TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The curious surge of productivity in U.S. restaurants

160 点作者 ryan_j_naughton2 个月前

37 条评论

deathanatos2 个月前
&gt; <i>The restaurants’ productivity growth rates are strongly correlated, however, with reductions in the amount of time their customers spend in the establishments, particularly with a rising share of customers spending 10 minutes or less. The frequency of such ‘take-out’ customers rose considerably during COVID, even at fast food restaurants, and never went back down. The magnitude of the restaurant-level relationship between productivity and customer dwell time, if applied to the aggregate decrease in dwell time, can explain almost all of the aggregate productivity increase in our sample.</i><p>One restaurant near me ditched its dine-in service entirely during COVID. They never went back; the dining area is now some odd mix of storage&#x2F;prep&#x2F;work area, and they&#x27;re still take-out only.<p>Which is a bit sad; the dine-in area was a pretty cozy experience, and you&#x27;d get free tea with the meal. (It was a Japanese restaurant.)
评论 #43372783 未加载
评论 #43370278 未加载
评论 #43371945 未加载
评论 #43365722 未加载
评论 #43371187 未加载
评论 #43370067 未加载
评论 #43389384 未加载
评论 #43370092 未加载
评论 #43365599 未加载
评论 #43369331 未加载
wat100002 个月前
This seems really stupid.<p>A restaurant sells two basic categories of product: food&#x2F;drink, and service. Labor is expended on both.<p>They’re ignoring service and only looking at food&#x2F;drink. The split between these two products has shifted away from service. That means more labor is going into the thing they’re actually counting and less is going into the thing they’re ignoring. Wow, productivity went up!<p>It’s interesting that the industry has shifted to more takeout, but framing it as “surge of productivity” is ridiculous.
评论 #43374361 未加载
评论 #43373636 未加载
评论 #43372497 未加载
评论 #43374546 未加载
评论 #43374286 未加载
dataviz10002 个月前
Simple.<p>The overhead on takeout is far less than dine-in although the menu items cost the same. Dine-in costs include base waitstaff salary and workman&#x27;s comp, cleaning crew and dishwashers, electricity, insurance, ect.. while takeout requires the very small cost of packaging. Something that always bugs me is restaurants that charge $2 or $5 surcharge for takeout. I&#x27;m saving the restaurant a ton of money by not using the dining room, why would they discourage that?<p>&gt; It cannot be explained by economies of scale<p>I disagree. Increase in takeout is an increase in efficiency for each line cook and emnployee.<p>There was a 23 seat restaurant on the top of the hill in Pacific Grove, CA in the 90s named Taste Bisto. The chef and his wife made a fortune from that tiny restaurant. He did two things. First, he set the prices so there was always a little line waiting at the door, not too long, and he encouraged takeout with an emphasis on making the food still look presentable when the person opens the container 30 minutes later at home. According to the chef, his real profits came from the takeout. From the point of view of the grill cook, grilling 8 pork chops or 18 pork chops at. the same time isn&#x27;t much different, as the cook has to stand by the grill anyhow.
