TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Extracting DNA from the air – DNA evidence of human occupancy in indoor premises

248 点作者 punnerud2 个月前

12 条评论

a_bonobo大约 2 个月前
This is a slightly older paper, note that air environmental DNA now has progressed a lot, especially for species mapping.<p>Here&#x27;s a cool recent paper showing you can extract DNA of local species from spider webs, by sequencing DNA stuck to spider webs from next to a zoo <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S2589004224001251" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S258900422...</a>
treetalker大约 2 个月前
From the abstract:<p>&gt; Detectable levels of DNA were also observed in air and dust samples from ultra-clean forensic laboratories which can potentially contaminate casework samples.<p>Great news for criminal defense attorneys.
评论 #43396805 未加载
评论 #43396637 未加载
评论 #43396186 未加载
dc396大约 2 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt0119177&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imdb.com&#x2F;title&#x2F;tt0119177&#x2F;</a> was conservative. Great movie though.
评论 #43396210 未加载
评论 #43414328 未加载
评论 #43396906 未加载
h1fra大约 2 个月前
I have always wondered why DNA is an accepted evidence. It&#x27;s so easy to contaminate a crime scene or bring someone else hair, skin cells, etc by mistake.
评论 #43397344 未加载
评论 #43398743 未加载
评论 #43398201 未加载
评论 #43408056 未加载
water-data-dude大约 2 个月前
Well, that’s going to make it harder to hide from the hunter-killer bots
steve_adams_86大约 2 个月前
At work we do this with DNA floating around in the ocean (have to track down all those nasty invasive crabs) but I wouldn’t have guessed we could do this with the air around us as well. That’s so cool.<p>Maybe we should spin up an air-based version for the office to keep track of who’s in coming to work the most
评论 #43396857 未加载
评论 #43404629 未加载
评论 #43396487 未加载
评论 #43396374 未加载
the__alchemist大约 2 个月前
This article... keeps repeating phrases about criminals, authorities, safe-houses, solving crimes. Feels off. I was expecting this to focus on the lab techniques, feasibility, technical details. It jumps straight from forensic application details to results without the in-between. I think the in-between is the interesting part.<p>It&#x27;s as if they took the token sentence that goes in an abstract about potential applications, and turned it into the meat of the article.<p>It sounds like they are using standard extraction kits, them analyzing with RT-PCR.
jp57大约 2 个月前
Makes me wonder if dogs can smell your DNA.
rgrieselhuber大约 2 个月前
So, DNA shedding basically?
michaelcampbell大约 2 个月前
Anyone remember the movie Gattaca?
Simon_O_Rourke大约 2 个月前
If you know my mother in law, you don&#x27;t need a DNA tester to know she&#x27;s been in the restroom.
6d6b73大约 2 个月前
I wouldn&#x27;t be surprised that some some agencies *cough*Mosad*cough* are gathering DNA of leaders of all countries, and analyzing them, and potentially building bioweapons to target them. It looks like all you need to do is to get the HEPA filter from the room where the target was .
评论 #43401298 未加载