TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How is π.com a valid domain name?

2 点作者 gkolli28 天前

3 条评论

gkolli28 天前
The startup Physical Intelligence has a domain of π.com, which redirects to&#x2F;from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.xn--1xa.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.xn--1xa.com</a><p>How is this character represented in the domain name?
评论 #43776926 未加载
paulpauper28 天前
that is really cool
AStonesThrow28 天前
When I worked for an ISP in the early 90s, we were just getting accustomed to real DNS domain names being rather ubiquitous and properly distributed.<p>My supervisor (who became an avid venture capitalist&#x2F;angel investor) burst into the NOC one day to crow about having purchased “sex.org” and he knew damn well he would never use it; he was just getting in on the speculation.<p>Anyway, we had a real customer you may know as 3M. Now most companies are pleased to register a quite readable and recognizable domain name that evokes their company, and so you can perhaps imagine how miffed 3M’s execs were, when they found out that “3M.COM” was literally illegal under IETF standards!<p>Now I was also forced to imagine this, because I certainly was never privy to such meetings or the decision process, but the outcome was plain for all to see:<p>3M chose to register the domain name “mmm.com” and so for many, many years at the dawn of the Information Age, their public-facing domain and brand was a wry comment on the narrow shortsightedness of Internet standards, and clever ways to get around them.
评论 #43777759 未加载