that are far away from everyone and require extensive scans before boarding a jet required to travel to that location and that is just to start their assignment. Once there they will have no privacy and will not leave until their work is completed and fully vetted.
spiderfarmer2 个月前
The country is gripped by a fever, with 47.9% of the population basking in the heat. These individuals are indifferent to anything that doesn’t directly impact them. In fact, they quietly relish others’ complaints, seeing them as a sign that they’re somehow gaining the upper hand.
评论 #43230293 未加载
评论 #43227438 未加载
评论 #43227475 未加载
sterlind2 个月前
PubMed is sporadically down, by the way, along with the rest of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nlm.nih.gov" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nlm.nih.gov</a>. I&#x27;m not sure if DOGE decided to pull the plug on it, or if there&#x27;s an outage. I wonder if there&#x27;s any SREs left to respond to the page.
DiscourseFan2 个月前
When some other state-power, perhaps the Chinese, starts sucking up American intellectual capital, then the US will collapse. So long as the US still offers the highest standard of living for high-wage workers, there won&#x27;t be any sort of collapse. Grants from the NIH will presumably move to the private sector. Is this a good thing? Perhaps not, but in the eyes of our new overlords the lifeblood of the economy is not public investment but in the collaborative spaces of creative minds working in diverse fields, as demonstrated, for them, by the productivity of big tech. And for individuals like Musk, this is limited by public institutions and can only be most fully explored via private investment.
评论 #43228083 未加载
评论 #43227709 未加载
评论 #43228008 未加载
评论 #43227941 未加载
SubiculumCode2 个月前
This is not just about new grants. NIH R01 grants are 5 years long. Each year however, the PI must submit a progress report, after which NIH signs off for another year of funding. That isn&#x27;t happening.<p>Labs which had years of funding lined up are suddenly contemplating layoffs, ending research midway.<p>It is devastating, stupid, and frankly, I am beyond angry. And I am also seeing the possibility that everything I&#x27;ve worked so hard to achieve over the last 20 years go to pieces.<p>We will have no king here, and we need to start remembering that fast.
评论 #43227362 未加载
lostmsu2 个月前
Can somebody help me understand: say I have a research grant and my cap on how much university can take for its operations is 15%. Does it mean that from my 85% I can not buy&#x2F;rent necessary equipment&#x2F;facilities previously provided by university anymore?
评论 #43227805 未加载
评论 #43229389 未加载
评论 #43233396 未加载
rqtwteye2 个月前
I work at a medical device company and I have heard that the people at the FDA we used to deal with are gone. the whole department. This is just nuts. I am totally in support of looking into efficiencies but the way they are going about it is totally destructive. Trump will be most impactful president in a long time. Domestically and internationally. They are tearing down everything we relied on for decades.
评论 #43227603 未加载
a-dub2 个月前
if they were honestly trying to improve things, the cuts would be phased in over a few funding cycles at a minimum.<p>it&#x27;s hard to see surprise cuts as anything more than willful vandalism and a gift to global competitors.<p>time to donate time and money to their opposition. one month in and they&#x27;ve already proven themselves a failure.
评论 #43233327 未加载
评论 #43227440 未加载
jmyeet2 个月前
There&#x27;s a lot that can be said about this like how we got here, what&#x27;s really going on and what we do about it but honestly, it&#x27;s all pretty pointless. Nothing is going to change.<p>We had 60 years of near-total Democratic control of Congress until, in the 1990s, the Democrats abandoned New Deal policies in favor of neoliberalism. Even this was a culmination of what began decades earlier, specifically that real wages stagnated and the wealth and income gaps grew starting around 1971 [1].<p>On the other side we have the Republican Project, a 50+ year effort to take over the government and reshape America as a Christian theocracy. Why? White supremacy, never getting over the end of chattel slavery, manifest destiny, all that. And it all started with the end of segregation and the effort to fight that using the issue of abortion as a weapon.<p>We have a Supreme Court that will go down in history as with the likes of Dred Scott. Citizens United, Dobbs, the historical tradition test, major questions doctrine and of course completely inventing presidential immunity out of thin air. But it&#x27;s not just them. It&#x27;s every layer of the courts thanks to pushing &quot;originalist&quot; propaganda (which was invented in the 1980s). Certain judges completely slow-walked prosecutions to benefit Trump directly. And brazenly.<p>Thanks to the takeover of states in 2010 in particular, districts are gerrymandered to hell to the point where, for example, Republicans managed a supermajority in Wisconsin despite getting 38% of the vote.<p>But what makes this fatal is there is absolutely no opposition to any of it. The Democratic Party are complicit in all of it. They are controlled opposition. They are more concerned with lining up their post-political lobbying and consulting careers than effecting any real change or opposition. In fact, the biggest threat to the Democratic Party isn&#x27;t fascism, it&#x27;s progressives. If the DNC opposed Trump half as well as they opposed Bernie Sanders, we&#x27;d be living in a very different world.<p>In the last election, Kamala Harris offered absolutely nothing to voters. Every policy was vetted by her brother to make sure Wall Street approved. Kamala Harris would rather lose an election to Trump tha adopt any progressive policies, desppite progressive policies doing incredibly well in ballot iniatives (eg minimum wage increase passed in Missouri, a deep red state).<p>The Democratic establishment will tell you progressive ideas aren&#x27;t popular despite electroal evidence to the contrary, namely Obama&#x27;s 2008 campaign, which was an electoral blowout. Sadly, Obama quickly abandoned any such policies.<p>None of what is happening now is intended to make anything more efficient. It&#x27;s just destruction of the state that regulates and occasionaally holds billionaires accountable. Food, drugs, health, housing, education... everything is going to get worse. And it&#x27;s nothing to do with the deficit either. The budget blueprint has $2 trillion in cuts and (drum roll please) $4.5 trillion in tax cuts.<p>These people and the voters idolize (even fetishize) a very narrow window in history: the 1950s. Yet they never look at the policies that were in effect at that time, specifically much higher taxes. Plus, all these middle class families had underpaid help thanks to segregation and other forms of institutionalized racism.<p>And on the foreign policy front, the administration is destroying the instruments of its own soft power (eg USAID). They keep telling us &quot;China is the enemy&quot; while creating a massive power vacuum China will happily fill.<p>At least in China you have better infrastructure, public transit, high speed rail, affordable health care and better access to education.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wtfhappenedin1971.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wtfhappenedin1971.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #43242594 未加载