TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Scientists Just Discovered Quantum Signals Inside Life Itself

4 点作者 8bitsrule大约 1 个月前

3 条评论

8bitsrule大约 1 个月前
Related paper URL: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pubs.acs.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1021&#x2F;acs.jpcb.3c07936" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pubs.acs.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1021&#x2F;acs.jpcb.3c07936</a>
rhet0rica大约 1 个月前
This is not the first quantum-mechanical biological phenomenon to be suggested: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.frontiersin.org&#x2F;journals&#x2F;quantum-science-and-technology&#x2F;articles&#x2F;10.3389&#x2F;frqst.2024.1466906&#x2F;full" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.frontiersin.org&#x2F;journals&#x2F;quantum-science-and-tec...</a><p>...however the author&#x27;s claims definitely do not follow in any meaningful way from the actual experiment. A few cytoskeletal proteins did something non-classical, so we have to re-evaluate the place of life in the universe? <i>What?</i><p>I believe this is another steaming pile from the cult of physicists who are convinced that their intelligence is so supreme and special that it must be empowered by a god of the gaps[1]—more specifically a god of the quantum gaps. No such luck, friend.<p>Remember the story about AI-designed chips[2] — what Stephen Wolfram identifies as &quot;lumps of irreducible computation&quot; in his recent article about the Game of Life[3]. As Wolfram notes, it&#x27;s <i>really</i> obvious when a new device in Life is discovered by brute-force search, because it has no separable components.<p>Biology is such a search algorithm; it moves in (almost) entirely random ways, and it sometimes stumbles upon truly incredible things. On a few occasions it actually stumbled onto <i>organization</i> as a viable technique for innovation, as encapsulation makes it easier to iterate on specific components without messing up the whole system. But on the whole, the mess remains a mess, and sometimes that means exploiting the rules—something virtually all learning algorithms are also prone to do if there are flaws in the rules of the game, e.g. [4].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;God_of_the_gaps" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;God_of_the_gaps</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43152407">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43152407</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;writings.stephenwolfram.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;03&#x2F;what-can-we-learn-about-engineering-and-innovation-from-half-a-century-of-the-game-of-life-cellular-automaton&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;writings.stephenwolfram.com&#x2F;2025&#x2F;03&#x2F;what-can-we-lear...</a><p>[4] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sociable.co&#x2F;technology&#x2F;ai-breaks-simulated-laws-of-physics-to-win-at-hide-and-seek&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sociable.co&#x2F;technology&#x2F;ai-breaks-simulated-laws-...</a>
评论 #43598509 未加载
nonrandomstring大约 1 个月前
Roger Penrose was right.