评论 #43371577 未加载
评论 #43372911 未加载
评论 #43372083 未加载
评论 #43371206 未加载
评论 #43371505 未加载
评论 #43374008 未加载
alwa2 个月前
How much of this is the COVID-correlated normalization of delivery apps [0]? Anecdotally I do sometimes notice people eating quickly or taking out, but what I <i>really</i> notice is the nonstop flurry of app delivery folks darting in and out of the pickup area... Seems consistent with the study&#x27;s observations, too:<p>&gt; <i>As a result, we think the growth in take-out or delivery is the primary driver of the jump in short visits. With take-out, the customer orders on their phone and then comes into the restaurant to pick it up without eating there. With delivery, the customer orders food to be delivered to their home either from a food app like Grubhub or directly from the restaurant itself as with a Domino’s Pizza. It is important to recognize that either of these things connotes a substitution of home production for restaurant labor. The customer cleans up after themselves and washes their own dishes, for example. And delivery services substitute for the customer traveling themselves. But they are still, from the restaurant’s perspective, just a new stream of demand. If the restaurant can satisfy such quick-turn customers in addition to their regular customers with the same labor force, that would show up in the data as a clear, legitimate increase in their productivity.</i><p>[0] cf. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessofapps.com&#x2F;data&#x2F;doordash-statistics&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessofapps.com&#x2F;data&#x2F;doordash-statistics&#x2F;</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessofapps.com&#x2F;data&#x2F;grubhub-statistics&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessofapps.com&#x2F;data&#x2F;grubhub-statistics&#x2F;</a>
评论 #43369275 未加载
rahimnathwani2 个月前
They looked only at fast food, buffet and snack&#x2F;cafe places:<p><pre><code> The Spend data covers major national brands disproportionately, making it much more representative for limited-service&#x2F;fast-food restaurants than full-service restaurants. We therefore restrict the sample to POIs reporting NAICS codes corresponding to limited-service eating places (NAICS 722513, 722514, and 722515) and associated with a brand for which there is non-missing visit and spend data. This encompasses three subcategories: limited-service restaurants (e.g., Taco Bell, McDonalds); cafeterias, grill buffets, and buffets (e.g., Hartz Chicken Buffet); and snack and nonalcoholic beverage bars (e.g., Starbucks). Our final sample contains over 100,000 unique restaurants from over 600 distinct brands. From January 2019 to December 2022, our sample captures a total of about $24 billion in nominal sales.</code></pre>
mihaic2 个月前
This is a strong argument that habits formed during covid stuck around until today, as it was long enough to reshape the baseline.<p>Unfortunately these habits seem to affect the sociability of everyone, and I think we still underestimate what a terrible burden staying locked in was on the population.
评论 #43378937 未加载
评论 #43365565 未加载
cs7022 个月前
Abstract: &quot;We document that, after remaining almost constant for almost 30 years, real labor productivity at U.S. restaurants surged over 15% during the COVID pandemic. This surge has persisted even as many conditions have returned to pre-pandemic levels. Using mobile phone data tracking visits and spending at more than 100,000 individual limited service restaurants across the country, we explore the potential sources of the surge. It cannot be explained by economies of scale, expanding market power, or a direct result of COVID-sourced demand fluctuations. The restaurants’ productivity growth rates are strongly correlated, however, with reductions in the amount of time their customers spend in the establishments, particularly with a rising share of customers spending 10 minutes or less. The frequency of such ‘take-out’ customers rose considerably during COVID, even at fast food restaurants, and never went back down. The magnitude of the restaurant-level relationship between productivity and customer dwell time, if applied to the aggregate decrease in dwell time, can explain almost all of the aggregate productivity increase in our sample.&quot;<p>Huh. Interesting!<p>The finding is consistent with both the changes, since the pandemic, in my own eating-out habits and the behavior of other customers I see at restaurants I visit regularly.<p>Nonetheless, seeing it validated with an analysis of largish-scale data is worth the read.<p>The question is whether eating-out habits have permanently changed, or whether they will eventually revert to pre-pandemic patterns.<p>Thank you for sharing this on HN!
评论 #43372076 未加载
评论 #43365504 未加载
xg152 个月前
I wonder if there are also cultural&#x2F;regulatory differences here.<p>I&#x27;m in the EU, and of course we had the forced shift to takeout as well, during covid. But while homeoffice as a concept stayed, restaurants very quickly went back to in-house dining when it was over.<p>Seeing a takeout-only restaurant with a repurposed dine-in area here in 2025 would be beyond weird and would probably just give everyone covid flashbacks.<p>Interesting to see that the specifics of what has stayed from the covid time and what has reverted could be different from country to country.
评论 #43370674 未加载
评论 #43370008 未加载
评论 #43369439 未加载
评论 #43375579 未加载
评论 #43369463 未加载
wormlord2 个月前
Friedmanite economists lauding the &quot;productivity increases&quot; of restaurants, meanwhile I have stopped eating anywhere except food trucks because mid-tier dining is so bad now due to cost-cutting and loss of expertise.<p>Yeah that tracks for Chicago School economics.
