TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Amazon Web Services dark patterns (2024)

28 点作者 latexr25 天前

7 条评论

gregw225 天前
AWS should provide features where you are prompted to set a hard budget limit when you first signup and services fail once that&#x27;s exceeded, so you don&#x27;t get surprised, but they don&#x27;t. That should be opt-out.<p>(recent thread on this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42133700">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42133700</a> )<p>AWS does provide free trial accounts with $25 credits in some of their training environments&#x2F;partners so there already are &#x2F;some&#x2F; ways to do this.<p>(AWS does provide a opt-in budgeting feature which can alert you if budgets are exceeded. Not the same!)<p>While on the subject, AWS should provide an account-level setting&#x2F;feature such that if there are multiple people&#x2F;users&#x2F;IAM logging into a single account, there is a flag so that any resources invoked in the console by a user get auto-tagged with that user&#x27;s ID&#x2F;IAM-identity&#x2F;etc. In a small business with technical users, this would be quite helpful.<p>I went to give my 10 year old access to my old AWS account to play around and figured I should add some billing guardrails and was saddened to find I could anymore setup Cloudwatch&#x2F;Budget billing alert guardrails to SMS my phone without paying $X a month for the SMS setup. Email is supported so I suppose I shouldn&#x27;t complain and I hate SMS spammers so I get it but still another scenario of an unfriendly experience.<p>-- Someone using AWS the last 11 years, responsible for millions of dollars in enterprise spend on it, and sad to see their customer-centric attitude only goes so deep. I feel it getting weaker over time but there have always been limits to it.
评论 #43731578 未加载
评论 #43731026 未加载
评论 #43732967 未加载
Mo325 天前
While I absolutely agree on the topic of hand, Aurora isn&#x27;t necessarily the best example.. for what it offers it&#x27;s &quot;relatively&quot; cheap.. and please don&#x27;t mention Hetzner now, we&#x27;re talking fully managed extremely reliable, redundant and multi-AZ databases
apitman25 天前
It feels like basically everything is dark patterns now. Universally hated by users, and yet it must make corps more many otherwise they probably wouldn&#x27;t do it. I wish there was a way to advertise &quot;we don&#x27;t do dark patterns&quot; in a way users could connect to all the things they hate about modern transactions.
aweiher24 天前
I once tried OpenSearch serverless, as it is advertised as &quot;you only pay for the resources consumed by the workload&quot;.<p>After one month of not using it I was surprised by a 300+$ bill as there is a minimum of 2 OCU billed. Yes it is explained on the billing page later in more technical terms but was still surprising for me as I have a different understanding of &quot;only pay what was consumed&quot;.
burnished25 天前
I have had this experience as a student. I&#x27;m going through their offerings now to beef up my resume and am a little anxious about getting hands on with their free trials due to the level of knowledge I may already need to have to avoid an expensive mistake.
评论 #43730939 未加载
jonplackett25 天前
I did this a few years ago but it took me 2 months to notice! I had to put that $200 on my ‘idiot tab’ for the year. But I feel better now knowing I was dark-patterned.
nunez25 天前
You can&#x27;t use a Privacy.com card either, or you couldn&#x27;t last year when I tried.