TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Threaded vs. Flat Discussion

2 点作者 magackame2 个月前
I thought about implementing a simple HN-like forum with the assumption of a single instance being like a subreddit (like r&#x2F;emacs is just about emacs, no categories), but I am having a headache deciding between threaded vs flat.<p>Do you think one is inherently superior, depends on type of forum (discussion&#x2F;support&#x2F;development&#x2F;etc) or there should be a UI toggle?

2 条评论

Tomte2 个月前
Toggle won&#x27;t work, because people will see different variants of the discussion and reference it (&quot;the sibling comment&quot;, &quot;two above&quot;).<p>I was net-socialized in Usenet, strongly believe that threaded is much superior, but would choose flat every time for a project today.
评论 #43363442 未加载
toomuchtodo2 个月前
I have been thinking similarly to support threads on Bluesky&#x2F;AT protocol (to replace Reddit subs). I think threads have value on some discussion topics, but not all, and it is hard to know in advance which will be most useful before the discussion happens. Mods here are somewhat privileged in that HN supports threads, and they can move comments and subthreads around at will to shape the discourse.<p>TLDR Support threads, but enable flexibility when doing so (imho, ymmv, etc)