评论 #43365694 未加载
评论 #43365422 未加载
评论 #43381038 未加载
pcthrowaway2 个月前
People switched away from cash during COVID. Lots of people who might have been unbanked or lightly banked went all-in as everything went digital.<p>Now restaurants (historically a pretty cash-heavy industry) have fewer cash transactions.<p>Possibly related?
评论 #43370158 未加载
评论 #43376009 未加载
评论 #43369430 未加载
nortlov2 个月前
My take away is that the overall labor per customer decreases because workers are spending less time on non-cooking&#x2F;serving tasks. The paper implies the efficiency gain is in how labor is used rather than production or serving efficiency. This seems like an anticlimactic conclusion.
评论 #43365381 未加载
评论 #43365255 未加载
the-rc2 个月前
I would have guessed that the surge had something to do with faster payments, namely contactless and the wireless terminals. In a way, it&#x27;s even broader than that: if you order for pick up and prepay, payment is pretty much out of the picture entirely, replaced by just verifying that you are getting the right order. Then you&#x27;re avoiding the productivity losses in serving the dishes, washing the plates, etc.
评论 #43365533 未加载
kayo_202110302 个月前
I&#x27;m confused. The paper is about something called &quot;Restaurant Productivity&quot;, but it&#x27;s not defined up-front, or any place close to up-front. Maybe, it&#x27;s defined by page 9, but it&#x27;s hard to tell. It all might be completely correct, but for God&#x27;s sake write a paper that a reasonably intelligent person can follow. What are we talking about? What do we know? What you think we know, but isn&#x27;t true. What we now believe, having done the analysis. Quick summary, and then done. I think Goolsbee is famous somewhere, but why be a lead author on a badly written paper? It&#x27;s just prose. Maybe it&#x27;s true, but who&#x27;d know?
评论 #43375567 未加载
harrall2 个月前
People got out of their comfort zone during COVID and tried new things.<p>Campgrounds got packed, people got into skateboarding… if you look at statistics, you’ll see a 2020-ish bump for many interests and an associated sudden growth in revenue.<p>But the question is how long it will last…<p>Some outdoor brands that expanded with new stores post-pandemic discovered that many people who tried camping&#x2F;surfing&#x2F;etc. only had a fleeting interest and these brands had to close stores.<p>Tech companies that hired during the pandemic found out a lot of people who tried online meetings&#x2F;online work only did it because they had to and stopped as soon as they could and these companies had to lay off staff.<p>But maybe the people who “discovered delivery orders” during COVID won’t ever stop.
评论 #43369911 未加载
Animats2 个月前
<i>&quot;The restaurants’ productivity growth rates are strongly correlated, however, with reductions in the amount of time their customers spend in the establishments, particularly with a rising share of customers spending 10 minutes or less. The frequency of such ‘take-out’ customers rose considerably during COVID, even at fast food restaurants, and never went back down.&quot;</i><p>Well, duh.<p>I feel I&#x27;m in the way eating in a restaurant when 90% of their business is filling DoorDash&#x2F;Uber orders.<p>Restaurants are closing earlier. 8 PM closing isn&#x27;t unusual now. By then, the delivery business has dried up, and they want the onsite customers to clear out.<p>I previously mentioned a place in Silicon Valley near Apple HQ where not only did they want onsite customers to order via a QR-code menu, they tried to get customers to go through onboarding and set up an account. Eating onsite was simply a delivery with a very short distance, bag and all.<p>Of course &quot;productivity&quot; is up.
评论 #43369942 未加载
copypasterepeat2 个月前
I wonder if the surge in productivity would hold up if you also take into account the productivity of delivery people, who are with the move to delivery apps as much a part of the kitchen-to-table pipeline as the people working in the kitchens. I don&#x27;t have any data on what they typically make, but my very anecdotal evidence suggests it&#x27;s usually not much, especially when you take into account the gas, wear and tear on the car, etc.
