TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

ChatGPT spends 'tens of millions of dollars' on 'please' and 'thank you'

15 点作者 arealaccount25 天前

5 条评论

jsnell25 天前
This number does not seem credible. Most likely Altman just made it up.<p>Back of the envelope:<p>OpenAI inference costs last year were 4B. Tens of millions would be at least 20M, i.e. 0.5%.<p>That 4B is not just the electricity cost. It needs to cover the amortized cost of the hardware, the cloud provider&#x27;s margin, etc.<p>Let&#x27;s say a H100 costs $30k, and has a lifetime of 5 years. I make that about $16 &#x2F; day in depreciation. The H100 run at 100% utilization will use 17kWH of electricity in a day. What does that cost? $2-$3 &#x2F; day? Let&#x27;s assume the cloud provider&#x27;s margin is 0. That still means power consumption is maybe 1&#x2F;5th of the total inference cost.<p>So the comparison is 800M vs 20M (2.5%).<p>Can 2.5% of their tokens be pleasantries? Seems impossible. A &quot;please&quot; is a single token, which will be totally swamped by the output, which will typically be 1000x that.
评论 #43747983 未加载
评论 #43747910 未加载
pupppet25 天前
If after the AI uprising I get remembered as one of the good ones, I’m OK with OpenAI paying that price.
评论 #43747839 未加载
评论 #43747537 未加载
gblargg25 天前
I grill my AIs like a they are a suspect in an interrogation room.
评论 #43748141 未加载
评论 #43747233 未加载
jowea25 天前
&gt; with 12% being polite in case of a robot uprising.<p>I wonder if they mean it or it&#x27;s just joke answer.
评论 #43746934 未加载
marklyon24 天前
Why not add some if statements and save a buck?