TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Fake images that fooled the world

150 点作者 sandebert大约 1 个月前

12 条评论

OisinMoran28 天前
Surprised the 2008 Iranian missile fake didn&#x27;t make it in! This was one the demo images we used to show off our forgery detection software in the early days of Inscribe before we focused in on documents as a company.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;2008&#x2F;07&#x2F;11&#x2F;92442928&#x2F;photo-of-irans-missile-launch-was-manipulated" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;2008&#x2F;07&#x2F;11&#x2F;92442928&#x2F;photo-of-irans-missi...</a>
vunderba大约 1 个月前
Thought it might be a fun exercise to see how little time it would take to create similar approximations of the original deepfakes using GenAI models.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mordenstar.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;historic-deepfakes-with-ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mordenstar.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;historic-deepfakes-with-ai</a>
评论 #43699856 未加载
评论 #43678072 未加载
quantadev28 天前
It was actually just yesterday when I decided youtube shorts are no longer a fun way to kill time. There&#x27;s a lot of amazing stuff to watch, but it&#x27;s no fun any more, because anything you see that seems amazing is likely to be AI Generated which, for me, ruins it. You&#x27;re not watching videos of reality, you&#x27;re basically looking at digital art at this point.<p>Photos, Videos, and Audio are longer &quot;proof&quot; of anything. Any 10 year old kid can generate basically anything he wants. I love AI, but it&#x27;s sad to be living in a world where now &#x27;Authenticity&#x27; itself is permanently dead.
评论 #43705573 未加载
评论 #43700858 未加载
degamad28 天前
What qualifies the Jennifer in Paradise photo being in there? That photo reportedly is real, even according to the description given.<p>It was used as a demonstration photo in a famous photo-editing program which was used to fool the world, but the image is ostensibly a real photo, not a fake image.
评论 #43702039 未加载
评论 #43703955 未加载
评论 #43702135 未加载
the_af大约 1 个月前
I agree photo manipulation has always happened, to various degrees of perfection, since the dawn of photography.<p>I suppose the real difference is that before it took a more artisanal, time-consuming process, and now -- increasingly -- it takes far less time to create something convincing enough. Same with video: you could fake a video, do editing, etc, but it took time, skill, a location where to shoot, etc. Now it&#x27;s becoming easier to do for everyone. And it&#x27;s not perfect yet, but are we sure it won&#x27;t get there? And it doesn&#x27;t <i>have</i> to be perfect anyway, it just has to fool most people in a given window of time.
djoldman大约 1 个月前
A great example that underscores the <i>ordinariness</i> of AI. It&#x27;s a tool and tools can be used for good&#x2F;bad&#x2F;neither and inbetween.<p>Fake pics have existed since pics existed pretty much.<p>Kids have been looking for ways to cheat on tests since tests began. If you&#x27;re a teacher, you&#x27;re gonna have to test in person.<p>Fake phone calls, fake other things... yea they&#x27;re of a different&#x2F;better quality as the technology has gotten better. Is it so fundamental a shift that nothing can be done? I&#x27;m not convinced.
评论 #43674071 未加载
评论 #43674666 未加载
评论 #43674610 未加载
评论 #43699693 未加载
评论 #43703489 未加载
评论 #43705370 未加载
评论 #43704044 未加载
ur-whale27 天前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;H02yP" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;H02yP</a>
drcongo大约 1 个月前
There&#x27;s some terrible examples in here, and yet no mention of Roger Fen­ton&#x27;s Valley of the Shadow of Death.
评论 #43702935 未加载
vfclists大约 1 个月前
What!!?? No mention of the Apollo 11 photos?
评论 #43700898 未加载
评论 #43703198 未加载
评论 #43674245 未加载
the_af大约 1 个月前
The article is interesting, but I think it conflates two things:<p>&quot;Things that never happened in the real world, and have been either created synthetically or with visual trickery&quot;<p>- Man jumping into the void.<p>- Stalin&#x27;s edited photos (Stalin didn&#x27;t walk without Yezov at his side).<p>- North Korea&#x27;s photoshopped&#x2F;cloned hovercraft.<p>- The Cottingley Fairies, Loch Ness monster, &quot;saucer&quot; UFOs: visual trickery or props employed to simulate the existence of beings or vehicles that don&#x27;t exist in the real world.<p>- Pope with jacket is of course completely faked with AI.<p>And<p>&quot;Things that happened, but are staged or misrepresent reality&#x2F;mislead the viewer&quot;.<p>Examples:<p>- The UK soldiers abusing a prisoner. The claim was probably false (in the sense in this particlar photo these weren&#x27;t British soldiers) but it&#x27;s true they were soldiers from <i>some</i> country abusing a prisoner. To my knowledge no-one claimed the photo was staged, just that it was misrepresenting the situation.<p>- Capa&#x27;s Falling Soldier photo. This actually happened, it&#x27;s just that it&#x27;s likely staged.<p>They are not the same thing, and require different levels of skill!<p>AI facilitates creating <i>anything</i>, especially completely synthetic and fake. You don&#x27;t even need to go to the location to take a photo and edit it.
评论 #43679251 未加载
评论 #43674232 未加载
Reasoning大约 1 个月前
&quot;By the 1940s, the image without the groom had become the standard version, and it created the enduring visual signs of the strongman leader – when Nigel Farage makes a speech atop a tank, or Vladimir Putin displays his bare chest, both are drawing on iconography developed by the Italian fascist.&quot;<p>Ah yes, equestrian portraits, something famously invented by the fascists. Someone should dig up Jacques-Louis so we can tell him he&#x27;s a fascist now.
评论 #43700026 未加载
excalibur大约 1 个月前
Surprised the article makes no mention of the 2023 AI-assisted enhancement of the Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot clip. It&#x27;s definitely a guy in a gorilla suit.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.indy100.com&#x2F;science-tech&#x2F;bigfoot-footage-ai-sighting-revealed-2662025448" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.indy100.com&#x2F;science-tech&#x2F;bigfoot-footage-ai-sigh...</a>
评论 #43674404 未加载
评论 #43700830 未加载
评论 #43674313 未加载
评论 #43674219 未加载