评论 #43372311 未加载
jdeibele2 个月前
I&#x27;ve noticed at several Thai restaurants in the Portland area that we are the only or almost only customers in the restaurant. There&#x27;s a steady stream of Door Dash, Uber Eats, etc. drivers picking up orders.<p>I haven&#x27;t noticed it as much with other restaurants. Maybe Thai (and other Asian) dishes hold up well because the topping is typically kept separate from the rice?
评论 #43370136 未加载
评论 #43369411 未加载
krunck2 个月前
Eating in American restaurants where there is constant pressure to shovel in the food and leave, is a waste. You feel like you&#x27;re on an assembly line. What&#x27;s the point then? On top of that they have the gall to ask for 25% tips. For what? Pressuring me to leave?<p>I enjoy visiting Eastern Europe(and Europe in general) where a party can sit at a table at 7pm, dine, drink, talk, and relax and remain there until close at 1am if they want. No pressure. Just spending time with people and sharing food together. The table is yours for the evening. No pressure to tip at all yet I tip generously.<p>America&#x27;s got it all wrong.
评论 #43365588 未加载
评论 #43366968 未加载
评论 #43365746 未加载
评论 #43370152 未加载
评论 #43365561 未加载
chrisbrandow2 个月前
And every restauranteur I’ve spoken to uniformly describe the last few years as miserable
ForOldHack2 个月前
Coming from Chicago, famous for its Economics, this article, and its premise are mystifingly inadequate for even answering why their metrics are so poorly used and misunderstood. I would go through and point out most of the utter lack of understanding and rigor. Soon this article, and its lack of scholarship will sink gently into the muck. Here is something to cleanse the palette:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;12&#x2F;10&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;krugman-robots-and-robber-barons.html?hp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;12&#x2F;10&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;krugman-robots-an...</a>
keming2 个月前
My first thought upon seeing the headline was that perhaps this could be due to a workforce that has abandoned or has been abandoned by other industries- providing an influx of enthusiasm, competition, variety, and desperation.<p>But, then I read:<p>&gt; We document that, after remaining almost constant for almost 30 years, real labor productivity at U.S. restaurants surged over 15% during the COVID pandemic.<p>So I wonder if it’s a combination of workers getting better tips and more people buying takeout meals?
daft_pink2 个月前
So offended that Steak N Shake has order screens instead of servers these days and they still expect a similar tip before service is even rendered.
评论 #43373559 未加载
PeterStuer2 个月前
Would the numbers reflect the same if restaurants increased had their contingent of undocumented and thus undeclared workers?<p>For example: If I perviously had 1 server, then brought in a second one which is not on the books at all and I pay under the counter in cash, would it show up as a productivity increase of my still official single employee?
whatever12 个月前
How people can afford take out? Uber eats etc charge rates are insane like 20$ per order (don’t forget the driver tip). I also noticed they have a variable cost as well aka if you order food worth 100$ you pay more compared to if the food was 50$. Like this adds to the delivery cost.
TriangleEdge2 个月前
I get recruitment emails for a startup some people from Uber are making called Cloud Kitchens. Basically kitchens that can scale based on demand. The company provides ingredients and the kitchens make the food. Share resources make it more productive. I think restaurants themselves are unproductive.
评论 #43369398 未加载
jeffchien2 个月前
It&#x27;s a little frustrating to me that the paper breaks out major chains as the big contributing factors, but doesn&#x27;t analyze the remaining bucket. If possible I&#x27;d like to see the restaurants sliced by $&#x2F;visit to see the effects on mid- or high-end restaurants.
kittikitti2 个月前
I don&#x27;t have to deal with racist waiters by ordering through an app and having it delivered. This is a win-win where the restaurant is more &quot;productive&quot; and I don&#x27;t have to deal with the staff guessing my race so they know how badly to treat me.
评论 #43365821 未加载
Ozzie_osman2 个月前
QR code menus, and phone or tablet ordering, also took off. Surely that affects productivity as well.<p>Im guessing also, just doing things with thinner staff and resources overall caused a lot of establishments to learn how to operate more efficiently.
