TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google to embrace MCP

268 点作者 thoughtpeddler大约 1 个月前

20 条评论

jeswin30 天前
Given their anti-trust struggles, if Google for some reason dominates AI, they&#x27;d not want people to bring up anti-competitive behavior as a reason for that. Adopting open standards, especially open standards conceived outside Google is good for everyone including Google. They&#x27;re well placed - from research to hardware to software and data.<p>They&#x27;ll also want the industry to rapidly move forward and connect data to AI. MCP has momemtum.
评论 #43690215 未加载
Animats30 天前
Looks similar to most other mid-level remote procedure call protocols, from XMLRPC to CORBA. The usual sync, async, poll, progress test problems apply. Things I&#x27;d expected to see and didn&#x27;t:<p>- Client to server: &quot;tell me what you can do&quot;. This has always been hard, but in the LLM era, it could potentially work, because a textural response would work.<p>- Similarly, being able to ask &quot;How do I...&quot; might be feasible now. It should be possible to talk to a new server and automatically figure out how to use it.<p>- &quot;How much is this going to cost me?&quot; Plus some way to set a cost limit on a query.
评论 #43688712 未加载
评论 #43689857 未加载
评论 #43691034 未加载
jappgar29 天前
I&#x27;m kind glad that the industry is distracted by vibe-coding, &quot;tools&quot; and MCP.<p>It&#x27;s so clearly a dead-end. It gives freethinking developers and innovators time to focus on the next generation of software.
评论 #43692664 未加载
lawrenceyan30 天前
It doesn&#x27;t really matter what it is as there are many equally good implementations, but whoever sets up the framework first and cements usage is likely to guarantee dominance for the foreseeable future. Probably into AGI and post.<p>Model Context Protocol seems good enough to me.
评论 #43688475 未加载
flakiness30 天前
I hope Gemini gets a desktop app where MCP servers are more useful, but wonder if Google&#x27;s security posture allows it.
mellosouls30 天前
Related, discussion on A2A from the other day:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43631381">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43631381</a><p><i>&quot;The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A)&quot;, 279 comments</i>
评论 #43688623 未加载
omneity30 天前
I hope they also improve their JSONSchema support for structured output and tool calling. Currently it has many limitations compared to OpenAI’s, for example it doesn’t support “additionalProperties” which eliminates an entire class of use cases and makes it immediately incompatible with many MCP servers.<p>Marketing the API as OpenAI-compatible and then me getting 400s when I switch to Gemini leaves a sour taste in the mouth, and doesn’t make me confident about their MCP support.
pgt29 天前
Google owns 14% of Anthropic, author of MCP.
评论 #43691320 未加载
oezi30 天前
Does MCP solve authentication on user&#x27;s behalf which stifled OpenAI&#x27;s GPTs?<p>Tools often need access to data sources but I don&#x27;t want to hard code passwords.
评论 #43684942 未加载
评论 #43688723 未加载
评论 #43688541 未加载
rbanffy29 天前
Every time I see MCP I think of the Unisys mainframe OS.<p>It runs on x86 processors (under emulation), so it&#x27;d make some sense if Google offered it as an option in Google Cloud. Maybe they could offer OS2000, GCOS, and GECOS as well.
评论 #43691545 未加载
behnamoh30 天前
Well, Google is one of the major investors in Anthropic, so I&#x27;m not surprised.
noisy_boy29 天前
They have a chance to come-up with a user-friendly framework on top of MCP and make a big difference in acceleration of adoption. Cherry on the cake would be if they can build a UI on top of it to build&#x2F;monitor&#x2F;visualize. Hosted by them with a generous free-tier i.e. more private data to munch on for ads (only half joking).
edandersen30 天前
Are they going to release a Gemini desktop app with MCP support so normal people can use it?
whalesalad29 天前
it&#x27;s wild to me how rapidly this has exploded in popularity. there&#x27;s even a twitter account&#x2F;site dedicated to news updates - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;getMCPilled" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;getMCPilled</a> and mcpilled.com
phildougherty30 天前
interested to see if Agent-to-Agent protocol duplicates the MCP functionality eventually
评论 #43688739 未加载
skybrian30 天前
It’s terribly insecure as-is [1]. But so was HTTP. The spec isn’t final, so hopefully it will improve.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.sshh.io&#x2F;p&#x2F;everything-wrong-with-mcp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.sshh.io&#x2F;p&#x2F;everything-wrong-with-mcp</a>
评论 #43683732 未加载
stevenalowe30 天前
Master Control Program?
评论 #43688854 未加载
评论 #43689276 未加载
bluSCALE429 天前
Anyone else wish Google would just stay away from MCP? They manage to ruin everything.
评论 #43691347 未加载
lovich30 天前
Is there a good place to read on what the benefit of MCP is? I&#x27;m behind the curve on this agentic AI shit and am not quite sure where to look
评论 #43688735 未加载
评论 #43687342 未加载
tuyguntn30 天前
Didn&#x27;t Google introduce A2A just few days ago? Why Google itself is not heavily invested in their protocol?<p>Smells like a new project in Killed By Google graveyard.
评论 #43687248 未加载
评论 #43686674 未加载