TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Inside ArXiv

167 点作者 fprog大约 1 个月前

8 条评论

mitchbob大约 2 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;2025.03.27-115038&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;inside-arxiv-most-transformative-code-science&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;2025.03.27-115038&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;s...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250419005938&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;inside-arxiv-most-transformative-code-science&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20250419005938&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired....</a>
yubblegum大约 1 个月前
&gt; (“xxx” didn’t have the explicit connotations it does today, Ginsparg emphasized).<p>In the 90s? That is so not true me think Paul is willfully being forgetful.
sundarurfriend大约 1 个月前
The article has a melancholic tone running through it, felt especially keenly when you consider it a microcosm of the much wider struggles of maintaining a public good: sustaining it while keeping its integrity.<p>When your service is small or not easily visible - while still doing significant good - it&#x27;s hard to find enough people willing to spend their time and resources helping you sustain it.<p>When your service becomes big enough to be noticeable - which is the arXiv is in by now - it also becomes attractive to the people looking to subvert it to be something else, to enshittify it, and so the limiting factor in getting help becomes the risk to its integrity.
评论 #43742412 未加载
randomNumber7大约 1 个月前
&gt; For scientists, imagining a world without arXiv is like the rest of us imagining one without public libraries<p>Are there scientists that don&#x27;t know libgen or scihub?
评论 #43750649 未加载
评论 #43752045 未加载
评论 #43750529 未加载
auggierose大约 1 个月前
I prefer Zenodo (hosted by CERN). More features (such as access restrictions), and no fuss about what kind of data I want to upload (any PDF is fine).
评论 #43749469 未加载
nickpsecurity大约 1 个月前
Re article<p>&quot;In 2021, the journal Nature declared arXiv one of the “10 computer codes that transformed science,” praising its role in fostering scientific collaboration. (The article is behind a paywall—unlock it for $199 a year.)&quot;<p>Burned!<p>Re ArXiv<p>I read in their licensing that some papers are licensed for non-commercial use. Does anyone know an easy way to tell which are licensed that way?<p>I normally see the main, ArXiv page for a specific paper. Is there something on the page for licensing that I overlooked?
westurner大约 2 个月前
ArXiv: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ArXiv" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ArXiv</a><p>ArXiv accepts .ps (PostScript), .tex (LaTeX source), and .pdf (PDF) ScholarlyArticle uploads.<p>ArXiv docs &gt; Formats for text of submission: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;info.arxiv.org&#x2F;help&#x2F;submit&#x2F;index.html#formats-for-text-of-submission" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;info.arxiv.org&#x2F;help&#x2F;submit&#x2F;index.html#formats-for-te...</a><p>The internet and the web are the most transformative platforms in all of science, though.
behnamoh大约 1 个月前
arXiv has one of my papers on hold for a long time because their team couldn&#x27;t believe I—someone without a CS degree—was able to create a programming language from scratch on my own.
评论 #43740398 未加载
评论 #43741740 未加载
评论 #43749783 未加载