TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Is there something we lost when using AI to read a research paper?

2 点作者 HiPHInch大约 2 个月前
And how do one balance the reading and doing time ratio? like 2:8 or what

3 条评论

conartist6大约 2 个月前
I don&#x27;t know, and neither do you. I&#x27;m sure it wasn&#x27;t important though.<p>And of course there&#x27;s no chance that the summary had wrong information not just missing information.<p>But again it&#x27;s all ok because AI took the responsibility for reading and understanding away from you. If your negligence results in major harm, try telling everyone &quot;It was the AI&#x27;s fault. I have no responsibility. I was told that I would never have to read anything again anymore&quot;
JohnFen大约 2 个月前
Yes.<p>Even if the summary (regardless of how it is generated) is perfect, it&#x27;s leaving out a lot of information by definition. If it weren&#x27;t, then it wouldn&#x27;t be a summary at all -- it would be the original paper.
BrenBarn大约 2 个月前
Yes. Yes there is. It&#x27;s called reading the paper.