TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

California Attorney General issues consumer alert for 23andMe customers

468 点作者 thoughtpeddler大约 2 个月前

27 条评论

pmags大约 2 个月前
I work in population genomics (non-human organisms), and myself participated in an early near-whole genome genotyping study back when microarrays were still the predominant technology (academic NOT commercial).<p>But for nearly 20 years I&#x27;ve been telling my extended family NOT to participate in any large scale genotyping with 23 and Me or similar commercial companies where they retain rights to your data, anticipating that something like the current scenario would likely play out.<p>Somehow, 23 and Me genotyping became the &quot;gift du jour&quot; for Xmas some years back -- I never personally understood that or why someone would want to turn over so much data to a commercial entity.<p>This is not to say that large scale sequence information is not appropriate for *some people*. But if that&#x27;s something you need, make every effort to make sure you own your own data.
评论 #43447775 未加载
评论 #43447847 未加载
评论 #43448015 未加载
评论 #43447881 未加载
评论 #43450844 未加载
评论 #43448412 未加载
评论 #43457431 未加载
评论 #43453135 未加载
评论 #43447926 未加载
评论 #43448038 未加载
评论 #43449502 未加载
评论 #43449785 未加载
Animats大约 2 个月前
The problem, not stated, is that a bankruptcy can wipe out the obligations of a company to its customers. This includes privacy obligations.[1] Especially if the assets are sold to a company outside California or outside the US.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;harvardlawreview.org&#x2F;print&#x2F;vol-138&#x2F;data-privacy-in-bankruptcy-the-consumer-privacy-ombudsman&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;harvardlawreview.org&#x2F;print&#x2F;vol-138&#x2F;data-privacy-in-b...</a>
评论 #43448276 未加载
评论 #43458100 未加载
huitzitziltzin大约 2 个月前
The fact that 23andme is at risk as a going concern tells you what you need to know about the potential of monetizing large amounts of generic data. It turns out you can’t get much value from it. If you could, they would have.<p>And no I <i>don’t</i> think all of that DNA data would be valuable to the likes of a large health insurer like Humana or Aetna either.<p>The medical records you are imagining an insurer can link to genetic data are worth even less than these DNA sequences turned out to be worth.<p>Sincerely,<p>A former health economist who has worked both with tens of millions of inpatient discharge records, and (separately) a detailed survey which is complemented by genetic data.
评论 #43449629 未加载
评论 #43450242 未加载
steelframe大约 2 个月前
Whenever I start feeling smug about how cagey I&#x27;ve been about data brokers in the past, I remind myself that enough of my relatives have handed over their DNA to operations like 23andMe so as to render my efforts futile.
评论 #43448008 未加载
评论 #43448501 未加载
评论 #43448150 未加载
arjie大约 2 个月前
The practice of how this does damage isn&#x27;t clear to me. But I&#x27;m going to test this in the very skin-in-the-game sense. My genome (sequenced by Nebula Genomics) is available to anyone who would like it. I have raw FASTQ files which you will have to pay a nominal fee to access.<p>Once upon a time, a friend and I decided we should launch a site where people can submit their genomes and health information so that broad population scale studies can be done. I did submit my stuff to All Of Us and so on, but I think the fact that you need to be special-cased to access the data is probably a loss.<p>So I think it&#x27;s time to revisit this whole thing. Perhaps I should make VCFs available instead. They&#x27;re much smaller and may be more accessible for people. In any case, if you want my FASTQs, just email me.
