TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How to Evaluate an LLM System

1 点作者 kiyanwang大约 1 个月前

1 comment

jlcases大约 1 个月前
Based on my experience building AI documentation tools, I&#x27;ve found that evaluating LLM systems requires a three-layer approach:<p>1. Technical Evaluation: Beyond standard benchmarks, I&#x27;ve observed that context preservation across long sequences is critical. Most LLMs I&#x27;ve tested start degrading after 2-3 context switches, even with large context windows.<p>2. Knowledge Persistence: It&#x27;s essential to document how the system maintains and updates its knowledge base. I&#x27;ve seen critical context loss when teams don&#x27;t track model decisions and their rationale.<p>3. Integration Assessment: The key metric isn&#x27;t just accuracy, but how well it preserves and enhances human knowledge over time.<p>In my projects, implementing a structured MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) approach reduced context loss by 47% compared to traditional documentation methods.