TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

I quit my FAANG job because it'll be automated by the end of the year (2025)

26 点作者 threevox3 个月前

14 条评论

swatcoder3 个月前
About four years of total industry experience, split across two very different work domains, in what sounds like one organization.<p>I can&#x27;t make an honest guess about whether their actual job will be &quot;automated&quot; or otherwise made redundant in the next year, as they suggest. Maybe they&#x27;re right that they&#x27;ve been doing easily automatable work for these few years.<p>But I <i>can</i> question whether they have nearly enough insight, exposure, or experience for their personal anxiety to speak to the future of industry at large, to the future of FAANG&#x27;s in general, or even to the future of their own &quot;FAANGco&quot;<p>I hope them the best in their personal decisions, but I wonder if they&#x27;re getting a little over their skis here.
评论 #43324905 未加载
neilv3 个月前
The closing:<p>&gt; <i>So the next step in my career is going to be talking to people about great AI products that are being built and helping them figure out if they&#x27;d find these products useful. If you&#x27;re building a great product and would like somebody to tell people about it, please don&#x27;t hesitate to reach out!</i><p>So, the blog post up to that point, about how AI will wipe out jobs, <i>could</i> be an audition for selling AI products to businesses.
评论 #43324550 未加载
tzahn3 个月前
The author is hyping up AI, including making people redundant, only to reveal at the end that he is going into AI sales.<p>Olympic level acrobatics.
honorious3 个月前
Am I the only one that thinks that being &quot;agent wrangler&quot; actually makes building things more fun?<p>To me, the interesting parts in building is taking a real problem, mapping it to a set of &quot;things&quot; that need to be built, decompose them into treatable chunks, and defining how they should interact. This is where intelligence comes in. if agents want to take the rest, please do! I can focus on making better products.
评论 #43324474 未加载
评论 #43324647 未加载
评论 #43324650 未加载
评论 #43324511 未加载
评论 #43324545 未加载
cadamsdotcom3 个月前
Oh no. This author appears to have imagined some kool aid to drink.<p>No one&#x27;s job is actively going away. What&#x27;s happening is job-role compression - no longer are there &quot;pure coder&quot; roles. You can think of it the same way as there&#x27;s no longer an IT team in the depths of the company - nowadays the company has many SaaS products strung together with APIs, and the office manager is part-time IT as one of their many roles. They do point-and-click to perform onboarding&#x2F;offboarding etc. - in the same morning they might onboard a new employee, then go restock the kitchen.<p>In software the roughly-equivalent outcome is a decrease in deeply technical work (and especially a decrease to produce CRUD apps). But no change in the human-to-human work to uncover what actually needs to be built. So you&#x27;re no longer a &quot;programmer&quot; or even &quot;software engineer&quot;, you&#x27;re now a &quot;full stack product manager&quot;.<p>It&#x27;s a continuation of a trend where less &quot;sit-and-type&quot; is needed to get to value. Think of how simple kubernetes and similar infra makes it to implement horizontally scalable, stateless web apps. As the &quot;sit-and-type&quot; ratio changes, the value you can generate by being good at deciding <i>what</i> to build increases!<p>As always, if you want a durable job, hone 2 skillsets: get good at talking to people about what they need, while simultaneously keeping up with trends such as LLMs so you can keep on guiding the computer to produce what is needed.
martinsnow3 个月前
Seems like jasper didn&#x27;t contribute much
G4BB3R3 个月前
Someone had to be fired to convince investors they are really replacing developers with &quot;AI&quot;.
ein0p3 个月前
Narrator: that is not why Jasper really quit Apple. Especially at Apple, no one will automate his job &quot;by the end of the year&quot;, or in the foreseeable future.
评论 #43324932 未加载
评论 #43326271 未加载
jdale273 个月前
Why is this flagged? Seems like a reasonable take and not obviously spammy to me. Maybe overly optimistic about AI progress, but that’s debatable.
评论 #43332133 未加载
gorbachev2 个月前
This is the year for Linux in the desktop^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hwhen AI replaces you.
IamLoading2 个月前
why quit your job, when you can maximize whatever money is given to you.
alchemyzach3 个月前
youtube clickbait ass title. &quot;quit my FAANG job because of ai&quot; no you didnt dog
评论 #43324635 未加载
tehjoker3 个月前
Another one falling for a modern Pascal&#x27;s wager and making poor decisions or simply posting something that sounds cool to cover a big L.
评论 #43324502 未加载
draw_down3 个月前
When I started my career 20 years ago, I thought &quot;they&quot; would figure out how to get a computer to do my job pretty soon. Coders are expensive after all. And I figured I&#x27;d just go walk into the woods or something after that; I had no plan for what to do. This is the only thing I&#x27;m good at and can make money doing.<p>Well, it&#x27;s been 20 years and it hasn&#x27;t happened yet. Perhaps this will be the year! But not yet.