TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US Marines to get high-speed, radar-evading electric seagliders for rescue ops

135 点作者 jdmark大约 2 个月前

16 条评论

icegreentea2大约 2 个月前
Ha, I love the &quot;rescue ops&quot;.<p>This will not primarily be for rescue ops. This will be for supporting Marine standin operations on and within the first island chain. The marines have been trying to figure out how they can handle sustainment and logistics in that environment.<p>You can read some wonkish article about this (back in 2022) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;warontherocks.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;09&#x2F;sustainment-of-the-stand-in-force&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;warontherocks.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;09&#x2F;sustainment-of-the-stand-i...</a> . You&#x27;ll note that the article does suggest revisiting seaplanes as a distribution option.<p>With a few hundred miles range, these craft would be suitable as one way island to island hoppers, or 2 way over the horizon ship to shore transports. For a sense of scale, its ~140 miles from Luzon to Scarborough Shoal (one of the contested islands in the South China Sea).<p>The &quot;Viceroy&quot; craft that Regent has mocked up on their website claims 180 mile range, 3500lb of cargo &#x2F; 2 crew + 12 passengers.<p>EDIT: And to be clear, the article title says &quot;to get&quot;, but the article makes clear, this is basically a testing and development contract. There&#x27;s no certainty that the Marines will get this capability in any meaningful way. Probably better to replace with &quot;to test&quot;. This is particularly important because the commercial version of this craft is also still in development and testing.
评论 #43547196 未加载
评论 #43550081 未加载
评论 #43550427 未加载
评论 #43550101 未加载
评论 #43550517 未加载
评论 #43550612 未加载
评论 #43547230 未加载
评论 #43548412 未加载
评论 #43552735 未加载
评论 #43547509 未加载
JR1427大约 2 个月前
This is like the old Soviet Ekranoplans [1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lun-class_ekranoplan" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lun-class_ekranoplan</a>
评论 #43549602 未加载
acc_297大约 2 个月前
From the wiki I take it they have yet to build and fly a full-sized prototype<p>&quot;A 1&#x2F;4 scale model was successfully demonstrated in 2022 in Narragansett Bay&quot;[1]<p>Also I assume radar-proof is just because it&#x27;s a ground effect vehicle that will never fly high enough to show up on radar it certainly doesn&#x27;t look all angular like a stealth bomber. In which case my bicycle is also radar-proof?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;REGENT_Viceroy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;REGENT_Viceroy</a>
评论 #43546781 未加载
评论 #43547396 未加载
评论 #43547278 未加载
Rygian大约 2 个月前
I wonder why the title clarifies &quot;for rescue ops&quot;.<p>Is there anything inherent to this technology that prevents it from being used for anything else? The article body insists on &quot;demonstrations relevant to specific defense operations&quot; which sounds quite broad and not limited to rescue ops in any way.
评论 #43546352 未加载
评论 #43550073 未加载
评论 #43546830 未加载
评论 #43546381 未加载
nsiemsen大约 2 个月前
It&#x27;s a YC W21 company!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ycombinator.com&#x2F;companies&#x2F;regent">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ycombinator.com&#x2F;companies&#x2F;regent</a>
评论 #43552050 未加载
fidotron大约 2 个月前
Ground effect vehicles could be the thing that&#x27;s needed to make drone based delivery a reasonable thing to do, especially around lakes. It&#x27;s one of life&#x27;s perennial disappointments that such things only get done in military terms and under the ludicrous notion they are rescue vessels.
评论 #43547220 未加载
评论 #43549349 未加载
CapricornNoble大约 2 个月前
So they are just at Phase 2 of developing prototypes with the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory? Ok, that explains why I&#x27;ve not heard&#x2F;seen any deployment plans for these things within the next 5 years out here....which probably means if we <i>do</i> get them, we&#x27;ll get them too late to influence the war with China over Taiwan.<p>Other comments are correct that the Corps isn&#x27;t even close to solving the contested sustainment&#x2F;logistics problems here in the First Island Chain, or in the South China Sea.<p>These seagliders are a nifty solution to the signature management issues, but their payload is tiny. We need the ability to move pallets of munitions or other cargo.
foxyv大约 2 个月前
Low altitude is no longer a viable strategy for evading radar. Especially with the advent of datalink enabled satellite and other forms of downward looking radar. The propellers show up on pulse doppler like a flashing emergency light. Especially over the ocean with so little ground clutter.
bluesounddirect大约 2 个月前
is this a ground effect machine?
评论 #43546125 未加载
评论 #43546105 未加载
评论 #43545990 未加载
评论 #43527488 未加载
ein0p大约 2 个月前
Are they drone evading though? Because if not, then this is a waste of time and taxpayer money. Literally any idiot can 3D print a drone capable of defeating tens of millions of dollars in military hardware from 15-20 miles away. We&#x27;re not in Kansas anymore.
评论 #43551849 未加载
natmaka大约 2 个月前
Ében-Émael on Sea!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Battle_of_Fort_%C3%89ben-%C3%89mael" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Battle_of_Fort_%C3%89ben-%C3%8...</a>
650REDHAIR大约 2 个月前
Seeing YC-backed companies turn into DoD contractors makes me a little sick to my stomach.
lttlrck大约 2 个月前
$4.75mln seem like a great deal for a working prototype?<p>I&#x27;d love one of these in MS Flight Simulator or DCS.
zombiwoof大约 2 个月前
Hello Greenland
MaxPock大约 2 个月前
Congratulations for having capabilities Russia has had for three decades.
评论 #43547564 未加载
nimbius大约 2 个月前
&gt;high speed<p>these are prop aircraft.<p>&gt;radar evading<p>except for that insane heat signature coming from the half dozen DC motors and the RF emissions from them.<p>&gt;electric<p>unless teslas making it...probably not...<p>this sounds like a pork project...or PR fluff.
评论 #43547270 未加载