TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Isolated Execution Environment for eBPF

21 点作者 tuananh大约 1 个月前

2 条评论

skywhopper大约 1 个月前
Am I missing where this article actually proposes this “isolated execution environment”? It’s mentioned in the intro and summary (and title), but the rest of the post is mainly a list of why it’s hard to do early verification of eBPF code.<p>Okay, this is true!<p>So I’m left wanting to know why the author thinks less rigid “isolation” is a suitable answer to the problem. “JavaScript does something similar” is the only detail I could find. But JavaScript notably does not run in the kernel.<p>Ultimately this just seems like a post saying “it’s too hard to do everything we want within the current limitations of eBPF. But makes no effort to explain why getting rid of these strictures would be worth the huge security and reliability hole it would be creating, or how they would avoid those issues.
westurner大约 1 个月前
From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43553198">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43553198</a> .. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43564972">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43564972</a> :<p>&gt; <i>Can</i> [or should] <i>a microkernel run eBPF?</i> [or WASM?]<p>The performance benefits of running eBPF in the kernel are substantial and justifying, but how much should a kernel or a microkernel do?