评论 #43372372 未加载
casey22 个月前
Restaurant dining rooms are a complete waste of valuable real estate. Everybody wanted to live like millionaires in the 50s without a thought for sustainability. Two hour drive into downtown to park your cat in a reserved spot and walk your wife and 2.5 children to their reserved seats, eat a 3 course meal with a waiter all for under 100 bucks including gas and tip.<p>It was never going to last. If you don&#x27;t use your resources efficiently from the very beginning your country is going to stagnant
评论 #43373335 未加载
Tesas2 个月前
They probably offer less complex dishes with simpler to cook ingredients.
spoonjim2 个月前
This uses the economists&#x27; definition of &quot;productivity&quot; creating a confusing headline.<p>In reality, &quot;productivity&quot; as a layperson would understand it hasn&#x27;t increased at all and the reason isn&#x27;t very &quot;curious.&quot; What&#x27;s happened (by the economists&#x27; own conclusion) is that more people are ordering take-out and fewer people are eating in the restaurant, causing the restaurant to make more money per unit of labor. This is a trend that is probably going to make things like social isolation etc. worse, so not really something to celebrate.
dismalaf2 个月前
It&#x27;s because a lot of &quot;family&quot; dining establishments went out of business and every type of &quot;fast&quot; establishment grew.<p>Over in say, Europe, the cost of commercial real estate is much lower (including more restaurants owning their own building) and governments simply covered lost revenue versus loans which enabled more full service restaurants to stay in business.<p>The fact is, full service restaurants are a horrible business model and most aren&#x27;t priced appropriately (they should be priced much higher).
csomar2 个月前
Productivity here is sales per employee. That&#x27;s why productivity has &quot;shot up&quot; during the pandemic. &quot;Productivity&quot; remained high because you can look page 20 where people no longer stay at the restaurant and just order food online or food to go.<p>tl;dr: restaurants are becoming shittier and people are just grabbing food. that makes it possible for the restaurant to maximize his sales&#x2F;head count. There is no real &quot;productivity&quot; gain here. You removed parts of the usual service, put more load on your employees and still charge high prices.
jacknews2 个月前
i&#x27;m not sure how this is anything to do with productivity<p>surely that&#x27;s when the same product or service is delivered more cheaply<p>the starting question must have been more like &#x27;why are restaurants more profitable now&#x27;<p>and it&#x27;s because restaurants are now selling more take-out meals; essentially a different product, which has lower overheads
评论 #43365352 未加载
littlestymaar2 个月前
TL;DR; “productivity” of restaurant in the colloquial sense hasn&#x27;t progressed, but restaurants have diversified their business to the growing market of delivery apps, which is less labor intensive, hence the boost in observed “productivity”.
erulabs2 个月前
My favorite ~75 year old BBQ place here in Pasadena has half the bar (where you&#x27;d sit and eat and socialize if you were eating alone) reserved to give space for all the take-out orders and uber-eats pickups flowing through. I see single people come in and, without a space at the bar, take a seat at a booth alone.<p>I don&#x27;t blame restaurants for this at all, it&#x27;s a tough business, but I do think it&#x27;s about time we apply just an ounce of shame to people who uber-eats every meal they eat from restaurants clearly designed for eating-in. Not to rant, but take out is for the pizza place, the Indian grocery store with no seating, the tiny hole-in-the-wall Chinese place, etc. If you order a southern fried chicken plate from a nice neighborhood restaurant for delivery, shame on you. Delivery sushi? Boo and hiss!
评论 #43365392 未加载
评论 #43365332 未加载
评论 #43373698 未加载
评论 #43365463 未加载
评论 #43365353 未加载
评论 #43365303 未加载
评论 #43365490 未加载
JackFr2 个月前
I&#x27;m not an academic economist, so what do I know, but I think the authors aare missing something else.<p>I think the productivity was in some part driven by minimum wage laws. At lower wages, developing, installing and maintaining ordering kiosks and smart phone ordering apps makes less sense, because fast food cashiers are so cheap. When fast food cashiers become more expensive (and the technology costs come down) kiosks and apps make more sense. The same amount of food sold without the cost of cashiers is the resultant increase in productivity.<p>So my theory in a nutshell was that cashiers added little value. Substituting capital for labor led to labor productivity gains.
评论 #43365993 未加载