TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Raspberry Pi Lidar Scanner

686 点作者 Venn1大约 1 个月前

18 条评论

godelski大约 1 个月前
This is really cool<p>One thing I&#x27;d suggest, for any hardware product, is that when doing your bill of materials to provide links and show estimated costs. Sure, these will change but having a rough idea of the costs is really helpful, especially when perusing on from things like HN. It can be a big difference for someone to decide if they want to try it on their own or not. It is the ballpark figures that matter, not the specifics.<p>You did all that research, write it down. If for no one but yourself! Providing links is highly helpful because names can be funky and helps people (including your future self) know if this is the same thing or not. It&#x27;s always noisy, but these things reduce noise. Importantly, they take no time while you&#x27;re doing the project (you literally bought the parts, so you have the link and the price). It saves yourself a lot of hassle, not just for others. Document because no one remembers anything after a few days or weeks. It takes 10 seconds to write it down and 30 minutes to do the thing all over again, so be lazy and document. I think this is one of the biggest lessons I learned when I started as an engineer. You save yourself so much time. You just got to fight that dumb part in your head that is trying to convince you that it doesn&#x27;t save time. (Same with documenting code[0])<p>Here. I did a quick &quot;15 minute&quot; look. May not be accurate<p><pre><code> Lidar: One of: LD06: $80 https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aliexpress.us&#x2F;item&#x2F;3256803352905216.html LD19: $70 https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;DTOF-D300-Distance-Obstacle-Education&#x2F;dp&#x2F;B0B1V8D36H STL27L: $160 https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dfrobot.com&#x2F;product-2726.html Camera and Lens: $60 https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Arducam-Raspberry-Camera-Distortion-Compatible&#x2F;dp&#x2F;B0B1MN721K Raspberry Pi 4: $50 NEMA17 42-23 stepper: $10 https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;SIMAX3D-Nema17-Stepper-Motor&#x2F;dp&#x2F;B0CQLFNSMJ </code></pre> That gives us $200-$280 before counting the power supply and buck converter.<p>[0] When I wrote the code only me and god understood what was going on. But as time marched on, now only god knows.
评论 #43740351 未加载
评论 #43741949 未加载
评论 #43747053 未加载
评论 #43738921 未加载
评论 #43741512 未加载
Animats大约 1 个月前
The actual scanners: [1]<p>Max range 12 meters. That&#x27;s when it seems to start to get expensive. The light source, filters, and sensors all have to get better.<p>Good enough for most small robots. Maybe good enough for the minor sensors on self-driving cars, the ones that cover the vehicle perimeter so kids and dogs are reliably sensed. The big long-range LIDAR up top is still hard.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ldrobot.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ldrobot.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #43741056 未加载
abraae大约 1 个月前
There&#x27;s a lot of stuff that was better in the &quot;good old days&quot;.<p>But to be alive when it&#x27;s possible for gifted individuals to create technology like this is just incredible.
amelius大约 1 个月前
Somewhat related. I&#x27;m looking for a cheap way to measure distances to approx 10 microns accuracy, over distances on the order of 300mm. Any ideas?
评论 #43744818 未加载
评论 #43740507 未加载
评论 #43741900 未加载
评论 #43740185 未加载
评论 #43742743 未加载
评论 #43739343 未加载
评论 #43739235 未加载
评论 #43740094 未加载
politelemon大约 1 个月前
The sketchfab examples are fantastic, to be able to move around in a 3D space, like it&#x27;s some kind of scifi simulation.<p>The mouse controls are confusing the heck out of me. It shows a &#x27;grab&#x27; icon but nothing about it grabs as the movement direction is the opposite, feels completely unnatural.
mannyv大约 1 个月前
You could probably harvest these from robot vacuums on ebay&#x2F;goodwill.
评论 #43739217 未加载
joeevans1000大约 1 个月前
This is amazing! Thank you!<p>It may be in the project as I just scanned through i (but will read through it properly soon), but do you have any of the data for accuracy? Say, over 10M (Or less, if this lidar doesn&#x27;t work at that distance).<p>I&#x27;m familiar with the FARO scanners which have a different type of mechanism. Their accuracy is good enough for building things.<p>I&#x27;ve discovered there&#x27;s several markets for scanners… among those are people who need accuracy and people who are creating content for media like games.<p>Thank you so much for sharing this project. It&#x27;s truly unbelievable.
