TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

New York Times shut down Tor Onion service

251 点作者 vaygr2 个月前

16 条评论

yawnxyz2 个月前
&gt; deepened our understanding of reaching audiences that might otherwise be blocked from accessing our journalism &gt; Users who wish to continue reading Times journalism where their access to the main website may be blocked can do so through WhatsApp or Telegram.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;</a> is still the de-facto way to read NYT articles...
评论 #43368601 未加载
评论 #43369862 未加载
评论 #43368679 未加载
noident2 个月前
WhatsApp and Telegram are hardly replacements for Tor access. A government can block them easily.<p>The onion service&#x27;s days were numbered after they fired Runa Sandvik. I&#x27;m surprised it lasted this long. Looking at the pay and current labor disputes, it seems like the New York Times isn&#x27;t a good place for a skilled software engineer to work these days.<p>They&#x27;ll keep running SecureDrop over an onion service, right...?
评论 #43368559 未加载
评论 #43369780 未加载
评论 #43375978 未加载
评论 #43370281 未加载
sharkjacobs2 个月前
&gt; Users who wish to continue reading Times journalism where their access to the main website may be blocked can do so through WhatsApp or Telegram.<p>elsewhere,<p>&gt; Apple Says It Was Ordered to Pull WhatsApp From China App Store<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;04&#x2F;18&#x2F;technology&#x2F;apple-whatsapp-china-app-store.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;04&#x2F;18&#x2F;technology&#x2F;apple-whatsapp...</a>
评论 #43369319 未加载
评论 #43369101 未加载
luma2 个月前
Journalists speak truth to power, meanwhile the NYT aligns itself with power at every opportunity. For example, they knew the NSA was spying on us but never ran the story to protect GW&#x27;s chances at reelection. Presumably they didn&#x27;t want to be seen as anti-establishment with the new powers and are reverting to their time-proven behavior. NYT will lick the boot when presented, same as ever.
评论 #43368587 未加载
评论 #43368580 未加载
评论 #43369794 未加载
评论 #43368532 未加载
评论 #43369119 未加载
评论 #43369056 未加载
评论 #43368665 未加载
评论 #43370949 未加载
评论 #43368889 未加载
freen2 个月前
Chilling effects and all that.<p>Complying in advance with the expectation of attacks on first amendment rights only emboldens autocrats and smooths their path to total control.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lithub.com&#x2F;resist-authoritarianism-by-refusing-to-obey-in-advance&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lithub.com&#x2F;resist-authoritarianism-by-refusing-to-ob...</a>
lxgr2 个月前
Despite the symbolism, does this change anything about their reachability from Tor?<p>Is there any practical advantage to a website in being explicitly reachable as a hidden service on Tor, as opposed to simply not blocking exit node IPs?
评论 #43369188 未加载
评论 #43369828 未加载
beardog2 个月前
Reddit still has an onion service but is defacto unusable
评论 #43369725 未加载
DeathArrow2 个月前
If my life or my freedom would be at stake, I wouldn&#x27;t rely on TOR for anonymity.
评论 #43376176 未加载
评论 #43370571 未加载
aendruk2 个月前
They started serving an expired TLS certificate on 2024-12-08. I inquired about it a few days after but never heard back.
cantrecallmypwd2 个月前
Another act of bending the knee, just like when they axed Chris Hedges in the patriotic military invasions.
t0bia_s2 个月前
Would be interesting to see statistics of how many unique visits per day through onion on NYT was made.
tonymet2 个月前
related<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43246274">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43246274</a>
评论 #43368808 未加载
mlinksva2 个月前
&gt; we are now taking these learnings and applying them to building out our main page and signature products<p>I&#x27;d love (genuinely, this is not a snarky comment) to read more about either (learnings, application) or of course both.
notepad0x902 个月前
Isn&#x27;t it a paywalled service? How do people use it? they access it anonymously and then pay with a card?
评论 #43370835 未加载
lordofgibbons2 个月前
NYTimes lost any and all credibility when they hired a literal Israeli Military Intelligence propagandist to write the their headline shock inducing piece on 40 beheaded babies, infants in ovens, and mass rape.<p>These have all been widely been debunked, including by Israeli media. But NYT never retracted their propaganda piece. This gave a free hand for the IDF, with U.S backing, to commit mass murder on an industrial scale in Gaza.<p>How are they even relevant anymore, and why do people pay to consume literal foreign propaganda? The purpose of the news media is to inform, but these guys are doing the complete opposite.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;zei_squirrel&#x2F;status&#x2F;1761740292015767736" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;zei_squirrel&#x2F;status&#x2F;1761740292015767736</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theintercept.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;02&#x2F;28&#x2F;new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theintercept.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;02&#x2F;28&#x2F;new-york-times-anat-schw...</a>
评论 #43368822 未加载
评论 #43371726 未加载
评论 #43368905 未加载
entriesfull2 个月前
Good riddance. We The People will continue to build open and decentralized&#x2F;anonymous platforms that don&#x27;t spread government propaganda.
评论 #43369847 未加载