TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Compared to index funds, actively managed mutual funds still stink

46 点作者 MilnerRoute2 个月前

7 条评论

geor9e2 个月前
It always baffles me when my highly paid engineering coworkers refuse to manage their own investment portfolios and insist that a professional needs to do it. All you have to do is buy a Vanguard index fund ETF at Interactive Brokers or something similar. They have such agency and competence in everything else, but think finances are unknowable. Even just a 0.5% fee adds up to a huge percentage of your net worth gone after a few decades.
评论 #43306328 未加载
评论 #43306386 未加载
评论 #43306311 未加载
评论 #43307634 未加载
jandrewrogers2 个月前
It is hard to not notice that most of the actively managed funds that consistently do well are almost if not entirely their own customers exclusively. Management fees and performance hit differently in these cases.<p>It should be a lesson about incentives as much performance.
UltraSane2 个月前
If you let someone invest money for you they should have a fiduciary duty to you. Otherwise they are just trying to take your money via fees.
mattgreenrocks2 个月前
Fidelity’s been nagging me to come in and talk with them recently to make sure my index fund portfolio is “performing well.” Am I correct in guessing this discussion likely doesn’t have my best interests at heart?
评论 #43306256 未加载
评论 #43306034 未加载
评论 #43306033 未加载
评论 #43306049 未加载
评论 #43306238 未加载
timonoko2 个月前
Index funds are the worst. Everytime they hit the motherload, they have to sell it early on, so that the portfolio stays &quot;balanced&quot;.<p>You cannot have a fund that has 95% Nvidia, it is (probably) against the law.
评论 #43308462 未加载
评论 #43312564 未加载
AnotherGoodName2 个月前
Mutual funds have a lot of risk aversion, they even keep some of your money in cash. This poor performance shines through in the up years since the risk aversion wasn&#x27;t needed in hindsight. They&#x27;ll do better than index funds in down years but we haven&#x27;t had one of those in a while now.<p>That&#x27;s ultimately all this is. The fees are similar really but if one puts something like 50% in stocks, 30% in bonds, 10% overseas and 10% in cash while the other puts 100% in stocks the stocks will win if stocks alone were the best investment. That has been true since 2008 but may not always be true.
JKCalhoun2 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;Ceo5u" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;Ceo5u</a>