评论 #43447963 未加载
评论 #43447891 未加载
评论 #43447806 未加载
评论 #43450771 未加载
评论 #43450988 未加载
评论 #43448007 未加载
评论 #43450176 未加载
carimura大约 2 个月前
Sure you can delete your data, but guess what, they&#x27;ll retain it anyways under &quot;regulatory obligations&quot;. I&#x27;ve gone back and forth with their privacy team and this is the last response:<p><pre><code> &quot;This is a follow-up from the 23andMe Team. To clarify, we and our laboratory vendors are bound by various legal and regulatory obligations that may necessitate retention of certain information. We want to assure you that our data retention program adheres to applicable legal requirements which can vary depending on what country or state a customer lives in, the state a contracted laboratory is located in, and any applicable federal or state licensing obligations related to the ancestry and health products we sell. We can confirm that samples and genetic testing results are deleted in accordance with applicable law and any legal retention obligation serves as a proper exception related to a data deletion request under data privacy laws.&quot;</code></pre>
评论 #43454618 未加载
评论 #43449251 未加载
ronnier大约 2 个月前
&gt; The California-based company has publicly reported that it is in financial distress and stated in securities filings that there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern<p>This is one reason I use signal over other texting apps -- I don&#x27;t want my private messages sitting in a database waiting to be sold during a fire sale when the company goes under. Also why I try to locally host my apps such as security cameras, password manager, home automation, storage, wiki, among others
评论 #43448014 未加载
Guvante大约 2 个月前
If 23andme has an agreement with its consumers on how it will handle the data it should not matter whether they are bought that agreement should be maintained in perpetuity unless those consumers actively choose to change their agreement.<p>After all we wouldn&#x27;t talk about Dropbox being sold resulting in ransacking of your personal data why is that in the conversation with 23andme?<p>(I am not being critical of the AG here but instead pointing out how lax consumer protections have gotten that we even need to have this be a talking point)
评论 #43447830 未加载
评论 #43447654 未加载
jrm4大约 2 个月前
A simple rule.<p>When a company promises to never do a thing (e.g. be careless or sell off important data like this,) but there is no legal consequence or assurance, that company -- or some different company related to it -- is definitely, absolutely, going to do that thing.
IncreasePosts大约 2 个月前
23andme stock is down 99.12% from 5 years ago. Sheesh. What happened? Is it just not a viable business model or was it extremely mismanaged?
评论 #43448054 未加载
评论 #43447893 未加载
评论 #43448128 未加载
评论 #43447810 未加载
评论 #43447938 未加载
No1大约 2 个月前
I have been wanting to get my genome sequenced for years, and had been thinking 23andme might be one of the better options because of the possibility of invoking the CCPA to get my data deleted after sequencing. Never did it because I wonder if they sell your info to some third party the second it comes off the sequencer, and also because I&#x27;m skeptical that they would fully comply with a deletion request.<p>For people who would like to get their DNA sequenced but are actually concerned about privacy, are there any better options?
评论 #43451003 未加载
评论 #43456656 未加载
评论 #43450999 未加载
teeray大约 2 个月前
This sucks the most for everyone that never consented to genetic data collection, but they have it all anyway. If you were the only holdout in your family to not use 23andme, it doesn’t really matter since they know a lot about you anyway. Genetic information is fundamentally shared among a group, so you shouldn’t really be able to consent to disclose it in a way that allows a company to do whatever it wants with it. They haven’t obtained all of the consent.
robwwilliams大约 2 个月前
I do not understand the purpose of this alert. There are no explicit warnings, just a premonition. The alert merely says what all users should know that their genetic and survey data can be deleted if they request it to be deleted.<p>That obligation to delete user data is persistent and will apply to any buyer of 23andMe. Or am I wrong?<p>What is the AG of California intimating that the data is now at risk of being released into the wild or worse? That is how some will respond to this alert.<p>What many customers may not know is that they can also download these valuable genotype data and store locally if they wish. Using these data is not easy, but it is possible with a but of research and help.<p>Those who have used 23andMe should and can expect the security of their data to be maintained by the company, and that obligation would apply to any purchaser.
timewizard大约 2 个月前
&quot;Why would you spit into a tube then mail it to the internet?&quot;<p>-- Bill Burr
评论 #43447596 未加载
评论 #43447839 未加载
评论 #43447589 未加载
scoofy大约 2 个月前
If only we had any actual privacy laws in the United States.<p>I hate that I&#x27;m having my samples destroyed and removed from research. It feels wrong. But the idea that some company can quietly change the privacy terms on me is unacceptable. I would happily share my genetic data with researchers if I knew that the privacy agreement we had was irrevocable.
