TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: To Patent, or Not To Patent

12 点作者 goodgoblin超过 16 年前
We filed for a provisional patent a year ago, and the year is just about up, so we need to decide whether to go for the full patent. Our lawyer is saying $5k for an opinion of counsel and then up to $10k more for the full patent. This is basically all of our remaining capital and then some. The patent, if we get it (82% were rejected last year), would theoretically protect us from competition if we could afford to litigate. More likely it would serve as a reason for us to get bought. If we don't go for the patent we won't have protection (not that it would come in for 3+ yrs or whatever), but we could still try and rule the market we are in. A patent might also help us get funding, if we try and seek it (more funding, right now we've got friends and family money). Needless to say, spending the rest of our money would put us in a tight spot.<p>Just wondering what HN's denizens thought of our situation or patents in general. thx.

12 条评论

mixmax超过 16 年前
I've started two companies that took out patents, and thus have seen this up close. My experience is:<p>- The market doesn't care about patents. Whether your product is good or bad a patent makes absolutely no difference to a customer.<p>- Competitors care very little about patents. They know the cost of patent litigation, and that you probably can't afford it. Even if you could they would probably be able to strike a deal.<p>- Investors, on the other hand, do care about patents. The thinking seems to go along the lones of <i>I have no idea which company to invest in, but the ones that have a patent must be the smart ones. So those are the ones I'll invest in</i>. - This is from Denmark, and may be different depending on your meatspace coordinates.<p>- Patents take time and focus. Patenting takes the focus off your product and selling it, and patents don't get you customers.<p>I would say that if you're gunning for investors get a patent, if you're not don't.<p>Hope it helps.<p>Edit: bonusinfo: If you have to go out and get a job at some point later in life a patent definitely helps. Employers are pretty impressed when you can say that you're so smart that you've taken out a patent...
评论 #436120 未加载
评论 #436315 未加载
评论 #436337 未加载
评论 #436105 未加载
davo11超过 16 年前
I'm in the same boat, my provisional runs out in April, and am wondering what to do. I lodged the provisional myself and save a few $K.<p>Here's my current thinking, over the course of the patent it will cost around $250K or more over 20 years. If I had $250K now would I spend it on my patent? Right now, I'd much rather have the $250K so from the good investment point of view - the answer is no.<p>What about the possibility of someone else patenting it? Well since the provisional has been lodged I don't think that's possible once the product is in the public domain, so from that angle I'm safe.<p>Can someone reverse engineer the patented bit? If they can what investment would they have to make to build a competing product, i.e. are there any other bits that aren't in the patent but are hard / risky. If a competitor has to make a large investment to catch up to you, then they may be better off just buying your company.<p>Will this be the only invention you ever make? If you're young and you've got something patentable already then most likely it wont be your last. It's not my first and I know it's not my last, once an inventor - always an inventor.<p>Someone mentioned it's good to have a patent on the resume, from my experience it can scare the hell out of some employers, so that's a bit of a 2 edged sword.<p>Perhaps the bit that get's stuck the most in my craw is that I'd be paying thousands of dollars to some patent guys who sit in a nice office and wear expensive suits and silk ties while I'm busting a gut making a startup, it's petty I know but it really gives me pause. I figure if they have all that money then there is a lot of cream on top of the patent industry.<p>The other thing to consider is how much time it takes to write a patent application. I know for myself it was a few weeks to actually write the provisional (and this was time well spent as I defined what I'd actually invented and found out a few other things along the way). It also takes time to work with the patent guys, don't underestimate this. You have to have meetings, review there work, make changes and so on.<p>I figure if my products successful, then by the time it reaches the point where I had to worry about patent infringements and so on I will have made more than enough money for me and I'll be doing this to grow to the next step.It usually takes about 5 years for a patent to be approved, 5 years is a long time in software.<p>The conclusion I've come to is it's a big boys game, and if you want to play then you have to pony up the cash, either get the cash or get investors who have the cash otherwise do what you can to protect yourself and move on. Of course it depends totally on what you're patenting - if it's a major breakthrough then it may be worth getting investors. If it's incremental then execution probably matters way more than whether or not you have a patent.<p>hth.
评论 #436442 未加载
natch超过 16 年前
One patent is not likely to be worth much. If you can put together a small cluster of them, it's much more compelling for an investor/buyer. Depends on what kind of patent, though.<p>'course, this isn't the best time to bet on getting funding, patents or not. Probably better to focus on finding an actual revenue stream.<p>And have you really done a diligent search for both existing patents, and prior art? Don't rely on your lawyer to do this; he/she has a financial disincentive to do anything that would discourage you from attempting to file a patent (I used the word "attempting" for a reason: your lawyer probably has things set up so that even a mere attempt will result in fees, whether that attempt is successful or not).<p>Also know that some patent lawyers file patents just to get the money for filing them. Read carefully, this point is distinct from the one in the previous paragraph. The fact that a patent is filed and eventually granted, does not mean it is a valuable patent. Your lawyer's job is generally not to judge the technical or business merit of the patent, unless you have specifically set up your relationship with him/her to provide an incentive for that. So be aware that your patent might prove to be worthless. While even a worthless patent will grease the skids with some investors, at least go into this with your eyes wide open.
lsc超过 16 年前
I dono... do you think you can compete better by marshaling lawyers? or by implementing a product better and sooner? How much of an opportunity cost does that money represent? (I mean, do you need that funding to run?)<p>The big thing I see is that it takes money to be a patent troll. I guess if the patent is really strong, you might be able to get your lawyers to work for a cut of the proceeds (maybe ask your lawyer?) but that sounds unlikely to me, not that I know anything about patent trolling. if your resources are like mine, I'd not worry about the patent, and I'd focus on making something that is worth copying.<p>But yeah. I'd argue that patent trolling is a lot like starting fist fights- don't start if you can't win. If you loose, you get nothing. You just get a black eye and look like an asshole. On the other hand, if you build a product and then get crushed by copycat competition with better resources, eh, you still learned something, and you still look good. You created something that was worth copying. At the very least it helps you get your next job.<p>But then, Maybe you have access to cheap lawyer time like I have access to cheap SysAdmin time. that'd change the equation.
shmoo超过 16 年前
Some large companies only patent defensively, in order to prevent other companies from patenting their ideas and then suing them. Enforcing patents is difficult.
mikeyur超过 16 年前
I don't have any experience personally, but I would say just work on your killer product. If a competitor comes along and you're already established as the leader it won't matter.<p>Save your capital.<p>Just my $0.02
wavesplash超过 16 年前
An alternate option is to give up some ownership of the patent for reduced cost and labor. Have you guys talked with IMSciences? They cut you a deal for a portion of the patent ownership and depending on the deal you cut can write most of it for you. (I don't work for them, nor have I filed anything with them but I have heard good things about one of the partners).
rms超过 16 年前
Write it yourself -- the provisional, especially if it was lawyer authored, should be almost good to go.
评论 #436173 未加载
vaksel超过 16 年前
if you can't afford it, forget about it.
volida超过 16 年前
well assuming you have a provisional patent and asking here, shouldn't you say what the patent is about?
dctoedt超过 16 年前
One question to ask is whether your product or service is even patentable in the first instance. Ask your lawyer about the court decision in the Bilski case, <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130.pdf</a>, which put some pretty tough restrictions on the patentability of software.
rrhyne超过 16 年前
Software patents are evil.