TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Return of Digg, a Star of an Earlier Internet Era

189 点作者 frankacter2 个月前

28 条评论

Loughla2 个月前
Digg killed itself and let reddit eat its lunch with user hostile practices. Just like slashdot before digg.<p>I find it fascinating that tech has gotten to a point where user hostile moves don&#x27;t have as much of an impact anymore. Reddit pushing new Reddit layout and killing 3rd party apps is what did it for me. But it seems like nobody really cares.<p>I don&#x27;t know what it means, but it means something.
评论 #43266694 未加载
评论 #43268160 未加载
评论 #43266004 未加载
评论 #43267597 未加载
评论 #43265987 未加载
评论 #43267330 未加载
评论 #43270859 未加载
评论 #43268318 未加载
评论 #43267819 未加载
评论 #43270947 未加载
评论 #43266688 未加载
评论 #43266386 未加载
评论 #43267823 未加载
评论 #43266304 未加载
评论 #43268779 未加载
评论 #43269752 未加载
评论 #43269035 未加载
评论 #43270345 未加载
评论 #43277879 未加载
评论 #43266131 未加载
评论 #43271186 未加载
评论 #43267653 未加载
评论 #43268581 未加载
评论 #43270003 未加载
评论 #43266099 未加载
评论 #43265941 未加载
评论 #43268374 未加载
评论 #43269032 未加载
angry_moose2 个月前
Oh damnit. I actually like current Digg. Doesn&#x27;t nearly have the reach it used to, but its definitely in my &quot;scan once a day list&quot; for a couple interesting articles.<p>&gt; Digg founder Kevin Rose has teamed up with former rival Alexis Ohanian to buy the once-popular content aggregator as they bet on an artificial intelligence-powered revival of the platform that once drew around 40 million monthly visitors.<p>Sounds way worse.<p>Edit: And, &quot;Current Digg&quot; is apparently down now.
评论 #43267273 未加载
peter4222 个月前
It is very funny that the article highlights these two guys saving Digg, and they both care so deeply about it that they are going to... sit on the board and keep their day jobs.<p>They won&#x27;t go all-in on the idea and expect that we&#x27;ll all be super excited by it. Just shows how out of touch VCs can get.
评论 #43268811 未加载
bityard2 个月前
Back in the day, my top three websites I would visit were: 1) Slashdot 2) Digg 3) Reddit<p>At the time, Reddit was extremely small and looked a lot like Hacker News does now, except that the content was about 1&#x2F;3 nerd-related, 1&#x2F;3 mainstream news, and 1&#x2F;3 was people&#x27;s experiences and questions about recreational drugs. (Which I was not and am not into.) I&#x27;m not sure if there were even subreddits at that point.
评论 #43271258 未加载
danso2 个月前
Dang I thought this was going to be a throwback (2013) article about Digg&#x27;s post-v4 relaunch [0] by Betaworks.<p>&gt; <i>The new Digg has little in common with the old site: it has big photos instead of tiny text, does not allow for comments, and most importantly, it depends on human editors in addition to an algorithm that weighs user voting. So far, people seem to like it. A new survey, this time with 2,600 users, showed that 81 percent would recommend the new Digg to a friend.</i><p>One thing I remember about this phase was how good the headlines were, they must have paid a decent sum for human editors.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;2&#x2F;4&#x2F;3950596&#x2F;diggs-traffic-rebounds-after-relaunch-but-users-remain-on-the" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;2&#x2F;4&#x2F;3950596&#x2F;diggs-traffic-rebo...</a>
评论 #43267143 未加载
TomMasz2 个月前
The Digg of (literally) yesterday was not the Digg that shot itself in the foot. It was just a site that posted links to various things you could find in other places. Not sure what they&#x27;re planning but I can&#x27;t help feeling the ol&#x27; ship has sailed on Digg as any kind of community site.
评论 #43266400 未加载
Stevvo2 个月前
I missed Diggnation, it was the first podcast I listed to. Happy to find it has already been revived; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.diggnation.show&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.diggnation.show&#x2F;</a>
评论 #43267606 未加载
flkiwi2 个月前
Given Kevin Rose&#x27;s web3 turn, I don&#x27;t have high hopes.
评论 #43266225 未加载
评论 #43268520 未加载
评论 #43271380 未加载
RobotToaster2 个月前
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0<p>Anyone else remember?
评论 #43270375 未加载
评论 #43270419 未加载
cyberlurker2 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;2025.03.05-123859&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;03&#x2F;05&#x2F;technology&#x2F;digg-alexis-ohanian-kevin-rose.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;2025.03.05-123859&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com...</a>
jaredcwhite2 个月前
Cue &quot;It&#x27;s a Trap!&quot; meme.<p>The future of online content sharing and discussion is decentralized, open source, and based on free protocols. We absolutely don&#x27;t need another Reddit riding off of past Digg vibes. We need a fast ejection out of corporate silos and proprietary platforms!
