TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Repealing the CHIPS Act risks US national security

43 点作者 jhunter1016大约 2 个月前

10 条评论

jcfrei大约 2 个月前
Just cancel it, make a new Act with a different name and equal purpose, claim victory. Seems to be the most likely procedure with the current administration.
评论 #43398506 未加载
评论 #43398527 未加载
roter大约 2 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;m3TcW&#x2F;share" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;m3TcW&#x2F;share</a>
zoobab大约 2 个月前
Public money, public factories?<p>There is nothing public, just free money for the private sector.
评论 #43398730 未加载
9283409232大约 2 个月前
Trump supporters tell me Trump isn&#x27;t aiding China but then everything Trump does has a weird way of aiding China. Why would we repeal the CHIPS act and remove our ability to secure a domestic supply of chips?
评论 #43399279 未加载
Trasmatta大约 2 个月前
The US President is motivated entirely by spite and personal benefits vendettas. The only reason to repair the CHIPS act is because it was one of Biden&#x27;s bigger accomplishments, and Trump can&#x27;t stand that. That&#x27;s literally all it is.
评论 #43398815 未加载
esbranson大约 2 个月前
Trump&#x27;s SOTU for reference:<p>&gt; Your CHIPS Act is a horrible, horrible thing. We give hundreds of billions of dollars and it doesn’t mean a thing. They take our money and they don’t spend it. All that meant to them. We’re giving them no money. All that was important to them was they didn’t want to pay the tariffs. So they came and they’re building. And many other companies are coming. We don’t have to give them money, we just want to protect our businesses and our people, and they will come because they won’t have to pay tariffs if they build in America. So it’s very amazing. You should get rid of the CHIPS Act and whatever’s left over, Mr. Speaker, you should use it to reduce debt or any other reason you want to.
2OEH8eoCRo0大约 2 个月前
Repealing it requires congress.
评论 #43398779 未加载
jaza大约 2 个月前
Much of the money has already been spent, the new fabs are already operational slash well into construction, so repealing it now shouldn&#x27;t do that much damage. But it&#x27;ll still do some damage, and it&#x27;s still a stupid move, but hey, them&#x27;s the times we live in.
BiteCode_dev大约 2 个月前
Paywalled, so how did it go to the frontpage if most people can&#x27;t read it?
评论 #43398430 未加载
评论 #43398629 未加载
评论 #43398494 未加载
评论 #43398449 未加载
rayiner大约 2 个月前
Was national security impaired four years ago before the CHIPS Act?<p>That said I like the CHIPS Act in principle. We should have real industrial policy.
评论 #43398852 未加载
评论 #43398959 未加载
评论 #43398845 未加载