So much shadiness. Here's a few other ways:<p>- Tesla's statistics on AP/FSD-related crash incidents specifically does not include fatality incidents.<p>- Tesla's statistics on AP/FSD-related crash incidents specifically does not include any incidents without SRS airbag deployment (this may not seem egregious, but realize that current airbag algorithms are far more sophisticated than 'collision at x speed, deploy', and take into account angle of attack, whether the vehicle was decelerating or accelerating at the moment of impact, etc. It could decide that the best method of protecting a passenger in a 25mph collision is to fire the seatbelt tensioners, not the airbags. According to Tesla, this would "not be a reported incident". It also includes accidents where the vehicle is so severely damaged airbag systems -fail- to deploy. Also not an incident.)<p>- A previous fatality collision had Tesla holding a press conference when too much heat was coming toward their AP/FSD systems, to mislead the public. A Tesla spokesperson implied that the vehicle was actively warning the driver about inattentiveness and that that lead to the collision. When the NHTSA concluded their investigation they found that: the vehicle -had- warned the driver about inattentiveness, -one time-, and crucially, that that single incident happened -eighteen minutes- prior to the collision.