TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hackers strike Australia's largest pension funds in coordinated attacks

94 点作者 petethomas大约 2 个月前

6 条评论

trollbridge大约 2 个月前
Nearly every one of my clients have been invoice scammed. The amounts are typically five figures.<p>When we onboard a new customer, I send a packet with payment information including how to direct deposit. It has this information:<p>- Our routing&#x2F;account number. We sweep the funds out of this account nearly instantly once the deposits are made. The bank account’s purpose is to accept direct deposits and nothing else. The account number we transmit over the phone so at least it’s less likely to end up sitting in a (compromised) e-mail box.<p>- Our mailing address, which is a PO Box.<p>- Some information on invoice scams, including an offer to review any suspicious requests free of charge. A customer takes us up on this every few months… so far we have yet to see one legitimate one.<p>- A warning to never, ever accept changes for our payment information or mailing address unless told to do so in person by an officer of the company, with a list of the current officers.<p>- If in doubt, mail a check to the PO Box instead of direct deposit.<p>- A warning not to trust information sent via email, fax, phone calls (voice changers are a real thing), or from an employee&#x2F;officer other than the one they usually interact with, and such a change must be confirmed with a phone call to a different officer.<p>- A recommendation to also contact our local credit union (where we deposit payments from our customers) if they feel something is suspicious.<p>- We have an internal rule that any change to bank accounts requires a meeting of 3 officers, in person or over the Google Meet we normally use for video calls (no phone calls) with meeting minutes conducted for the change. The change must be unanimous and the change can’t be put in for 30 days unless an emergency. Emergencies must be coordinated with a responsible person at the bank, in person. (Sorry, but this means no fintech etc. type of banks.) We recommend our customers to do the same.<p>The biggest liability is that it would be hard for us to change bank accounts.<p>We get an attempt on an invoice scam or otherwise every few weeks. So far we haven’t lost a penny of company funds due to fraud.
评论 #43582429 未加载
评论 #43585550 未加载
seb1204大约 2 个月前
It irritates me to read that people have lost their pension. Surely this should read, the pension fund has lost their pension due to &quot;it safely breach&quot;? If a bank gets robbed they don&#x27;t steal my money but the banks right?
评论 #43580622 未加载
评论 #43583454 未加载
评论 #43584570 未加载
评论 #43583512 未加载
taberiand大约 2 个月前
I suppose it depends if it&#x27;s worse than reported currently, but it seems to me that with only 600 accounts losing an average of ~$800 each (and I&#x27;m going to go out on a limb and assume the users had poor password security), the fast detection and the immediate action to lock it down, there was a good and effective response by the companies attacked
评论 #43581046 未加载
评论 #43580545 未加载
dbetteridge大约 2 个月前
Tries to turn on mfa for my super-fund<p>Options (sms or email)<p>I wonder how this could have happened...
oldandboring大约 2 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;6uANR" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;6uANR</a>
damhsa大约 2 个月前
the amount lost is insignificant compared to that lost to wage theft, inflation, rent, interest -- forms of capital expansion<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikisource.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Manifesto_of_the_Communist_Party&#x2F;1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikisource.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Manifesto_of_the_Communist_Pa...</a>