TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Dozens of U.S. academics lose grants from Minerva Research Initiative

96 点作者 _tk_2 个月前

12 条评论

throwaway892012 个月前
Some poignant projects that were canceled after already been awarded:<p>&quot;What Sustains and Ends Wars: Will to Fight to Secure Ontological Significance Versus Material Capacity to Pursue Power&quot;, with a slide-reading lecture video on &quot;seemingly intractable conflicts&quot; [1].<p>&quot;Military Adaptation and War Termination&quot; [2]<p>&quot;&quot;Un&quot;Resilience: Drawing Insights from Societal Collapse&quot; [3]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=2i_EEHK_u6o" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=2i_EEHK_u6o</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;minerva.defense.gov&#x2F;Research&#x2F;Funded-Projects&#x2F;Article&#x2F;3965018&#x2F;military-adaptation-and-war-termination&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;minerva.defense.gov&#x2F;Research&#x2F;Funded-Projects&#x2F;Article...</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;minerva.defense.gov&#x2F;Research&#x2F;Funded-Projects&#x2F;Article&#x2F;3965117&#x2F;unresilience-drawing-insights-from-societal-collapse&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;minerva.defense.gov&#x2F;Research&#x2F;Funded-Projects&#x2F;Article...</a>
评论 #43237499 未加载
ironman14782 个月前
A lot of the research seems really useful. I don&#x27;t understand why we wouldn&#x27;t prioritize understanding how to prevent drug cartel recruitment (one of the examples cited in the article).
评论 #43236848 未加载
评论 #43236027 未加载
评论 #43235768 未加载
huijzer2 个月前
&gt; Other canceled projects investigated whether climate change could lead to armed conflicts over access to fish stocks and how it affects societies in the Sahel.
评论 #43235813 未加载
guelo2 个月前
These people think they found a loophole in the constitution where the president can steal congress&#x27;s power of the purse. I think that trying to find and exploit loopholes in the constitution breaks the spirit of the document and is traitorous to our form of government. But they don&#x27;t care for our form of government, they want to undermine it because without government it increases billionaire&#x27;s &quot;freedom&quot;.
评论 #43235771 未加载
评论 #43235664 未加载
评论 #43235608 未加载
评论 #43235607 未加载
评论 #43235728 未加载
slater2 个月前
Why is every recent thread on DOGE and DOGE-similar stuff <i>always</i> riddled with people asking &quot;this team were supposedly researching [insert apparently useless research topic], how does that help us?!?&quot;, as if every god damn research project funded by the US govt. better result in some kind of Manhattan-Project-style leap forward.
yowmamasita2 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;4luZu" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;4luZu</a>
gwerbret2 个月前
It&#x27;s interesting to see that as of the time I&#x27;m writing this, half the top-level comments in this thread are being downvoted.<p>I am NOT writing in support of the current slash-and-burn approach to government, but I suspect that the downvoted half are addressing a significant deficiency in this article -- it doesn&#x27;t mention what has been meaningfully accomplished by the Minerva Initiative in 17 years, given that the program had a fairly discrete set of objectives. Did they prevent any terrorist attacks? Did they forestall any destabilizing uprisings in significant countries? Did they develop a real and actionable understanding of radicalization or similar movements?<p>This is not to say that those accomplishments don&#x27;t exist (I wouldn&#x27;t know, I&#x27;d never heard of the program before), but it&#x27;s extraordinarily lazy writing by a supposedly-premier science publication for these not to be identified and highlighted, if they exist.<p>Edit: clarity.
评论 #43236330 未加载
huijzer2 个月前
&gt; Dozens of researchers with grants under the Minerva Research Initiative—studying violent extremism, disinformation, and threats from climate change, for example—have had their grants terminated in recent days.<p>Social scientists researching climate change.<p>With the discussion here on HN often about how misaligned the incentives are and with the replication crisis in mind I get it that funding was cut (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Replication_crisis" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Replication_crisis</a>).
评论 #43235727 未加载
评论 #43235637 未加载
评论 #43236774 未加载
评论 #43235686 未加载
评论 #43236460 未加载
评论 #43235657 未加载
holyknight2 个月前
Soo.. any of these had any real applications by the Pentagon? Or then why is the Pentagon using their budget to fund general research? It could be perfectly valid research, but that&#x27;s not their job.
评论 #43290574 未加载
评论 #43238136 未加载
fithisux2 个月前
&quot;for unclassified research&quot;<p>with public funds?
评论 #43235509 未加载
评论 #43235512 未加载
评论 #43235699 未加载
评论 #43235892 未加载
loxodrome2 个月前
Something tells me wheel survive with a smaller budget for social science studies.
评论 #43235750 未加载
lazyeye2 个月前
36.5 trillion in total national debt<p>Increasing by 1 trillion every 100 days<p>Thats by 10 billion per day<p>Thats 417 million per hour<p>Thats 6.9 million per minute<p>They need to cut more of this kind of stuff, not less.<p>Way more.
评论 #43235661 未加载
评论 #43239869 未加载
评论 #43235705 未加载
评论 #43235716 未加载