heljara大约 1 个月前
I&#x27;ve been toying with photogrammetry a little bit lately, specifically for scanning indoor rooms and spaces. So far I&#x27;m finding metashape the most suitable for it, but some of the precision isn&#x27;t great (but I&#x27;m still improving my technique). I mostly want to convert the interior of one real building into a digital model for preservation and analysis. I&#x27;ve briefly considered LIDAR, but put it in the too hard&#x2F;expensive bucket. This project seems to challenge that assumption.<p>What does the software post-processing look like for this? Can I get a point cloud that I can then merge with other data (like DSLR photographs for texturing)?<p>I see in their second image[1] some of the wall is not scanned as it was blocked by a hanging lamp, and possibly the LIDAR could not see over the top of the couch either. Can I merge two (or more) point clouds to see around objects and corners? Will software be able to self-align common walls&#x2F;points to identify its in the same physical room, or will that require some jiggery-pokery? Is there a LIDAR equivalent of coded targets or ARTags[0]? Would this scale to multiple rooms?<p>Is this even worth considering, or will it be more hassle than its worth compared to well-done photogrammetry?<p>(Apologies for the peak-of-mount-stupid questions, I don&#x27;t know what I don&#x27;t know)<p>0: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ARTag" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ARTag</a> 1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;PiLiDAR&#x2F;PiLiDAR&#x2F;raw&#x2F;main&#x2F;images&#x2F;interior.jpeg">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;PiLiDAR&#x2F;PiLiDAR&#x2F;raw&#x2F;main&#x2F;images&#x2F;interior....</a>
评论 #43743211 未加载
badmonster大约 1 个月前
Hi! Thanks for sharing this amazing work. I’m curious about the scalability and performance of PiLiDAR when deployed on large-scale outdoor datasets. Have you benchmarked it on datasets like SemanticKITTI or nuScenes? If so, could you share any insights on runtime, memory usage, and how well it generalizes beyond the indoor scenes used in your paper?
评论 #43739643 未加载
donatj大约 1 个月前
Oh hey! This is exactly what I was looking for just a couple weeks ago! I&#x27;ve had parts to prototype something roughly equivalent to this sitting in my cart on Amazon for a couple weeks now, but I&#x27;ve been very uncertain on my choice of actual lidar scanner.<p>I&#x27;ll have to look into this as a starting point I get back from Easter vacation
itissid大约 1 个月前
For home improvement projects, This could be quite useful for generating point cloud map of places hard to get to. Like I have drywall installations I would love to get behind and check how things look, this would be great for that.
评论 #43742336 未加载
joeevans1000大约 1 个月前
I noticed that you can&#x27;t use it commercially without contributing. How much do you have to contribute for that and where would someone do it?
评论 #43766501 未加载
Aspos大约 1 个月前
GY-521 in particular and MPU6050 in general make quite poor IMUs. Why do you use them? And what for in this particular case? What do they do in this set up?
评论 #43741811 未加载
Havoc大约 1 个月前
How safe are these sorts of sensors for eyes?
评论 #43742536 未加载
mannyv大约 1 个月前
How do you make it so your LIDAR doesn&#x27;t interfere with someone else&#x27;s LIDAR?
评论 #43744101 未加载
评论 #43742525 未加载
dheera大约 1 个月前
It&#x27;s not obvious what the heck this is without reading into it. A full 4pi steradian scanner? a 360 degree 1 channel LIDAR? A fisheye camera plus some single channel LIDAR plus monocular depth estimation networks to cover everything not in the plane of the lidar?<p>It would be great to clarify <i>what</i> it is in the first sentence.
评论 #43741820 未加载
评论 #43739508 未加载
wkat4242大约 1 个月前
Wow. Lidars have become so good. This is amazing. I had no idea
Liftyee大约 1 个月前
It&#x27;s impressive that the cost of usable LIDAR tech is well within the reach of personal projects now. The sensors used on the first self-driving cars (from companies like SICK, etc.) likely perform much better but the price point of multiple k$ is not really viable for experimentation at home.<p>Not to make everything political, but I wonder how the US tariffs will affect electronics-adjacent hobbies. Anecdotally, the flashlight community on Reddit has been panicking a little about this.
评论 #43738742 未加载
评论 #43740369 未加载
评论 #43738759 未加载
评论 #43739364 未加载
评论 #43738751 未加载
评论 #43738712 未加载