TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

New USPTO Memo Makes Fighting Patent Trolls Even Harder

316 点作者 healsdata大约 2 个月前

10 条评论

niwtsol大约 2 个月前
We dealt with some patent trolls back in the 2010-2020 era, for those who have not experienced it, it is absurd. In our case, the patent &quot;troll&quot; was an LLC w&#x2F; ~5 members - 2 lawyers, 1 person who owned the original patent, and some spouses. The only &quot;asset&quot; of the LLC was the patent. I think it was around scrollbars or some CSS overflow thing - they sent us a demand&#x2F;cease-desist letter saying they will sue for $1M and asked for a call. Classic Lawyer call &quot;well, we can make this all go away for $25k.&quot; We ended up fighting it a bit because of &quot;principles&quot; by our founder. - in discovery there was something like 1,000 of these exact demand letters they had sent.<p>The kicker? If you fight back, it costs a ton in legal fees, and even if you win, you can’t recover those fees — because the LLC’s only asset is the patent itself.<p>Just insane to me we would take a step back like this.
评论 #43441540 未加载
评论 #43440481 未加载
评论 #43440825 未加载
评论 #43445503 未加载
评论 #43440565 未加载
评论 #43443873 未加载
评论 #43440809 未加载
评论 #43440814 未加载
whatshisface大约 2 个月前
The policymaking with regards to industry is functioning more like a clearinghouse, where every interest group gets to have their targeted policy, than a coalition, where the event that one interest group&#x27;s target policy would hamstring another member would result in dealmaking and some sort of compromise. Certain industries like the steel industry receive steeply protectionist trade restraints, but they&#x27;re also being de-prioritized in favor of non-producing vexatious litigators who stop them from innovating. In essence this is similar to how some industries are seeing major policy-driven price increases on their outputs <i>and</i> inputs. Multiply that by every lobby and that&#x27;s all I can interpret out of the big picture.
ujkhsjkdhf234大约 2 个月前
&gt; Congress Created IPR to Protect the Public—Not Just Patent Owners<p>For this administration, this is a problem to be solved. Big business are the masters now and we need to make it easier for them to step on small business by any means.
评论 #43440180 未加载
reverendsteveii大约 2 个月前
Why do we keep moving toward a system where being ahead is the most viable way to get ahead?
评论 #43440404 未加载
评论 #43443933 未加载
评论 #43441230 未加载
评论 #43440582 未加载
评论 #43440579 未加载
评论 #43440696 未加载
评论 #43440852 未加载
评论 #43440795 未加载
silexia大约 2 个月前
We must get rid of the patent system. It is solely a way to grant monopolies to those who do not deserve them and slow down all human progress. Henry Ford said the gas engine was delayed twenty years by a frivolous patent.
cryptonector大约 2 个月前
Has the new administration replaced the leadership at the USPTO yet?
评论 #43442745 未加载
daedrdev大约 2 个月前
IPR is a tool that weakens all patents. Saying it helps trolls at the expense of everyone else (which this article says) is a bad faith argument. Weakening IPR helps all patent holders fight for their rights, including trolls. Considering how the tech industry has bullied its way past numerous rightful patents, this seems like it could be reasonable or might not be.<p>If you think we should have no patents be my guest, but this helps non troll patent holders and not just trolls.
评论 #43441556 未加载
评论 #43442123 未加载
buckle8017大约 2 个月前
Maybe it&#x27;s time for a patent pool for non-trolls covering patent to behavior.
评论 #43440109 未加载
评论 #43441288 未加载
评论 #43440714 未加载
评论 #43439978 未加载
TaurenHunter大约 2 个月前
USPTO is the U.S. Patent Troll Office?
amelius大约 2 个月前
We should have notarized LLM models for this. Timestamp your LLMs, put them in a notarized database. Then, if you en up in a patent lawsuit, just fire up the relevant LLM, and ask it in simple terms to reproduce troll&#x27;s claims.
评论 #43440496 未加载
评论 #43440164 未加载
评论 #43441614 未加载