评论 #43451086 未加载
josefritzishere大约 2 个月前
I would advise urgency. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;customercare.23andme.com&#x2F;hc&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;articles&#x2F;212170688-Requesting-23andMe-Account-Closure" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;customercare.23andme.com&#x2F;hc&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;articles&#x2F;212170688...</a>
vishakh82大约 2 个月前
We&#x27;re launching a fully encrypted option for personal genomics called Monadic DNA.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;monadicdna.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;monadicdna.com&#x2F;</a><p>We use fully homomorphic encryption to ensure only you can see your data and your results.<p>The app will be live in a few weeks.
评论 #43451399 未加载
quantified大约 2 个月前
After you go through the steps to request deletion and physical destruction of the sample, you still need to trust them, a dying concern with the desire to monetize anything remaining, to actually carry it out.
评论 #43451087 未加载
ashoeafoot大约 2 个月前
Thank you to everyone who sold out their families genetics, you are uninsureable for all found so far genetic diseases , sign here, here and here.
fnord77大约 2 个月前
Bonta himself is about to be indicted by the feds in relation to the Duong family&#x2F;Sheng Thao corruption probe.
svanschalkwyk大约 2 个月前
Trying to delete and no date matches my birthday. How convenient.
sudoshred大约 2 个月前
Reminiscent of the movie Gattaca.
sMarsIntruder大约 2 个月前
Early user. IIRC it was kind of early ‘10.<p>Never gave consent for studies and asked for GDPR complete data removal I guess 5&#x2F;6 yrs ago.<p>Meanwhile I learned about privacy and promised myself to never get into this “things” again.
levocardia大约 2 个月前
So, what rich billionaire wants to buy the company, anonymize the data, then release it open-source? Would be a genuine boon to biohackers everywhere, privacy be damned.
评论 #43447709 未加载
评论 #43447730 未加载
评论 #43447811 未加载
评论 #43447823 未加载
slevis大约 2 个月前
It would be imo worse if the information just gets lost once 23andMe shuts down. Make genome and health information open access.
ripped_britches大约 2 个月前
Why is it his prerogative to suggest this? Doesn’t he have better things to do?
评论 #43448092 未加载
hayst4ck大约 2 个月前
It&#x27;s worth pointing out that this is a pro-corporate attack by the US&#x2F;california government against citizens who have their data in 23andme. This is one more item of clear evidence that it is not the citizens government, but corporations government. This is also why democrats lose. They can&#x27;t even wrangle corporate power in their own stronghold states.<p>Politicians have the responsibility of creating legislation to protect citizens, but by abandoning that responsibility and creating an &quot;opt-out&quot; system, those without knowledge or who aren&#x27;t paying active attention lose, and companies win. The company loses almost nothing if a handful of people opt out, and only a handful of people at most will opt out, so corporations win, the politicians continue to have the support of corporations so they win, and citizens who have things being done with their data, that they absolutely would not consent to, lose.<p>*edit: If you did 23andMe for health information or ancestry purposes, would you consent to that data being sold to an insurance company who might raise your rates, or in a crazy world, to a background check company that would inform a potential employer of any medical conditions that might be relevant to your stability as a worker?<p>Of course not. You would absolutely not consent to that.<p>This policy of warning people to delete their data instead of stopping action that no informed citizen would consent to not only doesn&#x27;t scale, but it is an abandonment of responsibility in order to retain corporate support (such as donations to run a campaign).
评论 #43447614 未加载
评论 #43448034 未加载
评论 #43447867 未加载
评论 #43447598 未加载