picafrost2 个月前
As one platform chases profits and loses its soul, another resurrects to welcome the nostalgic refugees. The eternal cycle of digital migration continues.
评论 #43269701 未加载
indigodaddy2 个月前
Ahh the nostalgia: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;W1_YoG7lqI4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;W1_YoG7lqI4</a>
评论 #43269927 未加载
评论 #43269940 未加载
评论 #43269696 未加载
superultra2 个月前
I&#x27;m a user of the original Digg (and many of its iterations, including plastic.com).<p>This whole approach seems tone deaf:<p>&gt; A.I. will also play a larger part in making Digg more accessible to users, Mr. Rose said. For instance, he said, a community of science-fiction enthusiasts could have their discussions translated into Klingon, the language used by the “Star Trek” alien race of the same name. A.I. tools can also help reduce spam, misinformation and harassment, he said.&quot;<p>Like nearly everything these days, this sounds like they raised money based almost solely on the premise that &quot;AI will fix everything.&quot; They don&#x27;t seem to understand that humans doing things is what makes all of this interesting to humans. I remember a BBS door that translated english to klingon. It was cool then because someone built it, but the fun was always doing it ourselves.<p>And is there any precedent for AI moderation at scale? It&#x27;s another example of a LLM wrapper with no moat.<p>Finally, the attention to moderators seems like a swing at Reddit. But are there people dumb enough to fall for that trick again (don&#x27;t answer that lol)?<p>At some point we need to realize that these VC driven &quot;ideas&quot; are all just content honeypots for AI training and do our own thing.
评论 #43267660 未加载
DustinBrett2 个月前
We need it, Reddit has become terrible.
评论 #43269809 未加载
评论 #43270428 未加载
评论 #43275292 未加载
ChrisArchitect2 个月前
It&#x27;s funny because Reddit basically owes Digg everything.<p>The history is often overlooked: when digg fumbled&#x2F;shot itself in the foot, Reddit was in the right-place-at-the-right-time and got lucky by the mass exodus looking for somewhere to go. Reddit itself was failing fast and on its last legs at the time held afloat by its core users and that&#x27;s it. They didn&#x27;t know what they were going to do and rather than being visionaries in any way really they got lucky hosting everyone with a slew of very standard web 2.0 features. It is&#x2F;was nothing special. It has been riding the wave ever since (and also why I see no reason to give people like Alexis Ohanian any praise or credibility when he&#x27;s out there talking about all kinds of nonsense, but I digress). And as with any social site, it&#x27;s the userbase&#x2F;community that pulls it thru darkness to the where it is now.
评论 #43270044 未加载
评论 #43268042 未加载
ojbyrne2 个月前
Just to be clear, digg started uncapitalized. I still miss the small d. It was more humble.
returnInfinity2 个月前
Reddit is worth 27 billion right now. What could have been.
评论 #43265978 未加载
评论 #43265882 未加载
dusted2 个月前
Anyone remember fazed.org (slogan: until the weekend heals us) ? Absolutely loved that site, in a way, it was similar to hn in design and &quot;random interesting stuff&quot; type of content.. For me, what killed it was the now long dead &quot;stumple upon&quot; (well, maybe not dead, but they did something years ago to make it suck more)
Brajeshwar2 个月前
I was there Gandalf, I was there 3,000 years ago.<p>Gotta Digg. “Did you hear that awful sound. Oh! Another Server’s Down.”
HumblyTossed2 个月前
They&#x27;ll never get back what it once was. Things are different now. Rose is ... different also.
lmm2 个月前
So are they going to avoid the negative changes that Reddit made? Since they&#x27;re saying the new Digg is going to be explicitly aimed at mobile users, sounds like no?
评论 #43291047 未加载
xhkkffbf2 个月前
Metacomment: There are 100 comments here. Only 2 on the NY Times. That&#x27;s a huge difference.<p>Of course only paid subscribers can comment. Maybe that&#x27;s the root of difference.
roger_2 个月前
I really hope they:<p>1) have a solution for spam (both blatant and subtle)<p>2) actively support their moderators<p>3) have well thought out and consistently enforced policies.<p>Reddit lost all of my goodwill years ago because of this.
评论 #43268008 未加载
评论 #43266621 未加载
scottrogers862 个月前
Had a feeling something was brewing here with the relaunch of Diggnation. Welcome back!
drooopy2 个月前
I just realized that Diggnation is also back.
whoomp123422 个月前
its a trap!!!!!!
thomassmith652 个月前
They need AI to ensure <i>only</i> MrBabyMan&#x27;s posts reach the front page. Human curation wasn&#x27;t 100% effective.